Cargando…

Lean back and wait for the alarm? Testing an automated alarm system for nosocomial outbreaks to provide support for infection control professionals

INTRODUCTION: Outbreaks of communicable diseases in hospitals need to be quickly detected in order to enable immediate control. The increasing digitalization of hospital data processing offers potential solutions for automated outbreak detection systems (AODS). Our goal was to assess a newly develop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schröder, Christin, Peña Diaz, Luis Alberto, Rohde, Anna Maria, Piening, Brar, Aghdassi, Seven Johannes Sam, Pilarski, Georg, Thoma, Norbert, Gastmeier, Petra, Leistner, Rasmus, Behnke, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6980399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31978086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227955
_version_ 1783490947327197184
author Schröder, Christin
Peña Diaz, Luis Alberto
Rohde, Anna Maria
Piening, Brar
Aghdassi, Seven Johannes Sam
Pilarski, Georg
Thoma, Norbert
Gastmeier, Petra
Leistner, Rasmus
Behnke, Michael
author_facet Schröder, Christin
Peña Diaz, Luis Alberto
Rohde, Anna Maria
Piening, Brar
Aghdassi, Seven Johannes Sam
Pilarski, Georg
Thoma, Norbert
Gastmeier, Petra
Leistner, Rasmus
Behnke, Michael
author_sort Schröder, Christin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Outbreaks of communicable diseases in hospitals need to be quickly detected in order to enable immediate control. The increasing digitalization of hospital data processing offers potential solutions for automated outbreak detection systems (AODS). Our goal was to assess a newly developed AODS. METHODS: Our AODS was based on the diagnostic results of routine clinical microbiological examinations. The system prospectively counted detections per bacterial pathogen over time for the years 2016 and 2017. The baseline data covers data from 2013–2015. The comparative analysis was based on six different mathematical algorithms (normal/Poisson and score prediction intervals, the early aberration reporting system, negative binomial CUSUMs, and the Farrington algorithm). The clusters automatically detected were then compared with the results of our manual outbreak detection system. RESULTS: During the analysis period, 14 different hospital outbreaks were detected as a result of conventional manual outbreak detection. Based on the pathogens’ overall incidence, outbreaks were divided into two categories: outbreaks with rarely detected pathogens (sporadic) and outbreaks with often detected pathogens (endemic). For outbreaks with sporadic pathogens, the detection rate of our AODS ranged from 83% to 100%. Every algorithm detected 6 of 7 outbreaks with a sporadic pathogen. The AODS identified outbreaks with an endemic pathogen were at a detection rate of 33% to 100%. For endemic pathogens, the results varied based on the epidemiological characteristics of each outbreak and pathogen. CONCLUSION: AODS for hospitals based on routine microbiological data is feasible and can provide relevant benefits for infection control teams. It offers in-time automated notification of suspected pathogen clusters especially for sporadically occurring pathogens. However, outbreaks of endemically detected pathogens need further individual pathogen-specific and setting-specific adjustments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6980399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69803992020-02-04 Lean back and wait for the alarm? Testing an automated alarm system for nosocomial outbreaks to provide support for infection control professionals Schröder, Christin Peña Diaz, Luis Alberto Rohde, Anna Maria Piening, Brar Aghdassi, Seven Johannes Sam Pilarski, Georg Thoma, Norbert Gastmeier, Petra Leistner, Rasmus Behnke, Michael PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Outbreaks of communicable diseases in hospitals need to be quickly detected in order to enable immediate control. The increasing digitalization of hospital data processing offers potential solutions for automated outbreak detection systems (AODS). Our goal was to assess a newly developed AODS. METHODS: Our AODS was based on the diagnostic results of routine clinical microbiological examinations. The system prospectively counted detections per bacterial pathogen over time for the years 2016 and 2017. The baseline data covers data from 2013–2015. The comparative analysis was based on six different mathematical algorithms (normal/Poisson and score prediction intervals, the early aberration reporting system, negative binomial CUSUMs, and the Farrington algorithm). The clusters automatically detected were then compared with the results of our manual outbreak detection system. RESULTS: During the analysis period, 14 different hospital outbreaks were detected as a result of conventional manual outbreak detection. Based on the pathogens’ overall incidence, outbreaks were divided into two categories: outbreaks with rarely detected pathogens (sporadic) and outbreaks with often detected pathogens (endemic). For outbreaks with sporadic pathogens, the detection rate of our AODS ranged from 83% to 100%. Every algorithm detected 6 of 7 outbreaks with a sporadic pathogen. The AODS identified outbreaks with an endemic pathogen were at a detection rate of 33% to 100%. For endemic pathogens, the results varied based on the epidemiological characteristics of each outbreak and pathogen. CONCLUSION: AODS for hospitals based on routine microbiological data is feasible and can provide relevant benefits for infection control teams. It offers in-time automated notification of suspected pathogen clusters especially for sporadically occurring pathogens. However, outbreaks of endemically detected pathogens need further individual pathogen-specific and setting-specific adjustments. Public Library of Science 2020-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6980399/ /pubmed/31978086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227955 Text en © 2020 Schröder et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schröder, Christin
Peña Diaz, Luis Alberto
Rohde, Anna Maria
Piening, Brar
Aghdassi, Seven Johannes Sam
Pilarski, Georg
Thoma, Norbert
Gastmeier, Petra
Leistner, Rasmus
Behnke, Michael
Lean back and wait for the alarm? Testing an automated alarm system for nosocomial outbreaks to provide support for infection control professionals
title Lean back and wait for the alarm? Testing an automated alarm system for nosocomial outbreaks to provide support for infection control professionals
title_full Lean back and wait for the alarm? Testing an automated alarm system for nosocomial outbreaks to provide support for infection control professionals
title_fullStr Lean back and wait for the alarm? Testing an automated alarm system for nosocomial outbreaks to provide support for infection control professionals
title_full_unstemmed Lean back and wait for the alarm? Testing an automated alarm system for nosocomial outbreaks to provide support for infection control professionals
title_short Lean back and wait for the alarm? Testing an automated alarm system for nosocomial outbreaks to provide support for infection control professionals
title_sort lean back and wait for the alarm? testing an automated alarm system for nosocomial outbreaks to provide support for infection control professionals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6980399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31978086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227955
work_keys_str_mv AT schroderchristin leanbackandwaitforthealarmtestinganautomatedalarmsystemfornosocomialoutbreakstoprovidesupportforinfectioncontrolprofessionals
AT penadiazluisalberto leanbackandwaitforthealarmtestinganautomatedalarmsystemfornosocomialoutbreakstoprovidesupportforinfectioncontrolprofessionals
AT rohdeannamaria leanbackandwaitforthealarmtestinganautomatedalarmsystemfornosocomialoutbreakstoprovidesupportforinfectioncontrolprofessionals
AT pieningbrar leanbackandwaitforthealarmtestinganautomatedalarmsystemfornosocomialoutbreakstoprovidesupportforinfectioncontrolprofessionals
AT aghdassisevenjohannessam leanbackandwaitforthealarmtestinganautomatedalarmsystemfornosocomialoutbreakstoprovidesupportforinfectioncontrolprofessionals
AT pilarskigeorg leanbackandwaitforthealarmtestinganautomatedalarmsystemfornosocomialoutbreakstoprovidesupportforinfectioncontrolprofessionals
AT thomanorbert leanbackandwaitforthealarmtestinganautomatedalarmsystemfornosocomialoutbreakstoprovidesupportforinfectioncontrolprofessionals
AT gastmeierpetra leanbackandwaitforthealarmtestinganautomatedalarmsystemfornosocomialoutbreakstoprovidesupportforinfectioncontrolprofessionals
AT leistnerrasmus leanbackandwaitforthealarmtestinganautomatedalarmsystemfornosocomialoutbreakstoprovidesupportforinfectioncontrolprofessionals
AT behnkemichael leanbackandwaitforthealarmtestinganautomatedalarmsystemfornosocomialoutbreakstoprovidesupportforinfectioncontrolprofessionals