Cargando…
Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies
PURPOSE: Self-administration of topical ophthalmic therapies remains challenging for many patients as errors due to improper technique are common. The aim of the current studies was to evaluate a novel electromechanical topical ocular drug delivery device designed to facilitate precise dosing and ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6980856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021079 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S221749 |
_version_ | 1783491004993634304 |
---|---|
author | Quiroz-Mercado, Hugo Ivri, Ehud Gonzalez-Salinas, Roberto Kourtis, Iraklis C Gilbert, Joseph Pérez-Vázquez, José Francisco Blumenkranz, Mark Jiménez-Román, Jesús Marcellino, George |
author_facet | Quiroz-Mercado, Hugo Ivri, Ehud Gonzalez-Salinas, Roberto Kourtis, Iraklis C Gilbert, Joseph Pérez-Vázquez, José Francisco Blumenkranz, Mark Jiménez-Román, Jesús Marcellino, George |
author_sort | Quiroz-Mercado, Hugo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Self-administration of topical ophthalmic therapies remains challenging for many patients as errors due to improper technique are common. The aim of the current studies was to evaluate a novel electromechanical topical ocular drug delivery device designed to facilitate precise dosing and accurate delivery with substantially lower drug exposure than conventional eye drops. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two randomized Phase 1 studies were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single dose of a topical ophthalmic solution administered as a ~9 μL microfluid stream via the test device compared with a ~30–40 μL drop delivered via conventional dropper in healthy subjects (Trial 1) and glaucoma patients (Trial 2). In Trial 1, a 1% tropicamide/2.5% phenylephrine solution was administered via the test device in one eye and by conventional dropper in the contralateral eye. Pupil dilation was measured at 30 min intervals post-instillation and subject comfort was assessed using a visual analogue scale (range, 0–100). In Trial 2, patients were randomized to receive latanoprost 0.005% via the test device or conventional dropper. Intraocular pressure was measured at baseline and 4–8 hrs post-instillation. RESULTS: In Trial 1 (N=20), mean (SD) pupil diameter 30 mins post-instillation increased by 3.4 (0.9) and 3.5 (1.0) mm in the test and control eyes, respectively. The mean comfort score was 81.7 for the test device versus 57.3 for conventional dropper delivery. In Trial 2 (N=18), the mean change in intraocular pressure following administration of latanoprost was –5.0 (1.8) and –4.3 (3.3) mm Hg in the test and control groups, respectively. No serious adverse events were observed in either study. CONCLUSION: Administration of a single dose of topical ophthalmic therapy via an electromechanical drug delivery device resulted in comparable effects on pupil dilation and intraocular pressure with lower drug exposure and increased patient comfort compared with conventional dropper delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6980856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69808562020-02-04 Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies Quiroz-Mercado, Hugo Ivri, Ehud Gonzalez-Salinas, Roberto Kourtis, Iraklis C Gilbert, Joseph Pérez-Vázquez, José Francisco Blumenkranz, Mark Jiménez-Román, Jesús Marcellino, George Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Self-administration of topical ophthalmic therapies remains challenging for many patients as errors due to improper technique are common. The aim of the current studies was to evaluate a novel electromechanical topical ocular drug delivery device designed to facilitate precise dosing and accurate delivery with substantially lower drug exposure than conventional eye drops. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two randomized Phase 1 studies were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single dose of a topical ophthalmic solution administered as a ~9 μL microfluid stream via the test device compared with a ~30–40 μL drop delivered via conventional dropper in healthy subjects (Trial 1) and glaucoma patients (Trial 2). In Trial 1, a 1% tropicamide/2.5% phenylephrine solution was administered via the test device in one eye and by conventional dropper in the contralateral eye. Pupil dilation was measured at 30 min intervals post-instillation and subject comfort was assessed using a visual analogue scale (range, 0–100). In Trial 2, patients were randomized to receive latanoprost 0.005% via the test device or conventional dropper. Intraocular pressure was measured at baseline and 4–8 hrs post-instillation. RESULTS: In Trial 1 (N=20), mean (SD) pupil diameter 30 mins post-instillation increased by 3.4 (0.9) and 3.5 (1.0) mm in the test and control eyes, respectively. The mean comfort score was 81.7 for the test device versus 57.3 for conventional dropper delivery. In Trial 2 (N=18), the mean change in intraocular pressure following administration of latanoprost was –5.0 (1.8) and –4.3 (3.3) mm Hg in the test and control groups, respectively. No serious adverse events were observed in either study. CONCLUSION: Administration of a single dose of topical ophthalmic therapy via an electromechanical drug delivery device resulted in comparable effects on pupil dilation and intraocular pressure with lower drug exposure and increased patient comfort compared with conventional dropper delivery. Dove 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6980856/ /pubmed/32021079 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S221749 Text en © 2020 Quiroz-Mercado et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Quiroz-Mercado, Hugo Ivri, Ehud Gonzalez-Salinas, Roberto Kourtis, Iraklis C Gilbert, Joseph Pérez-Vázquez, José Francisco Blumenkranz, Mark Jiménez-Román, Jesús Marcellino, George Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies |
title | Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies |
title_full | Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies |
title_fullStr | Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies |
title_short | Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of a novel electromechanical topical ocular drug delivery system: two phase 1 proof of concept studies |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6980856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021079 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S221749 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quirozmercadohugo clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies AT ivriehud clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies AT gonzalezsalinasroberto clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies AT kourtisiraklisc clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies AT gilbertjoseph clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies AT perezvazquezjosefrancisco clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies AT blumenkranzmark clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies AT jimenezromanjesus clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies AT marcellinogeorge clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies |