Cargando…

Comparison of the anesthetic effect by the injection route of mixed anesthesia (medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol) and the effect of this anesthetic agent on the respiratory function

Recently, a mixture of medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol (MMB) has been used as an injectable general anesthetic agent for laboratory animals. The purpose of this study was to establish data to encourage practical usage of MMB, and to clarify the effects of MMB on the respiratory function in r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: SHIBUTA, Hiromi, YAMANA, Rei, KASHIMOTO, Junko, KAMIO, Kyohei, SUDA, Akiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6983670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31748444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.19-0438
_version_ 1783491545862766592
author SHIBUTA, Hiromi
YAMANA, Rei
KASHIMOTO, Junko
KAMIO, Kyohei
SUDA, Akiko
author_facet SHIBUTA, Hiromi
YAMANA, Rei
KASHIMOTO, Junko
KAMIO, Kyohei
SUDA, Akiko
author_sort SHIBUTA, Hiromi
collection PubMed
description Recently, a mixture of medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol (MMB) has been used as an injectable general anesthetic agent for laboratory animals. The purpose of this study was to establish data to encourage practical usage of MMB, and to clarify the effects of MMB on the respiratory function in rats. To compare the anesthetic efficacy between the injection routes, the anesthetic effects of MMB by subcutaneous (s.c.) or intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection were evaluated in rats. To assess the respiratory function, the blood gas parameters and electrolytes were assessed in serial venous blood samples collected from before s.c. injection of MMB to 270 min after the injection. Recovery from anesthesia and the respiratory changes after atipamezole injection at 30 min after MMB injection was also examined. Subcutaneous injection of MMB was associated with more rapid induction and a longer duration of anesthesia as compared to i.p. injection. The blood gas analysis findings showed MMB had effects on respiratory function, that is, elevations of the partial pressures of carbon dioxide and bicarbonate and reduction of the blood pH. Atipamezole injection resulted in recovery from the MMB-induced anesthetic effect as well as respiratory depression. In conclusion, MMB provides more effective anesthesia administered by s.c. injection compared to i.p. injection and induces respiratory change. These changes were counteracted by atipamezole. Therefore, we recommend MMB administered by s.c. injection for anesthesia, followed by injection of atipamezole after the operative procedure to allow recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6983670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69836702020-01-30 Comparison of the anesthetic effect by the injection route of mixed anesthesia (medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol) and the effect of this anesthetic agent on the respiratory function SHIBUTA, Hiromi YAMANA, Rei KASHIMOTO, Junko KAMIO, Kyohei SUDA, Akiko J Vet Med Sci Laboratory Animal Science Recently, a mixture of medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol (MMB) has been used as an injectable general anesthetic agent for laboratory animals. The purpose of this study was to establish data to encourage practical usage of MMB, and to clarify the effects of MMB on the respiratory function in rats. To compare the anesthetic efficacy between the injection routes, the anesthetic effects of MMB by subcutaneous (s.c.) or intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection were evaluated in rats. To assess the respiratory function, the blood gas parameters and electrolytes were assessed in serial venous blood samples collected from before s.c. injection of MMB to 270 min after the injection. Recovery from anesthesia and the respiratory changes after atipamezole injection at 30 min after MMB injection was also examined. Subcutaneous injection of MMB was associated with more rapid induction and a longer duration of anesthesia as compared to i.p. injection. The blood gas analysis findings showed MMB had effects on respiratory function, that is, elevations of the partial pressures of carbon dioxide and bicarbonate and reduction of the blood pH. Atipamezole injection resulted in recovery from the MMB-induced anesthetic effect as well as respiratory depression. In conclusion, MMB provides more effective anesthesia administered by s.c. injection compared to i.p. injection and induces respiratory change. These changes were counteracted by atipamezole. Therefore, we recommend MMB administered by s.c. injection for anesthesia, followed by injection of atipamezole after the operative procedure to allow recovery. The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science 2019-11-21 2020-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6983670/ /pubmed/31748444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.19-0438 Text en ©2020 The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Laboratory Animal Science
SHIBUTA, Hiromi
YAMANA, Rei
KASHIMOTO, Junko
KAMIO, Kyohei
SUDA, Akiko
Comparison of the anesthetic effect by the injection route of mixed anesthesia (medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol) and the effect of this anesthetic agent on the respiratory function
title Comparison of the anesthetic effect by the injection route of mixed anesthesia (medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol) and the effect of this anesthetic agent on the respiratory function
title_full Comparison of the anesthetic effect by the injection route of mixed anesthesia (medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol) and the effect of this anesthetic agent on the respiratory function
title_fullStr Comparison of the anesthetic effect by the injection route of mixed anesthesia (medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol) and the effect of this anesthetic agent on the respiratory function
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the anesthetic effect by the injection route of mixed anesthesia (medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol) and the effect of this anesthetic agent on the respiratory function
title_short Comparison of the anesthetic effect by the injection route of mixed anesthesia (medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol) and the effect of this anesthetic agent on the respiratory function
title_sort comparison of the anesthetic effect by the injection route of mixed anesthesia (medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol) and the effect of this anesthetic agent on the respiratory function
topic Laboratory Animal Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6983670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31748444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1292/jvms.19-0438
work_keys_str_mv AT shibutahiromi comparisonoftheanestheticeffectbytheinjectionrouteofmixedanesthesiamedetomidinemidazolamandbutorphanolandtheeffectofthisanestheticagentontherespiratoryfunction
AT yamanarei comparisonoftheanestheticeffectbytheinjectionrouteofmixedanesthesiamedetomidinemidazolamandbutorphanolandtheeffectofthisanestheticagentontherespiratoryfunction
AT kashimotojunko comparisonoftheanestheticeffectbytheinjectionrouteofmixedanesthesiamedetomidinemidazolamandbutorphanolandtheeffectofthisanestheticagentontherespiratoryfunction
AT kamiokyohei comparisonoftheanestheticeffectbytheinjectionrouteofmixedanesthesiamedetomidinemidazolamandbutorphanolandtheeffectofthisanestheticagentontherespiratoryfunction
AT sudaakiko comparisonoftheanestheticeffectbytheinjectionrouteofmixedanesthesiamedetomidinemidazolamandbutorphanolandtheeffectofthisanestheticagentontherespiratoryfunction