Cargando…
Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Motion tracking software for assessing laparoscopic surgical proficiency has been proven to be effective in differentiating between expert and novice performances. However, with several indices that can be generated from the software, there is no set threshold that can be used to benchmark performan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6981315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31980955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-1525-9 |
_version_ | 1783491054886977536 |
---|---|
author | Ganni, Sandeep Botden, Sanne M. B. I. Chmarra, Magdalena Li, Meng Goossens, Richard H. M. Jakimowicz, Jack J. |
author_facet | Ganni, Sandeep Botden, Sanne M. B. I. Chmarra, Magdalena Li, Meng Goossens, Richard H. M. Jakimowicz, Jack J. |
author_sort | Ganni, Sandeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | Motion tracking software for assessing laparoscopic surgical proficiency has been proven to be effective in differentiating between expert and novice performances. However, with several indices that can be generated from the software, there is no set threshold that can be used to benchmark performances. The aim of this study was to identify the best possible algorithm that can be used to benchmark expert, intermediate and novice performances for objective evaluation of psychomotor skills. 12 video recordings of various surgeons were collected in a blinded fashion. Data from our previous study of 6 experts and 23 novices was also included in the analysis to determine thresholds for performance. Video recording were analyzed both by the Kinovea 0.8.15 software and a blinded expert observer using the CAT form. Multiple algorithms were tested to accurately identify expert and novice performances. ½ L + [Formula: see text] A + [Formula: see text] J scoring of path length, average movement and jerk index respectively resulted in identifying 23/24 performances. Comparing the algorithm to CAT assessment yielded in a linear regression coefficient R(2) of 0.844. The value of motion tracking software in providing objective clinical evaluation and retrospective analysis is evident. Given the prospective use of this tool the algorithm developed in this study proves to be effective in benchmarking performances for psychomotor skills evaluation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6981315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69813152020-02-03 Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Ganni, Sandeep Botden, Sanne M. B. I. Chmarra, Magdalena Li, Meng Goossens, Richard H. M. Jakimowicz, Jack J. J Med Syst Education & Training Motion tracking software for assessing laparoscopic surgical proficiency has been proven to be effective in differentiating between expert and novice performances. However, with several indices that can be generated from the software, there is no set threshold that can be used to benchmark performances. The aim of this study was to identify the best possible algorithm that can be used to benchmark expert, intermediate and novice performances for objective evaluation of psychomotor skills. 12 video recordings of various surgeons were collected in a blinded fashion. Data from our previous study of 6 experts and 23 novices was also included in the analysis to determine thresholds for performance. Video recording were analyzed both by the Kinovea 0.8.15 software and a blinded expert observer using the CAT form. Multiple algorithms were tested to accurately identify expert and novice performances. ½ L + [Formula: see text] A + [Formula: see text] J scoring of path length, average movement and jerk index respectively resulted in identifying 23/24 performances. Comparing the algorithm to CAT assessment yielded in a linear regression coefficient R(2) of 0.844. The value of motion tracking software in providing objective clinical evaluation and retrospective analysis is evident. Given the prospective use of this tool the algorithm developed in this study proves to be effective in benchmarking performances for psychomotor skills evaluation. Springer US 2020-01-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6981315/ /pubmed/31980955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-1525-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Education & Training Ganni, Sandeep Botden, Sanne M. B. I. Chmarra, Magdalena Li, Meng Goossens, Richard H. M. Jakimowicz, Jack J. Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title | Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_full | Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_fullStr | Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_short | Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy |
title_sort | validation of motion tracking software for evaluation of surgical performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
topic | Education & Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6981315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31980955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-1525-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gannisandeep validationofmotiontrackingsoftwareforevaluationofsurgicalperformanceinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT botdensannembi validationofmotiontrackingsoftwareforevaluationofsurgicalperformanceinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT chmarramagdalena validationofmotiontrackingsoftwareforevaluationofsurgicalperformanceinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT limeng validationofmotiontrackingsoftwareforevaluationofsurgicalperformanceinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT goossensrichardhm validationofmotiontrackingsoftwareforevaluationofsurgicalperformanceinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy AT jakimowiczjackj validationofmotiontrackingsoftwareforevaluationofsurgicalperformanceinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy |