Cargando…

Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification

Inertial sensors are a useful instrument for long term monitoring in healthcare. In many cases, inertial sensor devices can be worn as an accessory or integrated into smart textiles. In some situations, it may be beneficial to have data from multiple inertial sensors, rather than relying on a single...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayasinghe, Udeni, Harwin, William S., Hwang, Faustina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6983049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31877780
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20010082
_version_ 1783491430267748352
author Jayasinghe, Udeni
Harwin, William S.
Hwang, Faustina
author_facet Jayasinghe, Udeni
Harwin, William S.
Hwang, Faustina
author_sort Jayasinghe, Udeni
collection PubMed
description Inertial sensors are a useful instrument for long term monitoring in healthcare. In many cases, inertial sensor devices can be worn as an accessory or integrated into smart textiles. In some situations, it may be beneficial to have data from multiple inertial sensors, rather than relying on a single worn sensor, since this may increase the accuracy of the analysis and better tolerate sensor errors. Integrating multiple sensors into clothing improves the feasibility and practicality of wearing multiple devices every day, in approximately the same location, with less likelihood of incorrect sensor orientation. To facilitate this, the current work investigates the consequences of attaching lightweight sensors to loose clothes. The intention of this paper is to discuss how data from these clothing sensors compare with similarly placed body worn sensors, with additional consideration of the resulting effects on activity recognition. This study compares the similarity between the two signals (body worn and clothing), collected from three different clothing types (slacks, pencil skirt and loose frock), across multiple daily activities (walking, running, sitting, and riding a bus) by calculating correlation coefficients for each sensor pair. Even though the two data streams are clearly different from each other, the results indicate that there is good potential of achieving high classification accuracy when using inertial sensors in clothing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6983049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69830492020-02-06 Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification Jayasinghe, Udeni Harwin, William S. Hwang, Faustina Sensors (Basel) Article Inertial sensors are a useful instrument for long term monitoring in healthcare. In many cases, inertial sensor devices can be worn as an accessory or integrated into smart textiles. In some situations, it may be beneficial to have data from multiple inertial sensors, rather than relying on a single worn sensor, since this may increase the accuracy of the analysis and better tolerate sensor errors. Integrating multiple sensors into clothing improves the feasibility and practicality of wearing multiple devices every day, in approximately the same location, with less likelihood of incorrect sensor orientation. To facilitate this, the current work investigates the consequences of attaching lightweight sensors to loose clothes. The intention of this paper is to discuss how data from these clothing sensors compare with similarly placed body worn sensors, with additional consideration of the resulting effects on activity recognition. This study compares the similarity between the two signals (body worn and clothing), collected from three different clothing types (slacks, pencil skirt and loose frock), across multiple daily activities (walking, running, sitting, and riding a bus) by calculating correlation coefficients for each sensor pair. Even though the two data streams are clearly different from each other, the results indicate that there is good potential of achieving high classification accuracy when using inertial sensors in clothing. MDPI 2019-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6983049/ /pubmed/31877780 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20010082 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jayasinghe, Udeni
Harwin, William S.
Hwang, Faustina
Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification
title Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification
title_full Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification
title_fullStr Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification
title_short Comparing Clothing-Mounted Sensors with Wearable Sensors for Movement Analysis and Activity Classification
title_sort comparing clothing-mounted sensors with wearable sensors for movement analysis and activity classification
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6983049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31877780
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20010082
work_keys_str_mv AT jayasingheudeni comparingclothingmountedsensorswithwearablesensorsformovementanalysisandactivityclassification
AT harwinwilliams comparingclothingmountedsensorswithwearablesensorsformovementanalysisandactivityclassification
AT hwangfaustina comparingclothingmountedsensorswithwearablesensorsformovementanalysisandactivityclassification