Cargando…

Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT)

Several studies have demonstrated that training with a laparoscopic simulator improves laparoscopic technical skills. We describe how to build a homemade, low-cost laparoscopic training simulator (LABOT) and its validation as a training instrument. First, sixty surgeons filled out a survey character...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soriero, Domenico, Atzori, Giulia, Barra, Fabio, Pertile, Davide, Massobrio, Andrea, Conti, Luigi, Gusmini, Dario, Epis, Lorenzo, Gallo, Maurizio, Banchini, Filippo, Capelli, Patrizio, Penza, Veronica, Scabini, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6981870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31906532
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010323
_version_ 1783491181891551232
author Soriero, Domenico
Atzori, Giulia
Barra, Fabio
Pertile, Davide
Massobrio, Andrea
Conti, Luigi
Gusmini, Dario
Epis, Lorenzo
Gallo, Maurizio
Banchini, Filippo
Capelli, Patrizio
Penza, Veronica
Scabini, Stefano
author_facet Soriero, Domenico
Atzori, Giulia
Barra, Fabio
Pertile, Davide
Massobrio, Andrea
Conti, Luigi
Gusmini, Dario
Epis, Lorenzo
Gallo, Maurizio
Banchini, Filippo
Capelli, Patrizio
Penza, Veronica
Scabini, Stefano
author_sort Soriero, Domenico
collection PubMed
description Several studies have demonstrated that training with a laparoscopic simulator improves laparoscopic technical skills. We describe how to build a homemade, low-cost laparoscopic training simulator (LABOT) and its validation as a training instrument. First, sixty surgeons filled out a survey characterized by 12 closed-answer questions about realism, ergonomics, and usefulness for surgical training (global scores ranged from 1—very insufficient to 5—very good). The results of the questionnaires showed a mean (±SD) rating score of 4.18 ± 0.65 for all users. Then, 15 students (group S) and 15 residents (group R) completed 3 different tasks (T1, T2, T3), which were repeated twice to evaluate the execution time and the number of users’ procedural errors. For T1, the R group had a lower mean execution time and a lower rate of procedural errors than the S group; for T2, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time, but the R group had a lower rate of errors; and for T3, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time and rate of errors. On a second attempt, all the participants tended to improve their results in doing these surgical tasks; nevertheless, after subgroup analysis of the T1 results, the S group had a better improvement of both parameters. Our laparoscopic simulator is simple to build, low-cost, easy to use, and seems to be a suitable resource for improving laparoscopic skills. In the future, further studies should evaluate the potential of this laparoscopic box on long-term surgical training with more complex tasks and simulation attempts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6981870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69818702020-02-07 Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT) Soriero, Domenico Atzori, Giulia Barra, Fabio Pertile, Davide Massobrio, Andrea Conti, Luigi Gusmini, Dario Epis, Lorenzo Gallo, Maurizio Banchini, Filippo Capelli, Patrizio Penza, Veronica Scabini, Stefano Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Several studies have demonstrated that training with a laparoscopic simulator improves laparoscopic technical skills. We describe how to build a homemade, low-cost laparoscopic training simulator (LABOT) and its validation as a training instrument. First, sixty surgeons filled out a survey characterized by 12 closed-answer questions about realism, ergonomics, and usefulness for surgical training (global scores ranged from 1—very insufficient to 5—very good). The results of the questionnaires showed a mean (±SD) rating score of 4.18 ± 0.65 for all users. Then, 15 students (group S) and 15 residents (group R) completed 3 different tasks (T1, T2, T3), which were repeated twice to evaluate the execution time and the number of users’ procedural errors. For T1, the R group had a lower mean execution time and a lower rate of procedural errors than the S group; for T2, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time, but the R group had a lower rate of errors; and for T3, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time and rate of errors. On a second attempt, all the participants tended to improve their results in doing these surgical tasks; nevertheless, after subgroup analysis of the T1 results, the S group had a better improvement of both parameters. Our laparoscopic simulator is simple to build, low-cost, easy to use, and seems to be a suitable resource for improving laparoscopic skills. In the future, further studies should evaluate the potential of this laparoscopic box on long-term surgical training with more complex tasks and simulation attempts. MDPI 2020-01-02 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6981870/ /pubmed/31906532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010323 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Soriero, Domenico
Atzori, Giulia
Barra, Fabio
Pertile, Davide
Massobrio, Andrea
Conti, Luigi
Gusmini, Dario
Epis, Lorenzo
Gallo, Maurizio
Banchini, Filippo
Capelli, Patrizio
Penza, Veronica
Scabini, Stefano
Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT)
title Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT)
title_full Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT)
title_fullStr Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT)
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT)
title_short Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT)
title_sort development and validation of a homemade, low-cost laparoscopic simulator for resident surgeons (labot)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6981870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31906532
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010323
work_keys_str_mv AT sorierodomenico developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot
AT atzorigiulia developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot
AT barrafabio developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot
AT pertiledavide developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot
AT massobrioandrea developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot
AT contiluigi developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot
AT gusminidario developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot
AT epislorenzo developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot
AT gallomaurizio developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot
AT banchinifilippo developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot
AT capellipatrizio developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot
AT penzaveronica developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot
AT scabinistefano developmentandvalidationofahomemadelowcostlaparoscopicsimulatorforresidentsurgeonslabot