Cargando…

Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes

Background: Different percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategies, including the use of single long stents (SLSs) and overlapping multiple stents (OMSs), have been introduced to treat very long coronary lesions (VLCLs). The aim of this study was to compare procedural and long-term clinical o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amirzadegan, Alireza, Hasanabadi, Mahdi, Saadatagah, Seyedmohammad, Afarideh, Mohsen, Omidi, Negar, Aghajani, Hassan, Alidoosti, Mohammad, Pourhosseini, Hamidreza, Salarifar, Mojtaba, Nozari, Younes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2006- 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6981347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998385
_version_ 1783491060317552640
author Amirzadegan, Alireza
Hasanabadi, Mahdi
Saadatagah, Seyedmohammad
Afarideh, Mohsen
Omidi, Negar
Aghajani, Hassan
Alidoosti, Mohammad
Pourhosseini, Hamidreza
Salarifar, Mojtaba
Nozari, Younes
author_facet Amirzadegan, Alireza
Hasanabadi, Mahdi
Saadatagah, Seyedmohammad
Afarideh, Mohsen
Omidi, Negar
Aghajani, Hassan
Alidoosti, Mohammad
Pourhosseini, Hamidreza
Salarifar, Mojtaba
Nozari, Younes
author_sort Amirzadegan, Alireza
collection PubMed
description Background: Different percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategies, including the use of single long stents (SLSs) and overlapping multiple stents (OMSs), have been introduced to treat very long coronary lesions (VLCLs). The aim of this study was to compare procedural and long-term clinical outcomes between SLSs and OMSs in patients with VLCLs. Methods: In this historical cohort study, 1709 patients who underwent PCI with the new generation of drug-eluting stents (length ≥38 mm) were stratified into the SLS [PROMUS /Resolute/XIENCE (PRX), (=38 mm), n=1121 (65.59%) and BioMime, (≥40 mm), n=124 (7.26%)] and OMS [(59.43±10.80 mm), n=464 (27.2%)] groups and followed up for 440.93±361.32 days. The study endpoints comprised immediate post-PCI outcomes, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), and the device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) at the long-term follow-up. Results: The mean age of the patients was 59.28±10.60 years, and 69.6% of them were male. Flow grade 3 (P=0.296) and residual stenosis (P=0.533) were statistically similar between all the groups. A lower level of post-PCI troponin was observed in the BioMime group [14.52 (IQR(25%-75%):10.44–22.42) ng/L; P=0.031] than in the PRX and OMS groups [18.63 (IQR(25%-75%):10.51–34.02) ng/L and 18.96 (IQR(25%-75%):11.17–35.34) ng/L; respectively]. Similarly, the PRX and BioMime groups received lower amounts of the contrast agent [206.29±49.15 mL and 208.06±55.23 mL; respectively] than did the OMS group [265.50±74.69 mL; P<0.001]. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of MACE [81 (7.2%), 7 (5.6%), and 28 (6.0%); P=0.603], the POCE [141 (12.6%), 13 (10.5%), and 54 (11.6%); P=0.731], and the DOCE [51 (4.5%), 4 (3.2%), and 21 (4.5%); P=0.791] between the PRX, BioMime, and OMS groups, respectively. Conclusion: In the treatment of VLCLs, the SLS and OMSs appear to have similar clinical outcomes. BioMime ultra-long stents may have comparable results to PRX coronary stents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6981347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2006-
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69813472020-01-29 Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes Amirzadegan, Alireza Hasanabadi, Mahdi Saadatagah, Seyedmohammad Afarideh, Mohsen Omidi, Negar Aghajani, Hassan Alidoosti, Mohammad Pourhosseini, Hamidreza Salarifar, Mojtaba Nozari, Younes J Tehran Heart Cent Original Article Background: Different percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategies, including the use of single long stents (SLSs) and overlapping multiple stents (OMSs), have been introduced to treat very long coronary lesions (VLCLs). The aim of this study was to compare procedural and long-term clinical outcomes between SLSs and OMSs in patients with VLCLs. Methods: In this historical cohort study, 1709 patients who underwent PCI with the new generation of drug-eluting stents (length ≥38 mm) were stratified into the SLS [PROMUS /Resolute/XIENCE (PRX), (=38 mm), n=1121 (65.59%) and BioMime, (≥40 mm), n=124 (7.26%)] and OMS [(59.43±10.80 mm), n=464 (27.2%)] groups and followed up for 440.93±361.32 days. The study endpoints comprised immediate post-PCI outcomes, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), and the device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) at the long-term follow-up. Results: The mean age of the patients was 59.28±10.60 years, and 69.6% of them were male. Flow grade 3 (P=0.296) and residual stenosis (P=0.533) were statistically similar between all the groups. A lower level of post-PCI troponin was observed in the BioMime group [14.52 (IQR(25%-75%):10.44–22.42) ng/L; P=0.031] than in the PRX and OMS groups [18.63 (IQR(25%-75%):10.51–34.02) ng/L and 18.96 (IQR(25%-75%):11.17–35.34) ng/L; respectively]. Similarly, the PRX and BioMime groups received lower amounts of the contrast agent [206.29±49.15 mL and 208.06±55.23 mL; respectively] than did the OMS group [265.50±74.69 mL; P<0.001]. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of MACE [81 (7.2%), 7 (5.6%), and 28 (6.0%); P=0.603], the POCE [141 (12.6%), 13 (10.5%), and 54 (11.6%); P=0.731], and the DOCE [51 (4.5%), 4 (3.2%), and 21 (4.5%); P=0.791] between the PRX, BioMime, and OMS groups, respectively. Conclusion: In the treatment of VLCLs, the SLS and OMSs appear to have similar clinical outcomes. BioMime ultra-long stents may have comparable results to PRX coronary stents. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2006- 2019-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6981347/ /pubmed/31998385 Text en Copyright © 2015 Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Amirzadegan, Alireza
Hasanabadi, Mahdi
Saadatagah, Seyedmohammad
Afarideh, Mohsen
Omidi, Negar
Aghajani, Hassan
Alidoosti, Mohammad
Pourhosseini, Hamidreza
Salarifar, Mojtaba
Nozari, Younes
Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes
title Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes
title_full Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes
title_fullStr Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes
title_short Single Long Stents versus Overlapping Multiple Stents in the Management of Very Long Coronary Lesions: Comparisons of Procedures and Clinical Outcomes
title_sort single long stents versus overlapping multiple stents in the management of very long coronary lesions: comparisons of procedures and clinical outcomes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6981347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31998385
work_keys_str_mv AT amirzadeganalireza singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes
AT hasanabadimahdi singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes
AT saadatagahseyedmohammad singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes
AT afaridehmohsen singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes
AT omidinegar singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes
AT aghajanihassan singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes
AT alidoostimohammad singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes
AT pourhosseinihamidreza singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes
AT salarifarmojtaba singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes
AT nozariyounes singlelongstentsversusoverlappingmultiplestentsinthemanagementofverylongcoronarylesionscomparisonsofproceduresandclinicaloutcomes