Cargando…
Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT)
Several studies have demonstrated that training with a laparoscopic simulator improves laparoscopic technical skills. We describe how to build a homemade, low-cost laparoscopic training simulator (LABOT) and its validation as a training instrument. First, sixty surgeons filled out a survey character...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6981870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31906532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010323 |
_version_ | 1783491181891551232 |
---|---|
author | Soriero, Domenico Atzori, Giulia Barra, Fabio Pertile, Davide Massobrio, Andrea Conti, Luigi Gusmini, Dario Epis, Lorenzo Gallo, Maurizio Banchini, Filippo Capelli, Patrizio Penza, Veronica Scabini, Stefano |
author_facet | Soriero, Domenico Atzori, Giulia Barra, Fabio Pertile, Davide Massobrio, Andrea Conti, Luigi Gusmini, Dario Epis, Lorenzo Gallo, Maurizio Banchini, Filippo Capelli, Patrizio Penza, Veronica Scabini, Stefano |
author_sort | Soriero, Domenico |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several studies have demonstrated that training with a laparoscopic simulator improves laparoscopic technical skills. We describe how to build a homemade, low-cost laparoscopic training simulator (LABOT) and its validation as a training instrument. First, sixty surgeons filled out a survey characterized by 12 closed-answer questions about realism, ergonomics, and usefulness for surgical training (global scores ranged from 1—very insufficient to 5—very good). The results of the questionnaires showed a mean (±SD) rating score of 4.18 ± 0.65 for all users. Then, 15 students (group S) and 15 residents (group R) completed 3 different tasks (T1, T2, T3), which were repeated twice to evaluate the execution time and the number of users’ procedural errors. For T1, the R group had a lower mean execution time and a lower rate of procedural errors than the S group; for T2, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time, but the R group had a lower rate of errors; and for T3, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time and rate of errors. On a second attempt, all the participants tended to improve their results in doing these surgical tasks; nevertheless, after subgroup analysis of the T1 results, the S group had a better improvement of both parameters. Our laparoscopic simulator is simple to build, low-cost, easy to use, and seems to be a suitable resource for improving laparoscopic skills. In the future, further studies should evaluate the potential of this laparoscopic box on long-term surgical training with more complex tasks and simulation attempts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6981870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69818702020-02-07 Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT) Soriero, Domenico Atzori, Giulia Barra, Fabio Pertile, Davide Massobrio, Andrea Conti, Luigi Gusmini, Dario Epis, Lorenzo Gallo, Maurizio Banchini, Filippo Capelli, Patrizio Penza, Veronica Scabini, Stefano Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Several studies have demonstrated that training with a laparoscopic simulator improves laparoscopic technical skills. We describe how to build a homemade, low-cost laparoscopic training simulator (LABOT) and its validation as a training instrument. First, sixty surgeons filled out a survey characterized by 12 closed-answer questions about realism, ergonomics, and usefulness for surgical training (global scores ranged from 1—very insufficient to 5—very good). The results of the questionnaires showed a mean (±SD) rating score of 4.18 ± 0.65 for all users. Then, 15 students (group S) and 15 residents (group R) completed 3 different tasks (T1, T2, T3), which were repeated twice to evaluate the execution time and the number of users’ procedural errors. For T1, the R group had a lower mean execution time and a lower rate of procedural errors than the S group; for T2, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time, but the R group had a lower rate of errors; and for T3, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time and rate of errors. On a second attempt, all the participants tended to improve their results in doing these surgical tasks; nevertheless, after subgroup analysis of the T1 results, the S group had a better improvement of both parameters. Our laparoscopic simulator is simple to build, low-cost, easy to use, and seems to be a suitable resource for improving laparoscopic skills. In the future, further studies should evaluate the potential of this laparoscopic box on long-term surgical training with more complex tasks and simulation attempts. MDPI 2020-01-02 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6981870/ /pubmed/31906532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010323 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Soriero, Domenico Atzori, Giulia Barra, Fabio Pertile, Davide Massobrio, Andrea Conti, Luigi Gusmini, Dario Epis, Lorenzo Gallo, Maurizio Banchini, Filippo Capelli, Patrizio Penza, Veronica Scabini, Stefano Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT) |
title | Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT) |
title_full | Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT) |
title_fullStr | Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT) |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT) |
title_short | Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT) |
title_sort | development and validation of a homemade, low-cost laparoscopic simulator for resident surgeons (labot) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6981870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31906532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010323 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sorierodomenico developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot AT atzorigiulia developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot AT barrafabio developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot AT pertiledavide developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot AT massobrioandrea developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot AT contiluigi developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot AT gusminidario developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot AT epislorenzo developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot AT gallomaurizio developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot AT banchinifilippo developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot AT capellipatrizio developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot AT penzaveronica developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot AT scabinistefano developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot |