Cargando…

Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Motion tracking software for assessing laparoscopic surgical proficiency has been proven to be effective in differentiating between expert and novice performances. However, with several indices that can be generated from the software, there is no set threshold that can be used to benchmark performan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganni, Sandeep, Botden, Sanne M. B. I., Chmarra, Magdalena, Li, Meng, Goossens, Richard H. M., Jakimowicz, Jack J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6981315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31980955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-1525-9
_version_ 1783491054886977536
author Ganni, Sandeep
Botden, Sanne M. B. I.
Chmarra, Magdalena
Li, Meng
Goossens, Richard H. M.
Jakimowicz, Jack J.
author_facet Ganni, Sandeep
Botden, Sanne M. B. I.
Chmarra, Magdalena
Li, Meng
Goossens, Richard H. M.
Jakimowicz, Jack J.
author_sort Ganni, Sandeep
collection PubMed
description Motion tracking software for assessing laparoscopic surgical proficiency has been proven to be effective in differentiating between expert and novice performances. However, with several indices that can be generated from the software, there is no set threshold that can be used to benchmark performances. The aim of this study was to identify the best possible algorithm that can be used to benchmark expert, intermediate and novice performances for objective evaluation of psychomotor skills. 12 video recordings of various surgeons were collected in a blinded fashion. Data from our previous study of 6 experts and 23 novices was also included in the analysis to determine thresholds for performance. Video recording were analyzed both by the Kinovea 0.8.15 software and a blinded expert observer using the CAT form. Multiple algorithms were tested to accurately identify expert and novice performances. ½ L + [Formula: see text] A + [Formula: see text]  J scoring of path length, average movement and jerk index respectively resulted in identifying 23/24 performances. Comparing the algorithm to CAT assessment yielded in a linear regression coefficient R(2) of 0.844. The value of motion tracking software in providing objective clinical evaluation and retrospective analysis is evident. Given the prospective use of this tool the algorithm developed in this study proves to be effective in benchmarking performances for psychomotor skills evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6981315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69813152020-02-03 Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Ganni, Sandeep Botden, Sanne M. B. I. Chmarra, Magdalena Li, Meng Goossens, Richard H. M. Jakimowicz, Jack J. J Med Syst Education & Training Motion tracking software for assessing laparoscopic surgical proficiency has been proven to be effective in differentiating between expert and novice performances. However, with several indices that can be generated from the software, there is no set threshold that can be used to benchmark performances. The aim of this study was to identify the best possible algorithm that can be used to benchmark expert, intermediate and novice performances for objective evaluation of psychomotor skills. 12 video recordings of various surgeons were collected in a blinded fashion. Data from our previous study of 6 experts and 23 novices was also included in the analysis to determine thresholds for performance. Video recording were analyzed both by the Kinovea 0.8.15 software and a blinded expert observer using the CAT form. Multiple algorithms were tested to accurately identify expert and novice performances. ½ L + [Formula: see text] A + [Formula: see text]  J scoring of path length, average movement and jerk index respectively resulted in identifying 23/24 performances. Comparing the algorithm to CAT assessment yielded in a linear regression coefficient R(2) of 0.844. The value of motion tracking software in providing objective clinical evaluation and retrospective analysis is evident. Given the prospective use of this tool the algorithm developed in this study proves to be effective in benchmarking performances for psychomotor skills evaluation. Springer US 2020-01-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6981315/ /pubmed/31980955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-1525-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Education & Training
Ganni, Sandeep
Botden, Sanne M. B. I.
Chmarra, Magdalena
Li, Meng
Goossens, Richard H. M.
Jakimowicz, Jack J.
Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_full Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_fullStr Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_full_unstemmed Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_short Validation of Motion Tracking Software for Evaluation of Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
title_sort validation of motion tracking software for evaluation of surgical performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
topic Education & Training
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6981315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31980955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-1525-9
work_keys_str_mv AT gannisandeep validationofmotiontrackingsoftwareforevaluationofsurgicalperformanceinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT botdensannembi validationofmotiontrackingsoftwareforevaluationofsurgicalperformanceinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT chmarramagdalena validationofmotiontrackingsoftwareforevaluationofsurgicalperformanceinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT limeng validationofmotiontrackingsoftwareforevaluationofsurgicalperformanceinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT goossensrichardhm validationofmotiontrackingsoftwareforevaluationofsurgicalperformanceinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy
AT jakimowiczjackj validationofmotiontrackingsoftwareforevaluationofsurgicalperformanceinlaparoscopiccholecystectomy