Cargando…
Machine learning in multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging can replace conventional laser Doppler flowmetry
Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) enables video rate imaging of blood flow. However, its relation to tissue blood perfusion is nonlinear and depends strongly on exposure time. By contrast, the perfusion estimate from the slower laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) technique has a relationship to blood...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6985684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30675771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.1.016001 |
_version_ | 1783491857036083200 |
---|---|
author | Fredriksson, Ingemar Hultman, Martin Strömberg, Tomas Larsson, Marcus |
author_facet | Fredriksson, Ingemar Hultman, Martin Strömberg, Tomas Larsson, Marcus |
author_sort | Fredriksson, Ingemar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) enables video rate imaging of blood flow. However, its relation to tissue blood perfusion is nonlinear and depends strongly on exposure time. By contrast, the perfusion estimate from the slower laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) technique has a relationship to blood perfusion that is better understood. Multiexposure LSCI (MELSCI) enables a perfusion estimate closer to the actual perfusion than that using a single exposure time. We present and evaluate a method that utilizes contrasts from seven exposure times between 1 and 64 ms to calculate a perfusion estimate that resembles the perfusion estimate from LDF. The method is based on artificial neural networks (ANN) for fast and accurate processing of MELSCI contrasts to perfusion. The networks are trained using modeling of Doppler histograms and speckle contrasts from tissue models. The importance of accounting for noise is demonstrated. Results show that by using ANN, MELSCI data can be processed to LDF perfusion with high accuracy, with a correlation coefficient [Formula: see text] for noise-free data, [Formula: see text] when a moderate degree of noise is present, and [Formula: see text] for in vivo data from an occlusion-release experiment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6985684 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69856842020-02-03 Machine learning in multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging can replace conventional laser Doppler flowmetry Fredriksson, Ingemar Hultman, Martin Strömberg, Tomas Larsson, Marcus J Biomed Opt Imaging Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) enables video rate imaging of blood flow. However, its relation to tissue blood perfusion is nonlinear and depends strongly on exposure time. By contrast, the perfusion estimate from the slower laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) technique has a relationship to blood perfusion that is better understood. Multiexposure LSCI (MELSCI) enables a perfusion estimate closer to the actual perfusion than that using a single exposure time. We present and evaluate a method that utilizes contrasts from seven exposure times between 1 and 64 ms to calculate a perfusion estimate that resembles the perfusion estimate from LDF. The method is based on artificial neural networks (ANN) for fast and accurate processing of MELSCI contrasts to perfusion. The networks are trained using modeling of Doppler histograms and speckle contrasts from tissue models. The importance of accounting for noise is demonstrated. Results show that by using ANN, MELSCI data can be processed to LDF perfusion with high accuracy, with a correlation coefficient [Formula: see text] for noise-free data, [Formula: see text] when a moderate degree of noise is present, and [Formula: see text] for in vivo data from an occlusion-release experiment. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2019-01-23 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6985684/ /pubmed/30675771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.1.016001 Text en © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI. |
spellingShingle | Imaging Fredriksson, Ingemar Hultman, Martin Strömberg, Tomas Larsson, Marcus Machine learning in multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging can replace conventional laser Doppler flowmetry |
title | Machine learning in multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging can replace conventional laser Doppler flowmetry |
title_full | Machine learning in multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging can replace conventional laser Doppler flowmetry |
title_fullStr | Machine learning in multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging can replace conventional laser Doppler flowmetry |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning in multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging can replace conventional laser Doppler flowmetry |
title_short | Machine learning in multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging can replace conventional laser Doppler flowmetry |
title_sort | machine learning in multiexposure laser speckle contrast imaging can replace conventional laser doppler flowmetry |
topic | Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6985684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30675771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.1.016001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fredrikssoningemar machinelearninginmultiexposurelaserspecklecontrastimagingcanreplaceconventionallaserdopplerflowmetry AT hultmanmartin machinelearninginmultiexposurelaserspecklecontrastimagingcanreplaceconventionallaserdopplerflowmetry AT strombergtomas machinelearninginmultiexposurelaserspecklecontrastimagingcanreplaceconventionallaserdopplerflowmetry AT larssonmarcus machinelearninginmultiexposurelaserspecklecontrastimagingcanreplaceconventionallaserdopplerflowmetry |