Cargando…
Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working?
Antimicrobial resistance is of increasing global concern. To incentivize the creation of new treatments, the US Congress enacted the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act (GAIN Act) of 2012, which provides benefits to manufacturers of Qualified Infectious Disease Products (QIDPs) including 5 year...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6986775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32016125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa001 |
_version_ | 1783492024154980352 |
---|---|
author | Darrow, Jonathan J Kesselheim, Aaron S |
author_facet | Darrow, Jonathan J Kesselheim, Aaron S |
author_sort | Darrow, Jonathan J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Antimicrobial resistance is of increasing global concern. To incentivize the creation of new treatments, the US Congress enacted the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act (GAIN Act) of 2012, which provides benefits to manufacturers of Qualified Infectious Disease Products (QIDPs) including 5 years of additional nonpatent exclusivity. The results of this program have so far been disappointing, largely because QIDP eligibility criteria were not sufficiently targeted to unmet need. The time value of money also means that QIDP exclusivity disproportionately rewards modifications to existing drugs rather than the creation of new drugs. To improve the outlook, GAIN Act criteria should be limited to a more narrowly tailored list of qualifying pathogens to ensure that QIDPs offer clinical value not available from existing treatments. Additional options for improvement include greater reliance on animal data when determining QIDP eligibility and conditioning GAIN Act benefits on the availability of companion diagnostics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6986775 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69867752020-02-03 Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working? Darrow, Jonathan J Kesselheim, Aaron S Open Forum Infect Dis Perspectives Antimicrobial resistance is of increasing global concern. To incentivize the creation of new treatments, the US Congress enacted the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act (GAIN Act) of 2012, which provides benefits to manufacturers of Qualified Infectious Disease Products (QIDPs) including 5 years of additional nonpatent exclusivity. The results of this program have so far been disappointing, largely because QIDP eligibility criteria were not sufficiently targeted to unmet need. The time value of money also means that QIDP exclusivity disproportionately rewards modifications to existing drugs rather than the creation of new drugs. To improve the outlook, GAIN Act criteria should be limited to a more narrowly tailored list of qualifying pathogens to ensure that QIDPs offer clinical value not available from existing treatments. Additional options for improvement include greater reliance on animal data when determining QIDP eligibility and conditioning GAIN Act benefits on the availability of companion diagnostics. Oxford University Press 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6986775/ /pubmed/32016125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa001 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Perspectives Darrow, Jonathan J Kesselheim, Aaron S Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working? |
title | Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working? |
title_full | Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working? |
title_fullStr | Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working? |
title_full_unstemmed | Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working? |
title_short | Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working? |
title_sort | incentivizing antibiotic development: why isn’t the generating antibiotic incentives now (gain) act working? |
topic | Perspectives |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6986775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32016125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT darrowjonathanj incentivizingantibioticdevelopmentwhyisntthegeneratingantibioticincentivesnowgainactworking AT kesselheimaarons incentivizingantibioticdevelopmentwhyisntthegeneratingantibioticincentivesnowgainactworking |