Cargando…

Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies

PURPOSE: Self-administration of topical ophthalmic therapies remains challenging for many patients as errors due to improper technique are common. The aim of the current studies was to evaluate a novel electromechanical topical ocular drug delivery device designed to facilitate precise dosing and ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quiroz-Mercado, Hugo, Ivri, Ehud, Gonzalez-Salinas, Roberto, Kourtis, Iraklis C, Gilbert, Joseph, Pérez-Vázquez, José Francisco, Blumenkranz, Mark, Jiménez-Román, Jesús, Marcellino, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6980856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021079
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S221749
_version_ 1783491004993634304
author Quiroz-Mercado, Hugo
Ivri, Ehud
Gonzalez-Salinas, Roberto
Kourtis, Iraklis C
Gilbert, Joseph
Pérez-Vázquez, José Francisco
Blumenkranz, Mark
Jiménez-Román, Jesús
Marcellino, George
author_facet Quiroz-Mercado, Hugo
Ivri, Ehud
Gonzalez-Salinas, Roberto
Kourtis, Iraklis C
Gilbert, Joseph
Pérez-Vázquez, José Francisco
Blumenkranz, Mark
Jiménez-Román, Jesús
Marcellino, George
author_sort Quiroz-Mercado, Hugo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Self-administration of topical ophthalmic therapies remains challenging for many patients as errors due to improper technique are common. The aim of the current studies was to evaluate a novel electromechanical topical ocular drug delivery device designed to facilitate precise dosing and accurate delivery with substantially lower drug exposure than conventional eye drops. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two randomized Phase 1 studies were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single dose of a topical ophthalmic solution administered as a ~9 μL microfluid stream via the test device compared with a ~30–40 μL drop delivered via conventional dropper in healthy subjects (Trial 1) and glaucoma patients (Trial 2). In Trial 1, a 1% tropicamide/2.5% phenylephrine solution was administered via the test device in one eye and by conventional dropper in the contralateral eye. Pupil dilation was measured at 30 min intervals post-instillation and subject comfort was assessed using a visual analogue scale (range, 0–100). In Trial 2, patients were randomized to receive latanoprost 0.005% via the test device or conventional dropper. Intraocular pressure was measured at baseline and 4–8 hrs post-instillation. RESULTS: In Trial 1 (N=20), mean (SD) pupil diameter 30 mins post-instillation increased by 3.4 (0.9) and 3.5 (1.0) mm in the test and control eyes, respectively. The mean comfort score was 81.7 for the test device versus 57.3 for conventional dropper delivery. In Trial 2 (N=18), the mean change in intraocular pressure following administration of latanoprost was –5.0 (1.8) and –4.3 (3.3) mm Hg in the test and control groups, respectively. No serious adverse events were observed in either study. CONCLUSION: Administration of a single dose of topical ophthalmic therapy via an electromechanical drug delivery device resulted in comparable effects on pupil dilation and intraocular pressure with lower drug exposure and increased patient comfort compared with conventional dropper delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6980856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69808562020-02-04 Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies Quiroz-Mercado, Hugo Ivri, Ehud Gonzalez-Salinas, Roberto Kourtis, Iraklis C Gilbert, Joseph Pérez-Vázquez, José Francisco Blumenkranz, Mark Jiménez-Román, Jesús Marcellino, George Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Self-administration of topical ophthalmic therapies remains challenging for many patients as errors due to improper technique are common. The aim of the current studies was to evaluate a novel electromechanical topical ocular drug delivery device designed to facilitate precise dosing and accurate delivery with substantially lower drug exposure than conventional eye drops. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two randomized Phase 1 studies were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single dose of a topical ophthalmic solution administered as a ~9 μL microfluid stream via the test device compared with a ~30–40 μL drop delivered via conventional dropper in healthy subjects (Trial 1) and glaucoma patients (Trial 2). In Trial 1, a 1% tropicamide/2.5% phenylephrine solution was administered via the test device in one eye and by conventional dropper in the contralateral eye. Pupil dilation was measured at 30 min intervals post-instillation and subject comfort was assessed using a visual analogue scale (range, 0–100). In Trial 2, patients were randomized to receive latanoprost 0.005% via the test device or conventional dropper. Intraocular pressure was measured at baseline and 4–8 hrs post-instillation. RESULTS: In Trial 1 (N=20), mean (SD) pupil diameter 30 mins post-instillation increased by 3.4 (0.9) and 3.5 (1.0) mm in the test and control eyes, respectively. The mean comfort score was 81.7 for the test device versus 57.3 for conventional dropper delivery. In Trial 2 (N=18), the mean change in intraocular pressure following administration of latanoprost was –5.0 (1.8) and –4.3 (3.3) mm Hg in the test and control groups, respectively. No serious adverse events were observed in either study. CONCLUSION: Administration of a single dose of topical ophthalmic therapy via an electromechanical drug delivery device resulted in comparable effects on pupil dilation and intraocular pressure with lower drug exposure and increased patient comfort compared with conventional dropper delivery. Dove 2020-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6980856/ /pubmed/32021079 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S221749 Text en © 2020 Quiroz-Mercado et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Quiroz-Mercado, Hugo
Ivri, Ehud
Gonzalez-Salinas, Roberto
Kourtis, Iraklis C
Gilbert, Joseph
Pérez-Vázquez, José Francisco
Blumenkranz, Mark
Jiménez-Román, Jesús
Marcellino, George
Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies
title Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies
title_full Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies
title_fullStr Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies
title_short Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Electromechanical Topical Ocular Drug Delivery System: Two Phase 1 Proof of Concept Studies
title_sort clinical evaluation of a novel electromechanical topical ocular drug delivery system: two phase 1 proof of concept studies
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6980856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32021079
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S221749
work_keys_str_mv AT quirozmercadohugo clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies
AT ivriehud clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies
AT gonzalezsalinasroberto clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies
AT kourtisiraklisc clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies
AT gilbertjoseph clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies
AT perezvazquezjosefrancisco clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies
AT blumenkranzmark clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies
AT jimenezromanjesus clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies
AT marcellinogeorge clinicalevaluationofanovelelectromechanicaltopicaloculardrugdeliverysystemtwophase1proofofconceptstudies