Cargando…

Consolidative Chemoradiotherapy After Induced Chemotherapy Is an Optimal Regimen for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Object: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of consolidative chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) after induced chemotherapy (iCT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients and methods: Patients with LAPC were enrolled from January 2013 to November 2018. In stage one, all patients received i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Lili, Zhou, Yuhong, Fan, Yue, Rao, Shengxiang, Ji, Yuan, Sun, Jing, Li, Tingting, Du, Shisuo, Guo, Xi, Zeng, Zhaochong, Lou, Wenhui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6985361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01543
_version_ 1783491794909003776
author Wu, Lili
Zhou, Yuhong
Fan, Yue
Rao, Shengxiang
Ji, Yuan
Sun, Jing
Li, Tingting
Du, Shisuo
Guo, Xi
Zeng, Zhaochong
Lou, Wenhui
author_facet Wu, Lili
Zhou, Yuhong
Fan, Yue
Rao, Shengxiang
Ji, Yuan
Sun, Jing
Li, Tingting
Du, Shisuo
Guo, Xi
Zeng, Zhaochong
Lou, Wenhui
author_sort Wu, Lili
collection PubMed
description Object: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of consolidative chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) after induced chemotherapy (iCT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients and methods: Patients with LAPC were enrolled from January 2013 to November 2018. In stage one, all patients received iCT. Those without distant metastasis proceeded to stage two, received 50.4 Gy cCRT with S-1 as radiosensitizer. Efficacy and tolerability were evaluated in all patients. Results: Sixty-five patients enrolled into this study and accepted iCT. Eleven (16.9%) patients got early progressions or declined general condition, 1 (1.5%) patient quit the trial after one cycle of iCT. These 12 patients didn't receive cCRT. The remaining 53 (81.5%) patients received cCRT. After cCRT, 4 of 53 (7.5%) patients accepted radical resection. The treatment was well-tolerated. In stage one, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most frequent toxicities, the severe toxicity (grade 3 and 4) were 26.2 and 20.0%, respectively. In stage two, fatigue (45.3%) and nausea (41.5%) were the most frequent toxic effects but most were mild. The median overall survival (OS) of whole group was 18.1 months [95% CI, 15.11–21.03 months]. The OS of patients with early progression and patients accepted cCRT were 7.6 months [95% CI, 5.22–10.02 months] and 19.5 months [95% CI, 18.08–20.95 months], respectively (P < 0.001). The PFS of the 53 patients was 10.3 months [95% CI, 8.54–11.96 months] and survival rates at 1- and 2- years were 84.8 and 24.3%, respectively. Conclusion: The current results indicate that iCT is a useful screening method to selecting LAPC patients with less-aggressive biological behavior. cCRT after iCT in patients with LAPC is an optimal treatment. The prognosis of patients who received complete treatment is significantly improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6985361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69853612020-02-07 Consolidative Chemoradiotherapy After Induced Chemotherapy Is an Optimal Regimen for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Wu, Lili Zhou, Yuhong Fan, Yue Rao, Shengxiang Ji, Yuan Sun, Jing Li, Tingting Du, Shisuo Guo, Xi Zeng, Zhaochong Lou, Wenhui Front Oncol Oncology Object: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of consolidative chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) after induced chemotherapy (iCT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Patients and methods: Patients with LAPC were enrolled from January 2013 to November 2018. In stage one, all patients received iCT. Those without distant metastasis proceeded to stage two, received 50.4 Gy cCRT with S-1 as radiosensitizer. Efficacy and tolerability were evaluated in all patients. Results: Sixty-five patients enrolled into this study and accepted iCT. Eleven (16.9%) patients got early progressions or declined general condition, 1 (1.5%) patient quit the trial after one cycle of iCT. These 12 patients didn't receive cCRT. The remaining 53 (81.5%) patients received cCRT. After cCRT, 4 of 53 (7.5%) patients accepted radical resection. The treatment was well-tolerated. In stage one, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most frequent toxicities, the severe toxicity (grade 3 and 4) were 26.2 and 20.0%, respectively. In stage two, fatigue (45.3%) and nausea (41.5%) were the most frequent toxic effects but most were mild. The median overall survival (OS) of whole group was 18.1 months [95% CI, 15.11–21.03 months]. The OS of patients with early progression and patients accepted cCRT were 7.6 months [95% CI, 5.22–10.02 months] and 19.5 months [95% CI, 18.08–20.95 months], respectively (P < 0.001). The PFS of the 53 patients was 10.3 months [95% CI, 8.54–11.96 months] and survival rates at 1- and 2- years were 84.8 and 24.3%, respectively. Conclusion: The current results indicate that iCT is a useful screening method to selecting LAPC patients with less-aggressive biological behavior. cCRT after iCT in patients with LAPC is an optimal treatment. The prognosis of patients who received complete treatment is significantly improved. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6985361/ /pubmed/32039019 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01543 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wu, Zhou, Fan, Rao, Ji, Sun, Li, Du, Guo, Zeng and Lou. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wu, Lili
Zhou, Yuhong
Fan, Yue
Rao, Shengxiang
Ji, Yuan
Sun, Jing
Li, Tingting
Du, Shisuo
Guo, Xi
Zeng, Zhaochong
Lou, Wenhui
Consolidative Chemoradiotherapy After Induced Chemotherapy Is an Optimal Regimen for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
title Consolidative Chemoradiotherapy After Induced Chemotherapy Is an Optimal Regimen for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
title_full Consolidative Chemoradiotherapy After Induced Chemotherapy Is an Optimal Regimen for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
title_fullStr Consolidative Chemoradiotherapy After Induced Chemotherapy Is an Optimal Regimen for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Consolidative Chemoradiotherapy After Induced Chemotherapy Is an Optimal Regimen for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
title_short Consolidative Chemoradiotherapy After Induced Chemotherapy Is an Optimal Regimen for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
title_sort consolidative chemoradiotherapy after induced chemotherapy is an optimal regimen for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6985361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039019
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01543
work_keys_str_mv AT wulili consolidativechemoradiotherapyafterinducedchemotherapyisanoptimalregimenforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT zhouyuhong consolidativechemoradiotherapyafterinducedchemotherapyisanoptimalregimenforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT fanyue consolidativechemoradiotherapyafterinducedchemotherapyisanoptimalregimenforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT raoshengxiang consolidativechemoradiotherapyafterinducedchemotherapyisanoptimalregimenforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT jiyuan consolidativechemoradiotherapyafterinducedchemotherapyisanoptimalregimenforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT sunjing consolidativechemoradiotherapyafterinducedchemotherapyisanoptimalregimenforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT litingting consolidativechemoradiotherapyafterinducedchemotherapyisanoptimalregimenforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT dushisuo consolidativechemoradiotherapyafterinducedchemotherapyisanoptimalregimenforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT guoxi consolidativechemoradiotherapyafterinducedchemotherapyisanoptimalregimenforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT zengzhaochong consolidativechemoradiotherapyafterinducedchemotherapyisanoptimalregimenforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer
AT louwenhui consolidativechemoradiotherapyafterinducedchemotherapyisanoptimalregimenforlocallyadvancedpancreaticcancer