Cargando…
Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes
Background: Different percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategies, including the use of single long stents (SLSs) and overlapping multiple stents (OMSs), have been introduced to treat very long coronary lesions (VLCLs). The aim of this study was to compare procedural and long-term clinical o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2006-
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6981347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998385 |
_version_ | 1783491060317552640 |
---|---|
author | Amirzadegan, Alireza Hasanabadi, Mahdi Saadatagah, Seyedmohammad Afarideh, Mohsen Omidi, Negar Aghajani, Hassan Alidoosti, Mohammad Pourhosseini, Hamidreza Salarifar, Mojtaba Nozari, Younes |
author_facet | Amirzadegan, Alireza Hasanabadi, Mahdi Saadatagah, Seyedmohammad Afarideh, Mohsen Omidi, Negar Aghajani, Hassan Alidoosti, Mohammad Pourhosseini, Hamidreza Salarifar, Mojtaba Nozari, Younes |
author_sort | Amirzadegan, Alireza |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Different percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategies, including the use of single long stents (SLSs) and overlapping multiple stents (OMSs), have been introduced to treat very long coronary lesions (VLCLs). The aim of this study was to compare procedural and long-term clinical outcomes between SLSs and OMSs in patients with VLCLs. Methods: In this historical cohort study, 1709 patients who underwent PCI with the new generation of drug-eluting stents (length ≥38 mm) were stratified into the SLS [PROMUS /Resolute/XIENCE (PRX), (=38 mm), n=1121 (65.59%) and BioMime, (≥40 mm), n=124 (7.26%)] and OMS [(59.43±10.80 mm), n=464 (27.2%)] groups and followed up for 440.93±361.32 days. The study endpoints comprised immediate post-PCI outcomes, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), and the device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) at the long-term follow-up. Results: The mean age of the patients was 59.28±10.60 years, and 69.6% of them were male. Flow grade 3 (P=0.296) and residual stenosis (P=0.533) were statistically similar between all the groups. A lower level of post-PCI troponin was observed in the BioMime group [14.52 (IQR(25%-75%):10.44–22.42) ng/L; P=0.031] than in the PRX and OMS groups [18.63 (IQR(25%-75%):10.51–34.02) ng/L and 18.96 (IQR(25%-75%):11.17–35.34) ng/L; respectively]. Similarly, the PRX and BioMime groups received lower amounts of the contrast agent [206.29±49.15 mL and 208.06±55.23 mL; respectively] than did the OMS group [265.50±74.69 mL; P<0.001]. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of MACE [81 (7.2%), 7 (5.6%), and 28 (6.0%); P=0.603], the POCE [141 (12.6%), 13 (10.5%), and 54 (11.6%); P=0.731], and the DOCE [51 (4.5%), 4 (3.2%), and 21 (4.5%); P=0.791] between the PRX, BioMime, and OMS groups, respectively. Conclusion: In the treatment of VLCLs, the SLS and OMSs appear to have similar clinical outcomes. BioMime ultra-long stents may have comparable results to PRX coronary stents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6981347 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2006- |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69813472020-01-29 Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes Amirzadegan, Alireza Hasanabadi, Mahdi Saadatagah, Seyedmohammad Afarideh, Mohsen Omidi, Negar Aghajani, Hassan Alidoosti, Mohammad Pourhosseini, Hamidreza Salarifar, Mojtaba Nozari, Younes J Tehran Heart Cent Original Article Background: Different percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategies, including the use of single long stents (SLSs) and overlapping multiple stents (OMSs), have been introduced to treat very long coronary lesions (VLCLs). The aim of this study was to compare procedural and long-term clinical outcomes between SLSs and OMSs in patients with VLCLs. Methods: In this historical cohort study, 1709 patients who underwent PCI with the new generation of drug-eluting stents (length ≥38 mm) were stratified into the SLS [PROMUS /Resolute/XIENCE (PRX), (=38 mm), n=1121 (65.59%) and BioMime, (≥40 mm), n=124 (7.26%)] and OMS [(59.43±10.80 mm), n=464 (27.2%)] groups and followed up for 440.93±361.32 days. The study endpoints comprised immediate post-PCI outcomes, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), and the device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) at the long-term follow-up. Results: The mean age of the patients was 59.28±10.60 years, and 69.6% of them were male. Flow grade 3 (P=0.296) and residual stenosis (P=0.533) were statistically similar between all the groups. A lower level of post-PCI troponin was observed in the BioMime group [14.52 (IQR(25%-75%):10.44–22.42) ng/L; P=0.031] than in the PRX and OMS groups [18.63 (IQR(25%-75%):10.51–34.02) ng/L and 18.96 (IQR(25%-75%):11.17–35.34) ng/L; respectively]. Similarly, the PRX and BioMime groups received lower amounts of the contrast agent [206.29±49.15 mL and 208.06±55.23 mL; respectively] than did the OMS group [265.50±74.69 mL; P<0.001]. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of MACE [81 (7.2%), 7 (5.6%), and 28 (6.0%); P=0.603], the POCE [141 (12.6%), 13 (10.5%), and 54 (11.6%); P=0.731], and the DOCE [51 (4.5%), 4 (3.2%), and 21 (4.5%); P=0.791] between the PRX, BioMime, and OMS groups, respectively. Conclusion: In the treatment of VLCLs, the SLS and OMSs appear to have similar clinical outcomes. BioMime ultra-long stents may have comparable results to PRX coronary stents. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2006- 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6981347/ /pubmed/31998385 Text en Copyright © 2015 Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Amirzadegan, Alireza Hasanabadi, Mahdi Saadatagah, Seyedmohammad Afarideh, Mohsen Omidi, Negar Aghajani, Hassan Alidoosti, Mohammad Pourhosseini, Hamidreza Salarifar, Mojtaba Nozari, Younes Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes |
title | Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes |
title_full | Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes |
title_fullStr | Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes |
title_short | Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes |
title_sort | single long stents versus overlapping multiple stents in the management of very long coronary lesions: comparisons of procedures and clinical outcomes |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6981347/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amirzadeganalireza singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes AT hasanabadimahdi singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes AT saadatagahseyedmohammad singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes AT afaridehmohsen singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes AT omidinegar singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes AT aghajanihassan singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes AT alidoostimohammad singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes AT pourhosseinihamidreza singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes AT salarifarmojtaba singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes AT nozariyounes singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes |