Cargando…
Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants
Musculoskeletal disorders are becoming an ever-growing societal burden and, as a result, millions of bone replacements surgeries are performed per year worldwide. Despite total joint replacements being recognized among the most successful surgeries of the last century, implant failure rates exceedin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6982938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31878028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20010104 |
_version_ | 1783491404309200896 |
---|---|
author | Cachão, João Henrique Soares dos Santos, Marco P. Bernardo, Rodrigo Ramos, António Bader, Rainer Ferreira, Jorge A. F. Torres Marques, António Simões, José A. O. |
author_facet | Cachão, João Henrique Soares dos Santos, Marco P. Bernardo, Rodrigo Ramos, António Bader, Rainer Ferreira, Jorge A. F. Torres Marques, António Simões, José A. O. |
author_sort | Cachão, João Henrique |
collection | PubMed |
description | Musculoskeletal disorders are becoming an ever-growing societal burden and, as a result, millions of bone replacements surgeries are performed per year worldwide. Despite total joint replacements being recognized among the most successful surgeries of the last century, implant failure rates exceeding 10% are still reported. These numbers highlight the necessity of technologies to provide an accurate monitoring of the bone–implant interface state. This study provides a detailed review of the most relevant methodologies and technologies already proposed to monitor the loosening states of endoprosthetic implants, as well as their performance and experimental validation. A total of forty-two papers describing both intracorporeal and extracorporeal technologies for cemented or cementless fixation were thoroughly analyzed. Thirty-eight technologies were identified, which are categorized into five methodologies: vibrometric, acoustic, bioelectric impedance, magnetic induction, and strain. Research efforts were mainly focused on vibrometric and acoustic technologies. Differently, approaches based on bioelectric impedance, magnetic induction and strain have been less explored. Although most technologies are noninvasive and are able to monitor different loosening stages of endoprosthetic implants, they are not able to provide effective monitoring during daily living of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6982938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69829382020-02-06 Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants Cachão, João Henrique Soares dos Santos, Marco P. Bernardo, Rodrigo Ramos, António Bader, Rainer Ferreira, Jorge A. F. Torres Marques, António Simões, José A. O. Sensors (Basel) Review Musculoskeletal disorders are becoming an ever-growing societal burden and, as a result, millions of bone replacements surgeries are performed per year worldwide. Despite total joint replacements being recognized among the most successful surgeries of the last century, implant failure rates exceeding 10% are still reported. These numbers highlight the necessity of technologies to provide an accurate monitoring of the bone–implant interface state. This study provides a detailed review of the most relevant methodologies and technologies already proposed to monitor the loosening states of endoprosthetic implants, as well as their performance and experimental validation. A total of forty-two papers describing both intracorporeal and extracorporeal technologies for cemented or cementless fixation were thoroughly analyzed. Thirty-eight technologies were identified, which are categorized into five methodologies: vibrometric, acoustic, bioelectric impedance, magnetic induction, and strain. Research efforts were mainly focused on vibrometric and acoustic technologies. Differently, approaches based on bioelectric impedance, magnetic induction and strain have been less explored. Although most technologies are noninvasive and are able to monitor different loosening stages of endoprosthetic implants, they are not able to provide effective monitoring during daily living of patients. MDPI 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6982938/ /pubmed/31878028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20010104 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Cachão, João Henrique Soares dos Santos, Marco P. Bernardo, Rodrigo Ramos, António Bader, Rainer Ferreira, Jorge A. F. Torres Marques, António Simões, José A. O. Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants |
title | Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants |
title_full | Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants |
title_fullStr | Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants |
title_full_unstemmed | Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants |
title_short | Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants |
title_sort | altering the course of technologies to monitor loosening states of endoprosthetic implants |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6982938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31878028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20010104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cachaojoaohenrique alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants AT soaresdossantosmarcop alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants AT bernardorodrigo alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants AT ramosantonio alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants AT baderrainer alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants AT ferreirajorgeaf alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants AT torresmarquesantonio alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants AT simoesjoseao alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants |