Cargando…
Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient
Compared to many other forms of social bias, weight bias is pervasive, socially accepted, and difficult to attenuate. According to the common ingroup identity model, strategies that expand group inclusiveness may promote more positive intergroup attitudes and behaviors, particularly when people are...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6985568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32038393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03020 |
_version_ | 1783491830662299648 |
---|---|
author | Brochu, Paula M. Banfield, Jillian C. Dovidio, John F. |
author_facet | Brochu, Paula M. Banfield, Jillian C. Dovidio, John F. |
author_sort | Brochu, Paula M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Compared to many other forms of social bias, weight bias is pervasive, socially accepted, and difficult to attenuate. According to the common ingroup identity model, strategies that expand group inclusiveness may promote more positive intergroup attitudes and behaviors, particularly when people are aware of unjust treatment of others included within their shared identity. Considering that most people are not aware of the social justice issue of weight discrimination, we hypothesized that a common ingroup identity would be effective in reducing weight bias primarily when unfair weight-based treatment was made salient (i.e., that fat people experience discrimination in employment). Participants were randomly assigned to conditions following a 3 (discrimination salience: weight discrimination, height discrimination, control) × 2 (group identity: common ingroup, control) design and completed an evaluative measure of weight bias. Results revealed a significant interaction, showing that when weight discrimination was salient, participants in the common ingroup identity condition reported less weight bias than participants in the group identity control condition. When a common ingroup identity was emphasized, weight bias was lower when weight discrimination was salient compared to when height discrimination was salient and the control condition in which nothing about discrimination was mentioned. These results were not moderated by participant weight. This study demonstrates that a common ingroup identity can be effective in reducing weight bias if a cue is provided that fat people experience disparate and unjust outcomes in employment. Given the serious consequences of weight bias for health and well-being, and the relative ease of implementing this prejudice-reduction intervention, the common ingroup identity model has potential application for reducing weight bias in a range of real-world settings. However, these findings should be considered preliminary until they are replicated in well-powered and pre-registered future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6985568 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69855682020-02-07 Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient Brochu, Paula M. Banfield, Jillian C. Dovidio, John F. Front Psychol Psychology Compared to many other forms of social bias, weight bias is pervasive, socially accepted, and difficult to attenuate. According to the common ingroup identity model, strategies that expand group inclusiveness may promote more positive intergroup attitudes and behaviors, particularly when people are aware of unjust treatment of others included within their shared identity. Considering that most people are not aware of the social justice issue of weight discrimination, we hypothesized that a common ingroup identity would be effective in reducing weight bias primarily when unfair weight-based treatment was made salient (i.e., that fat people experience discrimination in employment). Participants were randomly assigned to conditions following a 3 (discrimination salience: weight discrimination, height discrimination, control) × 2 (group identity: common ingroup, control) design and completed an evaluative measure of weight bias. Results revealed a significant interaction, showing that when weight discrimination was salient, participants in the common ingroup identity condition reported less weight bias than participants in the group identity control condition. When a common ingroup identity was emphasized, weight bias was lower when weight discrimination was salient compared to when height discrimination was salient and the control condition in which nothing about discrimination was mentioned. These results were not moderated by participant weight. This study demonstrates that a common ingroup identity can be effective in reducing weight bias if a cue is provided that fat people experience disparate and unjust outcomes in employment. Given the serious consequences of weight bias for health and well-being, and the relative ease of implementing this prejudice-reduction intervention, the common ingroup identity model has potential application for reducing weight bias in a range of real-world settings. However, these findings should be considered preliminary until they are replicated in well-powered and pre-registered future research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6985568/ /pubmed/32038393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03020 Text en Copyright © 2020 Brochu, Banfield and Dovidio. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Brochu, Paula M. Banfield, Jillian C. Dovidio, John F. Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient |
title | Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient |
title_full | Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient |
title_fullStr | Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient |
title_full_unstemmed | Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient |
title_short | Does a Common Ingroup Identity Reduce Weight Bias? Only When Weight Discrimination Is Salient |
title_sort | does a common ingroup identity reduce weight bias? only when weight discrimination is salient |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6985568/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32038393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brochupaulam doesacommoningroupidentityreduceweightbiasonlywhenweightdiscriminationissalient AT banfieldjillianc doesacommoningroupidentityreduceweightbiasonlywhenweightdiscriminationissalient AT dovidiojohnf doesacommoningroupidentityreduceweightbiasonlywhenweightdiscriminationissalient |