Cargando…

Evaluating opportunities for improved orthopedics outpatient satisfaction: an analysis of Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey responses

INTRODUCTION: The Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey (PGOMPS) is composed of 10 provider-specific and 15 non-provider-specific questions. Some healthcare systems link PGOMS overall scores to physician reimbursements. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of patient satisf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stephens, Andrew R., Rowberry, Tyson J., Tyser, Andrew R., Kazmers, Nikolas H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6986136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31992339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-1567-1
_version_ 1783491924430159872
author Stephens, Andrew R.
Rowberry, Tyson J.
Tyser, Andrew R.
Kazmers, Nikolas H.
author_facet Stephens, Andrew R.
Rowberry, Tyson J.
Tyser, Andrew R.
Kazmers, Nikolas H.
author_sort Stephens, Andrew R.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey (PGOMPS) is composed of 10 provider-specific and 15 non-provider-specific questions. Some healthcare systems link PGOMS overall scores to physician reimbursements. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of patient satisfaction across individual PGOMPS question, the null hypothesis being that there was no variability between the frequency of satisfaction and similar questions. METHODS: We reviewed all new patient orthopedic PGOMPS scores between January 2014 and December 2017. Due to the large ceiling effect, satisfaction was defined as a perfect total score. The frequency of perfect scores for each question was calculated. RESULTS: Five thousand one hundred sixty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. Two thousand two hundred sixty-six (43.89%) provider-specific questions received perfect satisfaction versus 986 (19.10%) with perfect satisfaction for non-provider-specific questions (p <  0.001). The five questions most likely to receive perfect satisfaction were MD friendliness/courtesy (80.36), MD spoke using clear language (80.35%), likelihood to recommend practice (79.11%), likelihood to recommend MD (78.8%), and MD confidence (78.74%). The five least likely were convenience of office hours (60.44%), ease of getting on phone (59.72%), ability to get desired appointment (59.50%), wait time (54.63%), and information about delays (53.80%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the majority of orthopedic patients are satisfied with their provider, demonstrating that room for improvement is limited with provider-specific areas. Leaders of health care teams should consider these results when seeking to improve patient satisfaction scores and determining how and if scores should be linked to reimbursements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6986136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69861362020-01-30 Evaluating opportunities for improved orthopedics outpatient satisfaction: an analysis of Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey responses Stephens, Andrew R. Rowberry, Tyson J. Tyser, Andrew R. Kazmers, Nikolas H. J Orthop Surg Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: The Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey (PGOMPS) is composed of 10 provider-specific and 15 non-provider-specific questions. Some healthcare systems link PGOMS overall scores to physician reimbursements. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of patient satisfaction across individual PGOMPS question, the null hypothesis being that there was no variability between the frequency of satisfaction and similar questions. METHODS: We reviewed all new patient orthopedic PGOMPS scores between January 2014 and December 2017. Due to the large ceiling effect, satisfaction was defined as a perfect total score. The frequency of perfect scores for each question was calculated. RESULTS: Five thousand one hundred sixty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. Two thousand two hundred sixty-six (43.89%) provider-specific questions received perfect satisfaction versus 986 (19.10%) with perfect satisfaction for non-provider-specific questions (p <  0.001). The five questions most likely to receive perfect satisfaction were MD friendliness/courtesy (80.36), MD spoke using clear language (80.35%), likelihood to recommend practice (79.11%), likelihood to recommend MD (78.8%), and MD confidence (78.74%). The five least likely were convenience of office hours (60.44%), ease of getting on phone (59.72%), ability to get desired appointment (59.50%), wait time (54.63%), and information about delays (53.80%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the majority of orthopedic patients are satisfied with their provider, demonstrating that room for improvement is limited with provider-specific areas. Leaders of health care teams should consider these results when seeking to improve patient satisfaction scores and determining how and if scores should be linked to reimbursements. BioMed Central 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6986136/ /pubmed/31992339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-1567-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stephens, Andrew R.
Rowberry, Tyson J.
Tyser, Andrew R.
Kazmers, Nikolas H.
Evaluating opportunities for improved orthopedics outpatient satisfaction: an analysis of Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey responses
title Evaluating opportunities for improved orthopedics outpatient satisfaction: an analysis of Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey responses
title_full Evaluating opportunities for improved orthopedics outpatient satisfaction: an analysis of Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey responses
title_fullStr Evaluating opportunities for improved orthopedics outpatient satisfaction: an analysis of Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey responses
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating opportunities for improved orthopedics outpatient satisfaction: an analysis of Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey responses
title_short Evaluating opportunities for improved orthopedics outpatient satisfaction: an analysis of Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey responses
title_sort evaluating opportunities for improved orthopedics outpatient satisfaction: an analysis of press ganey® outpatient medical practice survey responses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6986136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31992339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-1567-1
work_keys_str_mv AT stephensandrewr evaluatingopportunitiesforimprovedorthopedicsoutpatientsatisfactionananalysisofpressganeyoutpatientmedicalpracticesurveyresponses
AT rowberrytysonj evaluatingopportunitiesforimprovedorthopedicsoutpatientsatisfactionananalysisofpressganeyoutpatientmedicalpracticesurveyresponses
AT tyserandrewr evaluatingopportunitiesforimprovedorthopedicsoutpatientsatisfactionananalysisofpressganeyoutpatientmedicalpracticesurveyresponses
AT kazmersnikolash evaluatingopportunitiesforimprovedorthopedicsoutpatientsatisfactionananalysisofpressganeyoutpatientmedicalpracticesurveyresponses