Cargando…

A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following first­line induction chemotherapy in extensive­ stage small cell lung cancer

Background The 5-year survival rate for extensive-disease small-cell lung carcinoma (ED-SCLC) is only 1%. Recently, apatinib exerted promising effects on cancer patients after failure of first-line chemotherapy. Methods This study enrolled 24 ED-SCLC patients to study the efficacy and toxicity of ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Hao, Zhang, Liang, Yang, Bo, Feng, Yan, Xiong, Yanli, Zhang, Shiheng, Li, Xuemei, Qian, Chengyuan, Dong, Wang, Dai, Nan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6985106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31399906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10637-019-00828-x
_version_ 1783491750097059840
author Luo, Hao
Zhang, Liang
Yang, Bo
Feng, Yan
Xiong, Yanli
Zhang, Shiheng
Li, Xuemei
Qian, Chengyuan
Dong, Wang
Dai, Nan
author_facet Luo, Hao
Zhang, Liang
Yang, Bo
Feng, Yan
Xiong, Yanli
Zhang, Shiheng
Li, Xuemei
Qian, Chengyuan
Dong, Wang
Dai, Nan
author_sort Luo, Hao
collection PubMed
description Background The 5-year survival rate for extensive-disease small-cell lung carcinoma (ED-SCLC) is only 1%. Recently, apatinib exerted promising effects on cancer patients after failure of first-line chemotherapy. Methods This study enrolled 24 ED-SCLC patients to study the efficacy and toxicity of apatinib in combination with chemotherapy and maintenance therapy. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included toxicity and safety. Apatinib was given 250 mg/day during the chemotherapy interval, and as maintenance therapy after 4–6 cycles until the patient progressed, died, or was intolerant to drug toxicity. The study further evaluated the cytotoxicity, cell-cycle arrest and apoptotic induction of apatinib in A549 and H446 cells. Results There was no difference in short-term efficacy between combined and chemotherapy groups. Long-term efficacy showed that the median PFS was 7.8 months and 4.9 months in combination and chemotherapy groups, respectively [p = 0.002, HR(95%CI): 0.18(0.06–0.60)]. The median OS was 12.1 months and 8.2 months in combination and chemotherapy groups, respectively [p = 0.023, HR(95%CI): 0.38 (0.16–0.90)]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that apatinib combined with chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. The ECOG score was an independent prognostic factor affecting OS. In vitro analysis showed that apatinib inhibited cell proliferation and caused cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Conclusion Apatinib combination/maintenance therapy showed promising efficacy and safety to extend OS/PFS in ED-SCLC and will be a potent therapeutic option in future practice. Although the scale of this study is small, further research on large sample sizes is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10637-019-00828-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6985106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69851062020-02-07 A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following first­line induction chemotherapy in extensive­ stage small cell lung cancer Luo, Hao Zhang, Liang Yang, Bo Feng, Yan Xiong, Yanli Zhang, Shiheng Li, Xuemei Qian, Chengyuan Dong, Wang Dai, Nan Invest New Drugs Phase II Studies Background The 5-year survival rate for extensive-disease small-cell lung carcinoma (ED-SCLC) is only 1%. Recently, apatinib exerted promising effects on cancer patients after failure of first-line chemotherapy. Methods This study enrolled 24 ED-SCLC patients to study the efficacy and toxicity of apatinib in combination with chemotherapy and maintenance therapy. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included toxicity and safety. Apatinib was given 250 mg/day during the chemotherapy interval, and as maintenance therapy after 4–6 cycles until the patient progressed, died, or was intolerant to drug toxicity. The study further evaluated the cytotoxicity, cell-cycle arrest and apoptotic induction of apatinib in A549 and H446 cells. Results There was no difference in short-term efficacy between combined and chemotherapy groups. Long-term efficacy showed that the median PFS was 7.8 months and 4.9 months in combination and chemotherapy groups, respectively [p = 0.002, HR(95%CI): 0.18(0.06–0.60)]. The median OS was 12.1 months and 8.2 months in combination and chemotherapy groups, respectively [p = 0.023, HR(95%CI): 0.38 (0.16–0.90)]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that apatinib combined with chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. The ECOG score was an independent prognostic factor affecting OS. In vitro analysis showed that apatinib inhibited cell proliferation and caused cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Conclusion Apatinib combination/maintenance therapy showed promising efficacy and safety to extend OS/PFS in ED-SCLC and will be a potent therapeutic option in future practice. Although the scale of this study is small, further research on large sample sizes is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10637-019-00828-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-08-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6985106/ /pubmed/31399906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10637-019-00828-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Phase II Studies
Luo, Hao
Zhang, Liang
Yang, Bo
Feng, Yan
Xiong, Yanli
Zhang, Shiheng
Li, Xuemei
Qian, Chengyuan
Dong, Wang
Dai, Nan
A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following first­line induction chemotherapy in extensive­ stage small cell lung cancer
title A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following first­line induction chemotherapy in extensive­ stage small cell lung cancer
title_full A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following first­line induction chemotherapy in extensive­ stage small cell lung cancer
title_fullStr A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following first­line induction chemotherapy in extensive­ stage small cell lung cancer
title_full_unstemmed A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following first­line induction chemotherapy in extensive­ stage small cell lung cancer
title_short A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following first­line induction chemotherapy in extensive­ stage small cell lung cancer
title_sort randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following first­line induction chemotherapy in extensive­ stage small cell lung cancer
topic Phase II Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6985106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31399906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10637-019-00828-x
work_keys_str_mv AT luohao arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT zhangliang arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT yangbo arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT fengyan arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT xiongyanli arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT zhangshiheng arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT lixuemei arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT qianchengyuan arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT dongwang arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT dainan arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT luohao randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT zhangliang randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT yangbo randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT fengyan randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT xiongyanli randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT zhangshiheng randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT lixuemei randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT qianchengyuan randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT dongwang randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer
AT dainan randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer