Cargando…
A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following firstline induction chemotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer
Background The 5-year survival rate for extensive-disease small-cell lung carcinoma (ED-SCLC) is only 1%. Recently, apatinib exerted promising effects on cancer patients after failure of first-line chemotherapy. Methods This study enrolled 24 ED-SCLC patients to study the efficacy and toxicity of ap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6985106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31399906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10637-019-00828-x |
_version_ | 1783491750097059840 |
---|---|
author | Luo, Hao Zhang, Liang Yang, Bo Feng, Yan Xiong, Yanli Zhang, Shiheng Li, Xuemei Qian, Chengyuan Dong, Wang Dai, Nan |
author_facet | Luo, Hao Zhang, Liang Yang, Bo Feng, Yan Xiong, Yanli Zhang, Shiheng Li, Xuemei Qian, Chengyuan Dong, Wang Dai, Nan |
author_sort | Luo, Hao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background The 5-year survival rate for extensive-disease small-cell lung carcinoma (ED-SCLC) is only 1%. Recently, apatinib exerted promising effects on cancer patients after failure of first-line chemotherapy. Methods This study enrolled 24 ED-SCLC patients to study the efficacy and toxicity of apatinib in combination with chemotherapy and maintenance therapy. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included toxicity and safety. Apatinib was given 250 mg/day during the chemotherapy interval, and as maintenance therapy after 4–6 cycles until the patient progressed, died, or was intolerant to drug toxicity. The study further evaluated the cytotoxicity, cell-cycle arrest and apoptotic induction of apatinib in A549 and H446 cells. Results There was no difference in short-term efficacy between combined and chemotherapy groups. Long-term efficacy showed that the median PFS was 7.8 months and 4.9 months in combination and chemotherapy groups, respectively [p = 0.002, HR(95%CI): 0.18(0.06–0.60)]. The median OS was 12.1 months and 8.2 months in combination and chemotherapy groups, respectively [p = 0.023, HR(95%CI): 0.38 (0.16–0.90)]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that apatinib combined with chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. The ECOG score was an independent prognostic factor affecting OS. In vitro analysis showed that apatinib inhibited cell proliferation and caused cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Conclusion Apatinib combination/maintenance therapy showed promising efficacy and safety to extend OS/PFS in ED-SCLC and will be a potent therapeutic option in future practice. Although the scale of this study is small, further research on large sample sizes is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10637-019-00828-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6985106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69851062020-02-07 A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following firstline induction chemotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer Luo, Hao Zhang, Liang Yang, Bo Feng, Yan Xiong, Yanli Zhang, Shiheng Li, Xuemei Qian, Chengyuan Dong, Wang Dai, Nan Invest New Drugs Phase II Studies Background The 5-year survival rate for extensive-disease small-cell lung carcinoma (ED-SCLC) is only 1%. Recently, apatinib exerted promising effects on cancer patients after failure of first-line chemotherapy. Methods This study enrolled 24 ED-SCLC patients to study the efficacy and toxicity of apatinib in combination with chemotherapy and maintenance therapy. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included toxicity and safety. Apatinib was given 250 mg/day during the chemotherapy interval, and as maintenance therapy after 4–6 cycles until the patient progressed, died, or was intolerant to drug toxicity. The study further evaluated the cytotoxicity, cell-cycle arrest and apoptotic induction of apatinib in A549 and H446 cells. Results There was no difference in short-term efficacy between combined and chemotherapy groups. Long-term efficacy showed that the median PFS was 7.8 months and 4.9 months in combination and chemotherapy groups, respectively [p = 0.002, HR(95%CI): 0.18(0.06–0.60)]. The median OS was 12.1 months and 8.2 months in combination and chemotherapy groups, respectively [p = 0.023, HR(95%CI): 0.38 (0.16–0.90)]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that apatinib combined with chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. The ECOG score was an independent prognostic factor affecting OS. In vitro analysis showed that apatinib inhibited cell proliferation and caused cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis. Conclusion Apatinib combination/maintenance therapy showed promising efficacy and safety to extend OS/PFS in ED-SCLC and will be a potent therapeutic option in future practice. Although the scale of this study is small, further research on large sample sizes is needed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10637-019-00828-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-08-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6985106/ /pubmed/31399906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10637-019-00828-x Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Phase II Studies Luo, Hao Zhang, Liang Yang, Bo Feng, Yan Xiong, Yanli Zhang, Shiheng Li, Xuemei Qian, Chengyuan Dong, Wang Dai, Nan A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following firstline induction chemotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer |
title | A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following firstline induction chemotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer |
title_full | A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following firstline induction chemotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer |
title_fullStr | A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following firstline induction chemotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following firstline induction chemotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer |
title_short | A randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following firstline induction chemotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer |
title_sort | randomized phase 2 trial of apatinib vs observation as maintenance treatment following firstline induction chemotherapy in extensive stage small cell lung cancer |
topic | Phase II Studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6985106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31399906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10637-019-00828-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luohao arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT zhangliang arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT yangbo arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT fengyan arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT xiongyanli arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT zhangshiheng arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT lixuemei arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT qianchengyuan arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT dongwang arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT dainan arandomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT luohao randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT zhangliang randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT yangbo randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT fengyan randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT xiongyanli randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT zhangshiheng randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT lixuemei randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT qianchengyuan randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT dongwang randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer AT dainan randomizedphase2trialofapatinibvsobservationasmaintenancetreatmentfollowingfirstlineinductionchemotherapyinextensivestagesmallcelllungcancer |