Cargando…

Introduction of Interactive Teaching for Undergraduate Students in Community Medicine

BACKGROUND: There is lack of interest in the subject of community medicine among undergraduate MBBS students leading to poor understanding of community problems and drastic fall in preventive, promotive component of health care. AIM: To evaluate effectiveness of interactive teaching learning (ITL) o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Begum, Jarina, Ali, Syed Irfan, Panda, Manasee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6985943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32029988
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_232_19
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There is lack of interest in the subject of community medicine among undergraduate MBBS students leading to poor understanding of community problems and drastic fall in preventive, promotive component of health care. AIM: To evaluate effectiveness of interactive teaching learning (ITL) over traditional teaching learning (TTL) methods in creating interest in the subject. OBJECTIVES: 1. To identify the need of interactive teaching among students. 2. To know the perception of students towards it.3. To know the views and opinion of faculties towards it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An interventional study at NRIIMS, Vishakhapatnam. After need assessment survey, under graduate MBBS students were randomly allocated to study (A) and control groups (B). 2 topics were taught using ITL 1& 2 in group A and TTL in group B. After a washout period of 15 days, 2 other topics were taught using ITL3 & 4 in group B and TTL in group A, which was followed by assessment. Feedback from students and faculties were taken at the end of session. RESULTS: 82% of students felt significant need of interaction in classroom. There was an increase in performance of students in the intervention group in terms of better scores (>75% score) which was found to be statistical significant in all the four sessions (P value are 0.0230, 0.0058, 0.0075, 0.0034 for TPS, BS, CBS, PTP respectively). Students were satisfied, so as the faculties with the implementation of ITL module. CONCLUSIONS: Student performance was increased. Overall satisfaction was good among students and faculties.