Cargando…

ChaRTr: An R toolbox for modeling choices and response times in decision-making tasks

BACKGROUND: Decision-making is the process of choosing and performing actions in response to sensory cues to achieve behavioral goals. Many mathematical models have been developed to describe the choice behavior and response time (RT) distributions of observers performing decision-making tasks. Howe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chandrasekaran, Chandramouli, Hawkins, Guy E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6980795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31586868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108432
_version_ 1783490990854635520
author Chandrasekaran, Chandramouli
Hawkins, Guy E.
author_facet Chandrasekaran, Chandramouli
Hawkins, Guy E.
author_sort Chandrasekaran, Chandramouli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Decision-making is the process of choosing and performing actions in response to sensory cues to achieve behavioral goals. Many mathematical models have been developed to describe the choice behavior and response time (RT) distributions of observers performing decision-making tasks. However, relatively few researchers use these models because it demands expertise in various numerical, statistical, and software techniques. NEW METHOD: We present a toolbox — Choices and Response Times in R, or ChaRTr — that provides the user the ability to implement and test a wide variety of decision-making models ranging from classic through to modern versions of the diffusion decision model, to models with urgency signals, or collapsing boundaries. RESULTS: In three different case studies, we demonstrate how ChaRTr can be used to effortlessly discriminate between multiple models of decision-making behavior. We also provide guidance on how to extend the toolbox to incorporate future developments in decision-making models. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Existing software packages surmounted some of the numerical issues but have often focused on the classical decision-making model, the diffusion decision model. Recent models that posit roles for urgency, time-varying decision thresholds, noise in various aspects of the decision-formation process or low pass filtering of sensory evidence have proven to be challenging to incorporate in a coherent software framework that permits quantitative evaluation among these competing classes of decision-making models. CONCLUSION: ChaRTr can be used to make insightful statements about the cognitive processes underlying observed decision-making behavior and ultimately for deeper insights into decision mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6980795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69807952020-01-24 ChaRTr: An R toolbox for modeling choices and response times in decision-making tasks Chandrasekaran, Chandramouli Hawkins, Guy E. J Neurosci Methods Article BACKGROUND: Decision-making is the process of choosing and performing actions in response to sensory cues to achieve behavioral goals. Many mathematical models have been developed to describe the choice behavior and response time (RT) distributions of observers performing decision-making tasks. However, relatively few researchers use these models because it demands expertise in various numerical, statistical, and software techniques. NEW METHOD: We present a toolbox — Choices and Response Times in R, or ChaRTr — that provides the user the ability to implement and test a wide variety of decision-making models ranging from classic through to modern versions of the diffusion decision model, to models with urgency signals, or collapsing boundaries. RESULTS: In three different case studies, we demonstrate how ChaRTr can be used to effortlessly discriminate between multiple models of decision-making behavior. We also provide guidance on how to extend the toolbox to incorporate future developments in decision-making models. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Existing software packages surmounted some of the numerical issues but have often focused on the classical decision-making model, the diffusion decision model. Recent models that posit roles for urgency, time-varying decision thresholds, noise in various aspects of the decision-formation process or low pass filtering of sensory evidence have proven to be challenging to incorporate in a coherent software framework that permits quantitative evaluation among these competing classes of decision-making models. CONCLUSION: ChaRTr can be used to make insightful statements about the cognitive processes underlying observed decision-making behavior and ultimately for deeper insights into decision mechanisms. 2019-10-03 2019-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6980795/ /pubmed/31586868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108432 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Chandrasekaran, Chandramouli
Hawkins, Guy E.
ChaRTr: An R toolbox for modeling choices and response times in decision-making tasks
title ChaRTr: An R toolbox for modeling choices and response times in decision-making tasks
title_full ChaRTr: An R toolbox for modeling choices and response times in decision-making tasks
title_fullStr ChaRTr: An R toolbox for modeling choices and response times in decision-making tasks
title_full_unstemmed ChaRTr: An R toolbox for modeling choices and response times in decision-making tasks
title_short ChaRTr: An R toolbox for modeling choices and response times in decision-making tasks
title_sort chartr: an r toolbox for modeling choices and response times in decision-making tasks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6980795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31586868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108432
work_keys_str_mv AT chandrasekaranchandramouli chartranrtoolboxformodelingchoicesandresponsetimesindecisionmakingtasks
AT hawkinsguye chartranrtoolboxformodelingchoicesandresponsetimesindecisionmakingtasks