Cargando…

Is Post-Reprocessing Microbiological Surveillance of Duodenoscopes Effective in Reducing the Potential Risk in Transmitting Pathogens?

Background: The use of a contaminated endoscope may lead to infections due to the transmission of potential pathogens from patient to patient. Methods: Post-reprocessing microbiological surveillance of four duodenoscopes was carried out over a three-year period in the Digestive Endoscopy Unit of an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cristina, Maria Luisa, Sartini, Marina, Schinca, Elisa, Ottria, Gianluca, Dupont, Chiara, Bova, Palmira, Coccia, Gianni, Casini, Beatrice, Spagnolo, Anna Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6982321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31878150
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010140
_version_ 1783491288545361920
author Cristina, Maria Luisa
Sartini, Marina
Schinca, Elisa
Ottria, Gianluca
Dupont, Chiara
Bova, Palmira
Coccia, Gianni
Casini, Beatrice
Spagnolo, Anna Maria
author_facet Cristina, Maria Luisa
Sartini, Marina
Schinca, Elisa
Ottria, Gianluca
Dupont, Chiara
Bova, Palmira
Coccia, Gianni
Casini, Beatrice
Spagnolo, Anna Maria
author_sort Cristina, Maria Luisa
collection PubMed
description Background: The use of a contaminated endoscope may lead to infections due to the transmission of potential pathogens from patient to patient. Methods: Post-reprocessing microbiological surveillance of four duodenoscopes was carried out over a three-year period in the Digestive Endoscopy Unit of an Italian hospital. Sampling of duodenoscopes was performed after the devices have been reprocessed. The initial phase of surveillance involved the contemporary evaluation of the four duodenoscopes; afterwards, microbiological surveillance proceeded at monthly intervals. Results: The initial phase of surveillance revealed that three duodenoscopes presented a high level of contamination with “high-concern” micro-organisms, some of which were multi-drug-resistant. The highest values of contamination regarded the species P. aeruginosa (2500 CFU/duodenoscope), K. pneumoniae (2580 CFU/duodenoscope), and A. baumannii (2600 CFU/duodenoscope). Since the cultures were repeatedly positive on three successive occasions, the contaminated devices were sent to the manufacturer for evaluation. Audits were carried out with the personnel responsible for reprocessing, which was aimed to optimize the procedures used, and subsequently, only one case of non-conformity was found. Conclusions: Our study highlighted both the potential risk of transmitting pathogens through the use of duodenoscopes and the importance of implementing a well-structured system of microbiological surveillance and training programs, in order to reduce the risk of spreading retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-associated infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6982321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69823212020-02-07 Is Post-Reprocessing Microbiological Surveillance of Duodenoscopes Effective in Reducing the Potential Risk in Transmitting Pathogens? Cristina, Maria Luisa Sartini, Marina Schinca, Elisa Ottria, Gianluca Dupont, Chiara Bova, Palmira Coccia, Gianni Casini, Beatrice Spagnolo, Anna Maria Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Background: The use of a contaminated endoscope may lead to infections due to the transmission of potential pathogens from patient to patient. Methods: Post-reprocessing microbiological surveillance of four duodenoscopes was carried out over a three-year period in the Digestive Endoscopy Unit of an Italian hospital. Sampling of duodenoscopes was performed after the devices have been reprocessed. The initial phase of surveillance involved the contemporary evaluation of the four duodenoscopes; afterwards, microbiological surveillance proceeded at monthly intervals. Results: The initial phase of surveillance revealed that three duodenoscopes presented a high level of contamination with “high-concern” micro-organisms, some of which were multi-drug-resistant. The highest values of contamination regarded the species P. aeruginosa (2500 CFU/duodenoscope), K. pneumoniae (2580 CFU/duodenoscope), and A. baumannii (2600 CFU/duodenoscope). Since the cultures were repeatedly positive on three successive occasions, the contaminated devices were sent to the manufacturer for evaluation. Audits were carried out with the personnel responsible for reprocessing, which was aimed to optimize the procedures used, and subsequently, only one case of non-conformity was found. Conclusions: Our study highlighted both the potential risk of transmitting pathogens through the use of duodenoscopes and the importance of implementing a well-structured system of microbiological surveillance and training programs, in order to reduce the risk of spreading retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-associated infections. MDPI 2019-12-24 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6982321/ /pubmed/31878150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010140 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cristina, Maria Luisa
Sartini, Marina
Schinca, Elisa
Ottria, Gianluca
Dupont, Chiara
Bova, Palmira
Coccia, Gianni
Casini, Beatrice
Spagnolo, Anna Maria
Is Post-Reprocessing Microbiological Surveillance of Duodenoscopes Effective in Reducing the Potential Risk in Transmitting Pathogens?
title Is Post-Reprocessing Microbiological Surveillance of Duodenoscopes Effective in Reducing the Potential Risk in Transmitting Pathogens?
title_full Is Post-Reprocessing Microbiological Surveillance of Duodenoscopes Effective in Reducing the Potential Risk in Transmitting Pathogens?
title_fullStr Is Post-Reprocessing Microbiological Surveillance of Duodenoscopes Effective in Reducing the Potential Risk in Transmitting Pathogens?
title_full_unstemmed Is Post-Reprocessing Microbiological Surveillance of Duodenoscopes Effective in Reducing the Potential Risk in Transmitting Pathogens?
title_short Is Post-Reprocessing Microbiological Surveillance of Duodenoscopes Effective in Reducing the Potential Risk in Transmitting Pathogens?
title_sort is post-reprocessing microbiological surveillance of duodenoscopes effective in reducing the potential risk in transmitting pathogens?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6982321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31878150
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010140
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinamarialuisa ispostreprocessingmicrobiologicalsurveillanceofduodenoscopeseffectiveinreducingthepotentialriskintransmittingpathogens
AT sartinimarina ispostreprocessingmicrobiologicalsurveillanceofduodenoscopeseffectiveinreducingthepotentialriskintransmittingpathogens
AT schincaelisa ispostreprocessingmicrobiologicalsurveillanceofduodenoscopeseffectiveinreducingthepotentialriskintransmittingpathogens
AT ottriagianluca ispostreprocessingmicrobiologicalsurveillanceofduodenoscopeseffectiveinreducingthepotentialriskintransmittingpathogens
AT dupontchiara ispostreprocessingmicrobiologicalsurveillanceofduodenoscopeseffectiveinreducingthepotentialriskintransmittingpathogens
AT bovapalmira ispostreprocessingmicrobiologicalsurveillanceofduodenoscopeseffectiveinreducingthepotentialriskintransmittingpathogens
AT cocciagianni ispostreprocessingmicrobiologicalsurveillanceofduodenoscopeseffectiveinreducingthepotentialriskintransmittingpathogens
AT casinibeatrice ispostreprocessingmicrobiologicalsurveillanceofduodenoscopeseffectiveinreducingthepotentialriskintransmittingpathogens
AT spagnoloannamaria ispostreprocessingmicrobiologicalsurveillanceofduodenoscopeseffectiveinreducingthepotentialriskintransmittingpathogens