Cargando…

Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants

Musculoskeletal disorders are becoming an ever-growing societal burden and, as a result, millions of bone replacements surgeries are performed per year worldwide. Despite total joint replacements being recognized among the most successful surgeries of the last century, implant failure rates exceedin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cachão, João Henrique, Soares dos Santos, Marco P., Bernardo, Rodrigo, Ramos, António, Bader, Rainer, Ferreira, Jorge A. F., Torres Marques, António, Simões, José A. O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6982938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31878028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20010104
_version_ 1783491404309200896
author Cachão, João Henrique
Soares dos Santos, Marco P.
Bernardo, Rodrigo
Ramos, António
Bader, Rainer
Ferreira, Jorge A. F.
Torres Marques, António
Simões, José A. O.
author_facet Cachão, João Henrique
Soares dos Santos, Marco P.
Bernardo, Rodrigo
Ramos, António
Bader, Rainer
Ferreira, Jorge A. F.
Torres Marques, António
Simões, José A. O.
author_sort Cachão, João Henrique
collection PubMed
description Musculoskeletal disorders are becoming an ever-growing societal burden and, as a result, millions of bone replacements surgeries are performed per year worldwide. Despite total joint replacements being recognized among the most successful surgeries of the last century, implant failure rates exceeding 10% are still reported. These numbers highlight the necessity of technologies to provide an accurate monitoring of the bone–implant interface state. This study provides a detailed review of the most relevant methodologies and technologies already proposed to monitor the loosening states of endoprosthetic implants, as well as their performance and experimental validation. A total of forty-two papers describing both intracorporeal and extracorporeal technologies for cemented or cementless fixation were thoroughly analyzed. Thirty-eight technologies were identified, which are categorized into five methodologies: vibrometric, acoustic, bioelectric impedance, magnetic induction, and strain. Research efforts were mainly focused on vibrometric and acoustic technologies. Differently, approaches based on bioelectric impedance, magnetic induction and strain have been less explored. Although most technologies are noninvasive and are able to monitor different loosening stages of endoprosthetic implants, they are not able to provide effective monitoring during daily living of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6982938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69829382020-02-06 Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants Cachão, João Henrique Soares dos Santos, Marco P. Bernardo, Rodrigo Ramos, António Bader, Rainer Ferreira, Jorge A. F. Torres Marques, António Simões, José A. O. Sensors (Basel) Review Musculoskeletal disorders are becoming an ever-growing societal burden and, as a result, millions of bone replacements surgeries are performed per year worldwide. Despite total joint replacements being recognized among the most successful surgeries of the last century, implant failure rates exceeding 10% are still reported. These numbers highlight the necessity of technologies to provide an accurate monitoring of the bone–implant interface state. This study provides a detailed review of the most relevant methodologies and technologies already proposed to monitor the loosening states of endoprosthetic implants, as well as their performance and experimental validation. A total of forty-two papers describing both intracorporeal and extracorporeal technologies for cemented or cementless fixation were thoroughly analyzed. Thirty-eight technologies were identified, which are categorized into five methodologies: vibrometric, acoustic, bioelectric impedance, magnetic induction, and strain. Research efforts were mainly focused on vibrometric and acoustic technologies. Differently, approaches based on bioelectric impedance, magnetic induction and strain have been less explored. Although most technologies are noninvasive and are able to monitor different loosening stages of endoprosthetic implants, they are not able to provide effective monitoring during daily living of patients. MDPI 2019-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6982938/ /pubmed/31878028 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20010104 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Cachão, João Henrique
Soares dos Santos, Marco P.
Bernardo, Rodrigo
Ramos, António
Bader, Rainer
Ferreira, Jorge A. F.
Torres Marques, António
Simões, José A. O.
Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants
title Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants
title_full Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants
title_fullStr Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants
title_full_unstemmed Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants
title_short Altering the Course of Technologies to Monitor Loosening States of Endoprosthetic Implants
title_sort altering the course of technologies to monitor loosening states of endoprosthetic implants
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6982938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31878028
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20010104
work_keys_str_mv AT cachaojoaohenrique alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants
AT soaresdossantosmarcop alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants
AT bernardorodrigo alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants
AT ramosantonio alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants
AT baderrainer alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants
AT ferreirajorgeaf alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants
AT torresmarquesantonio alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants
AT simoesjoseao alteringthecourseoftechnologiestomonitorlooseningstatesofendoprostheticimplants