Cargando…

Radiofrequency Microdebridement as an Adjunct to Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment for Recalcitrant Gluteal Tendinopathy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Recalcitrant greater trochanteric pain is increasingly recognized as an indication for surgical intervention. The arthroscopic approach has become rapidly more common than the open alternative. HYPOTHESIS: Patients undergoing radiofrequency microdebridement (RFMD) as an adjunct to arthro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blakey, Caroline M., O’Donnell, John, Klaber, Ianiv, Singh, Parminder, Arora, Manit, Takla, Amir, Fitzpatrick, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6984435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32047828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119895602
_version_ 1783491651926228992
author Blakey, Caroline M.
O’Donnell, John
Klaber, Ianiv
Singh, Parminder
Arora, Manit
Takla, Amir
Fitzpatrick, Jane
author_facet Blakey, Caroline M.
O’Donnell, John
Klaber, Ianiv
Singh, Parminder
Arora, Manit
Takla, Amir
Fitzpatrick, Jane
author_sort Blakey, Caroline M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recalcitrant greater trochanteric pain is increasingly recognized as an indication for surgical intervention. The arthroscopic approach has become rapidly more common than the open alternative. HYPOTHESIS: Patients undergoing radiofrequency microdebridement (RFMD) as an adjunct to arthroscopic gluteal bursectomy (AGB) and iliotibial band release (ITBR) will experience better functional improvement than AGB and ITBR alone at 1 year. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 33 patients with failed nonoperative treatment of gluteal tendinopathy were randomly allocated to undergo AGB/ITBR or AGB/ITBR + RFMD. Full-thickness tears were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) at 52 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included the mHHS, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), which were evaluated at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 33 participants (33 hips; 30 female and 3 male; mean age, 58 years) were randomized; 16 patients underwent AGB/ITBR + RFMD, and 17 underwent AGB/ITBR. Participants’ functionality improved in both groups at all time intervals. The mean mHHS score improved from 57.49 ± 10.61 to 77.76 ± 18.40 (P = .004) and from 58.98 ± 12.33 to 79.96 ± 18.86 (P = .001) at 52 weeks in the AGB/ITBR and AGB/ITBR + RFMD groups, respectively, although there was no statistically significant difference between groups. There were no device-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: AGB/ITBR led to significant improvements in patients with recalcitrant gluteal tendinopathy. In this small RCT, the addition of RFMD showed no additional benefit to AGB/ITBR but provided a safe adjunct for the surgical management of recalcitrant gluteal tendinopathy. REGISTRATION: NCT01562366 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6984435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69844352020-02-11 Radiofrequency Microdebridement as an Adjunct to Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment for Recalcitrant Gluteal Tendinopathy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial Blakey, Caroline M. O’Donnell, John Klaber, Ianiv Singh, Parminder Arora, Manit Takla, Amir Fitzpatrick, Jane Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Recalcitrant greater trochanteric pain is increasingly recognized as an indication for surgical intervention. The arthroscopic approach has become rapidly more common than the open alternative. HYPOTHESIS: Patients undergoing radiofrequency microdebridement (RFMD) as an adjunct to arthroscopic gluteal bursectomy (AGB) and iliotibial band release (ITBR) will experience better functional improvement than AGB and ITBR alone at 1 year. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 33 patients with failed nonoperative treatment of gluteal tendinopathy were randomly allocated to undergo AGB/ITBR or AGB/ITBR + RFMD. Full-thickness tears were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) at 52 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included the mHHS, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), which were evaluated at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 33 participants (33 hips; 30 female and 3 male; mean age, 58 years) were randomized; 16 patients underwent AGB/ITBR + RFMD, and 17 underwent AGB/ITBR. Participants’ functionality improved in both groups at all time intervals. The mean mHHS score improved from 57.49 ± 10.61 to 77.76 ± 18.40 (P = .004) and from 58.98 ± 12.33 to 79.96 ± 18.86 (P = .001) at 52 weeks in the AGB/ITBR and AGB/ITBR + RFMD groups, respectively, although there was no statistically significant difference between groups. There were no device-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: AGB/ITBR led to significant improvements in patients with recalcitrant gluteal tendinopathy. In this small RCT, the addition of RFMD showed no additional benefit to AGB/ITBR but provided a safe adjunct for the surgical management of recalcitrant gluteal tendinopathy. REGISTRATION: NCT01562366 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier). SAGE Publications 2020-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6984435/ /pubmed/32047828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119895602 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Blakey, Caroline M.
O’Donnell, John
Klaber, Ianiv
Singh, Parminder
Arora, Manit
Takla, Amir
Fitzpatrick, Jane
Radiofrequency Microdebridement as an Adjunct to Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment for Recalcitrant Gluteal Tendinopathy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title Radiofrequency Microdebridement as an Adjunct to Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment for Recalcitrant Gluteal Tendinopathy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Radiofrequency Microdebridement as an Adjunct to Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment for Recalcitrant Gluteal Tendinopathy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Radiofrequency Microdebridement as an Adjunct to Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment for Recalcitrant Gluteal Tendinopathy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Radiofrequency Microdebridement as an Adjunct to Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment for Recalcitrant Gluteal Tendinopathy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Radiofrequency Microdebridement as an Adjunct to Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment for Recalcitrant Gluteal Tendinopathy: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort radiofrequency microdebridement as an adjunct to arthroscopic surgical treatment for recalcitrant gluteal tendinopathy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6984435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32047828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119895602
work_keys_str_mv AT blakeycarolinem radiofrequencymicrodebridementasanadjuncttoarthroscopicsurgicaltreatmentforrecalcitrantglutealtendinopathyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT odonnelljohn radiofrequencymicrodebridementasanadjuncttoarthroscopicsurgicaltreatmentforrecalcitrantglutealtendinopathyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT klaberianiv radiofrequencymicrodebridementasanadjuncttoarthroscopicsurgicaltreatmentforrecalcitrantglutealtendinopathyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT singhparminder radiofrequencymicrodebridementasanadjuncttoarthroscopicsurgicaltreatmentforrecalcitrantglutealtendinopathyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aroramanit radiofrequencymicrodebridementasanadjuncttoarthroscopicsurgicaltreatmentforrecalcitrantglutealtendinopathyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT taklaamir radiofrequencymicrodebridementasanadjuncttoarthroscopicsurgicaltreatmentforrecalcitrantglutealtendinopathyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fitzpatrickjane radiofrequencymicrodebridementasanadjuncttoarthroscopicsurgicaltreatmentforrecalcitrantglutealtendinopathyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial