Cargando…
Antibody validation for Western blot: By the user, for the user
Well-characterized antibody reagents play a key role in the reproducibility of research findings, and inconsistent antibody performance leads to variability in Western blotting and other immunoassays. The current lack of clear, accepted standards for antibody validation and reporting of experimental...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6983856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.010472 |
_version_ | 1783491574207873024 |
---|---|
author | Pillai-Kastoori, Lakshmi Heaton, Sam Shiflett, Steve D. Roberts, Annabelle C. Solache, Alejandra Schutz-Geschwender, Amy R. |
author_facet | Pillai-Kastoori, Lakshmi Heaton, Sam Shiflett, Steve D. Roberts, Annabelle C. Solache, Alejandra Schutz-Geschwender, Amy R. |
author_sort | Pillai-Kastoori, Lakshmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Well-characterized antibody reagents play a key role in the reproducibility of research findings, and inconsistent antibody performance leads to variability in Western blotting and other immunoassays. The current lack of clear, accepted standards for antibody validation and reporting of experimental details contributes to this problem. Because the performance of primary antibodies is strongly influenced by assay context, recommendations for validation and usage are unique to each type of immunoassay. Practical strategies are proposed for the validation of primary antibody specificity, selectivity, and reproducibility using Western blot analysis. The antibody should produce reproducible results within and between Western blotting experiments and the observed effect confirmed with a complementary or orthogonal method. Routine implementation of standardized antibody validation and reporting in immunoassays such as Western blotting may promote improved reproducibility across the global life sciences community. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6983856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69838562020-01-28 Antibody validation for Western blot: By the user, for the user Pillai-Kastoori, Lakshmi Heaton, Sam Shiflett, Steve D. Roberts, Annabelle C. Solache, Alejandra Schutz-Geschwender, Amy R. J Biol Chem Methods and Resources Well-characterized antibody reagents play a key role in the reproducibility of research findings, and inconsistent antibody performance leads to variability in Western blotting and other immunoassays. The current lack of clear, accepted standards for antibody validation and reporting of experimental details contributes to this problem. Because the performance of primary antibodies is strongly influenced by assay context, recommendations for validation and usage are unique to each type of immunoassay. Practical strategies are proposed for the validation of primary antibody specificity, selectivity, and reproducibility using Western blot analysis. The antibody should produce reproducible results within and between Western blotting experiments and the observed effect confirmed with a complementary or orthogonal method. Routine implementation of standardized antibody validation and reporting in immunoassays such as Western blotting may promote improved reproducibility across the global life sciences community. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2020-01-24 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6983856/ /pubmed/31819006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.010472 Text en © 2020 Pillai-Kastoori et al. Author's Choice—Final version open access under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) . |
spellingShingle | Methods and Resources Pillai-Kastoori, Lakshmi Heaton, Sam Shiflett, Steve D. Roberts, Annabelle C. Solache, Alejandra Schutz-Geschwender, Amy R. Antibody validation for Western blot: By the user, for the user |
title | Antibody validation for Western blot: By the user, for the user |
title_full | Antibody validation for Western blot: By the user, for the user |
title_fullStr | Antibody validation for Western blot: By the user, for the user |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibody validation for Western blot: By the user, for the user |
title_short | Antibody validation for Western blot: By the user, for the user |
title_sort | antibody validation for western blot: by the user, for the user |
topic | Methods and Resources |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6983856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31819006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA119.010472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pillaikastoorilakshmi antibodyvalidationforwesternblotbytheuserfortheuser AT heatonsam antibodyvalidationforwesternblotbytheuserfortheuser AT shiflettsteved antibodyvalidationforwesternblotbytheuserfortheuser AT robertsannabellec antibodyvalidationforwesternblotbytheuserfortheuser AT solachealejandra antibodyvalidationforwesternblotbytheuserfortheuser AT schutzgeschwenderamyr antibodyvalidationforwesternblotbytheuserfortheuser |