Cargando…

Standardized framework for evaluating costs of active case-finding programs: An analysis of two programs in Cambodia and Tajikistan

INTRODUCTION: Over the years, technological and process innovations enabled active case finding (ACF) programs to expand their capacities and scope to have evolved to close gaps in missing TB patients globally. However, with increased ACF program’s operational complexity and a need for significant r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jo, Youngji, Mirzoeva, Farangiz, Chry, Monyrath, Qin, Zhi Zhen, Codlin, Andrew, Bobokhojaev, Oktam, Creswell, Jacob, Sohn, Hojoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6984737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31986183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228216
_version_ 1783491687164674048
author Jo, Youngji
Mirzoeva, Farangiz
Chry, Monyrath
Qin, Zhi Zhen
Codlin, Andrew
Bobokhojaev, Oktam
Creswell, Jacob
Sohn, Hojoon
author_facet Jo, Youngji
Mirzoeva, Farangiz
Chry, Monyrath
Qin, Zhi Zhen
Codlin, Andrew
Bobokhojaev, Oktam
Creswell, Jacob
Sohn, Hojoon
author_sort Jo, Youngji
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Over the years, technological and process innovations enabled active case finding (ACF) programs to expand their capacities and scope to have evolved to close gaps in missing TB patients globally. However, with increased ACF program’s operational complexity and a need for significant resource commitments, a comprehensive, transparent, and standardized approach in evaluating costs of ACF programs is needed to properly determine costs and value of ACF programs. METHODS: Based on reviews of program activity and financial reports, multiple interviews with program managers of two TB REACH funded ACF programs deployed in Cambodia and Tajikistan, we first identified common program components, which formed the basis of the cost data collection, analysis, reporting framework. Within each program component and sub-activity group, cost data were collected and organized by relevant resource types (human resource, capital, recurrent, and overhead costs). Total shared, indirect and overhead costs were apportioned into each activity category based on direct human resource contribution (e.g. a number of staff and their relative level of effort dedicated to each program component). Capital assets were assessed specific to program components and were annualized based on their expected useful life and a 3% discount rate. All costs were assessed based on the service provider perspective and expressed in 2015 USD. RESULTS: Over the two program years (April 2013 to December 2015), the Cambodia and Tajikistan ACF programs cumulated a total cost of $336,951 and $771,429 to screen 68,846 and 1,980,516 target population, bacteriologically test 4,589 and 19,764 presumptive TB, diagnose 731 and 2,246 TB patients in the respective programs. Recurrent costs were the largest cost components (54% and 34%) of the total costs for the respective programs and Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) testing incurred largest program component/activity cost for both programs. Cost per screening was $0.63 and $0.10 and cost per Xpert test was $25 and $18; Cost per TB case detected (Xpert) was $373 and $343 in Cambodia and Tajikistan. CONCLUSIONS: Results from two contextually and programmatically different multi-component ACF programs demonstrate that our tool is fully capable of comprehensively and transparently evaluating and comparing costs of various ACF programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6984737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69847372020-02-07 Standardized framework for evaluating costs of active case-finding programs: An analysis of two programs in Cambodia and Tajikistan Jo, Youngji Mirzoeva, Farangiz Chry, Monyrath Qin, Zhi Zhen Codlin, Andrew Bobokhojaev, Oktam Creswell, Jacob Sohn, Hojoon PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Over the years, technological and process innovations enabled active case finding (ACF) programs to expand their capacities and scope to have evolved to close gaps in missing TB patients globally. However, with increased ACF program’s operational complexity and a need for significant resource commitments, a comprehensive, transparent, and standardized approach in evaluating costs of ACF programs is needed to properly determine costs and value of ACF programs. METHODS: Based on reviews of program activity and financial reports, multiple interviews with program managers of two TB REACH funded ACF programs deployed in Cambodia and Tajikistan, we first identified common program components, which formed the basis of the cost data collection, analysis, reporting framework. Within each program component and sub-activity group, cost data were collected and organized by relevant resource types (human resource, capital, recurrent, and overhead costs). Total shared, indirect and overhead costs were apportioned into each activity category based on direct human resource contribution (e.g. a number of staff and their relative level of effort dedicated to each program component). Capital assets were assessed specific to program components and were annualized based on their expected useful life and a 3% discount rate. All costs were assessed based on the service provider perspective and expressed in 2015 USD. RESULTS: Over the two program years (April 2013 to December 2015), the Cambodia and Tajikistan ACF programs cumulated a total cost of $336,951 and $771,429 to screen 68,846 and 1,980,516 target population, bacteriologically test 4,589 and 19,764 presumptive TB, diagnose 731 and 2,246 TB patients in the respective programs. Recurrent costs were the largest cost components (54% and 34%) of the total costs for the respective programs and Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) testing incurred largest program component/activity cost for both programs. Cost per screening was $0.63 and $0.10 and cost per Xpert test was $25 and $18; Cost per TB case detected (Xpert) was $373 and $343 in Cambodia and Tajikistan. CONCLUSIONS: Results from two contextually and programmatically different multi-component ACF programs demonstrate that our tool is fully capable of comprehensively and transparently evaluating and comparing costs of various ACF programs. Public Library of Science 2020-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6984737/ /pubmed/31986183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228216 Text en © 2020 Jo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jo, Youngji
Mirzoeva, Farangiz
Chry, Monyrath
Qin, Zhi Zhen
Codlin, Andrew
Bobokhojaev, Oktam
Creswell, Jacob
Sohn, Hojoon
Standardized framework for evaluating costs of active case-finding programs: An analysis of two programs in Cambodia and Tajikistan
title Standardized framework for evaluating costs of active case-finding programs: An analysis of two programs in Cambodia and Tajikistan
title_full Standardized framework for evaluating costs of active case-finding programs: An analysis of two programs in Cambodia and Tajikistan
title_fullStr Standardized framework for evaluating costs of active case-finding programs: An analysis of two programs in Cambodia and Tajikistan
title_full_unstemmed Standardized framework for evaluating costs of active case-finding programs: An analysis of two programs in Cambodia and Tajikistan
title_short Standardized framework for evaluating costs of active case-finding programs: An analysis of two programs in Cambodia and Tajikistan
title_sort standardized framework for evaluating costs of active case-finding programs: an analysis of two programs in cambodia and tajikistan
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6984737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31986183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228216
work_keys_str_mv AT joyoungji standardizedframeworkforevaluatingcostsofactivecasefindingprogramsananalysisoftwoprogramsincambodiaandtajikistan
AT mirzoevafarangiz standardizedframeworkforevaluatingcostsofactivecasefindingprogramsananalysisoftwoprogramsincambodiaandtajikistan
AT chrymonyrath standardizedframeworkforevaluatingcostsofactivecasefindingprogramsananalysisoftwoprogramsincambodiaandtajikistan
AT qinzhizhen standardizedframeworkforevaluatingcostsofactivecasefindingprogramsananalysisoftwoprogramsincambodiaandtajikistan
AT codlinandrew standardizedframeworkforevaluatingcostsofactivecasefindingprogramsananalysisoftwoprogramsincambodiaandtajikistan
AT bobokhojaevoktam standardizedframeworkforevaluatingcostsofactivecasefindingprogramsananalysisoftwoprogramsincambodiaandtajikistan
AT creswelljacob standardizedframeworkforevaluatingcostsofactivecasefindingprogramsananalysisoftwoprogramsincambodiaandtajikistan
AT sohnhojoon standardizedframeworkforevaluatingcostsofactivecasefindingprogramsananalysisoftwoprogramsincambodiaandtajikistan