Cargando…

An Eye Tracking Analysis on Diagnostic Performance of Digital Fundus Photography Images between Ophthalmologists and Optometrists

To investigate the parameters of eye movement between ophthalmologists and optometrists while diagnosing digital fundus photographs, sixteen participants (eight ophthalmologists and eight optometrists) were recruited in this study. Every participant’s eye movement during diagnosis of a randomized se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohamad Shahimin, Mizhanim, Razali, Azalia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6982190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861457
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010030
_version_ 1783491258441793536
author Mohamad Shahimin, Mizhanim
Razali, Azalia
author_facet Mohamad Shahimin, Mizhanim
Razali, Azalia
author_sort Mohamad Shahimin, Mizhanim
collection PubMed
description To investigate the parameters of eye movement between ophthalmologists and optometrists while diagnosing digital fundus photographs, sixteen participants (eight ophthalmologists and eight optometrists) were recruited in this study. Every participant’s eye movement during diagnosis of a randomized set of fundus photographs displayed on an eye tracker were recorded. Fixation metrics (duration, count and rate) and scan path patterns were extracted from the eye tracker. These parameters of eye movement and correct diagnosis score were compared between both groups. Correlation analyses between fixation metrics and correct diagnosis score were also performed. Although fixation metrics between ophthalmologists and optometrists were not statistically different (p > 0.05), these parameters were statistically different when compared between different area of interests. Both participant groups had a similar correct diagnosis score. No correlation was found between fixation metrics and correct diagnosis score between both groups, except for total fixation duration and ophthalmologists’ diagnosis score of diabetic retinopathy photographs. The ophthalmologists’ scan paths were simpler, with larger saccades, and were distributed at the middle region of the photographs. Conversely, optometrists’ scan paths were extensive, with shorter saccades covering wider fundus areas, and were accumulated in some unrelated fundus areas. These findings indicated comparable efficiency and systematic visual search patterns between both the groups. Understanding visual search strategy could expedite the creation of a novel training routine for interpretation of ophthalmic diagnostic imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6982190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69821902020-02-07 An Eye Tracking Analysis on Diagnostic Performance of Digital Fundus Photography Images between Ophthalmologists and Optometrists Mohamad Shahimin, Mizhanim Razali, Azalia Int J Environ Res Public Health Article To investigate the parameters of eye movement between ophthalmologists and optometrists while diagnosing digital fundus photographs, sixteen participants (eight ophthalmologists and eight optometrists) were recruited in this study. Every participant’s eye movement during diagnosis of a randomized set of fundus photographs displayed on an eye tracker were recorded. Fixation metrics (duration, count and rate) and scan path patterns were extracted from the eye tracker. These parameters of eye movement and correct diagnosis score were compared between both groups. Correlation analyses between fixation metrics and correct diagnosis score were also performed. Although fixation metrics between ophthalmologists and optometrists were not statistically different (p > 0.05), these parameters were statistically different when compared between different area of interests. Both participant groups had a similar correct diagnosis score. No correlation was found between fixation metrics and correct diagnosis score between both groups, except for total fixation duration and ophthalmologists’ diagnosis score of diabetic retinopathy photographs. The ophthalmologists’ scan paths were simpler, with larger saccades, and were distributed at the middle region of the photographs. Conversely, optometrists’ scan paths were extensive, with shorter saccades covering wider fundus areas, and were accumulated in some unrelated fundus areas. These findings indicated comparable efficiency and systematic visual search patterns between both the groups. Understanding visual search strategy could expedite the creation of a novel training routine for interpretation of ophthalmic diagnostic imaging. MDPI 2019-12-18 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6982190/ /pubmed/31861457 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010030 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mohamad Shahimin, Mizhanim
Razali, Azalia
An Eye Tracking Analysis on Diagnostic Performance of Digital Fundus Photography Images between Ophthalmologists and Optometrists
title An Eye Tracking Analysis on Diagnostic Performance of Digital Fundus Photography Images between Ophthalmologists and Optometrists
title_full An Eye Tracking Analysis on Diagnostic Performance of Digital Fundus Photography Images between Ophthalmologists and Optometrists
title_fullStr An Eye Tracking Analysis on Diagnostic Performance of Digital Fundus Photography Images between Ophthalmologists and Optometrists
title_full_unstemmed An Eye Tracking Analysis on Diagnostic Performance of Digital Fundus Photography Images between Ophthalmologists and Optometrists
title_short An Eye Tracking Analysis on Diagnostic Performance of Digital Fundus Photography Images between Ophthalmologists and Optometrists
title_sort eye tracking analysis on diagnostic performance of digital fundus photography images between ophthalmologists and optometrists
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6982190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31861457
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010030
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamadshahiminmizhanim aneyetrackinganalysisondiagnosticperformanceofdigitalfundusphotographyimagesbetweenophthalmologistsandoptometrists
AT razaliazalia aneyetrackinganalysisondiagnosticperformanceofdigitalfundusphotographyimagesbetweenophthalmologistsandoptometrists
AT mohamadshahiminmizhanim eyetrackinganalysisondiagnosticperformanceofdigitalfundusphotographyimagesbetweenophthalmologistsandoptometrists
AT razaliazalia eyetrackinganalysisondiagnosticperformanceofdigitalfundusphotographyimagesbetweenophthalmologistsandoptometrists