Cargando…

Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working?

Antimicrobial resistance is of increasing global concern. To incentivize the creation of new treatments, the US Congress enacted the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act (GAIN Act) of 2012, which provides benefits to manufacturers of Qualified Infectious Disease Products (QIDPs) including 5 year...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Darrow, Jonathan J, Kesselheim, Aaron S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6986775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32016125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa001
_version_ 1783492024154980352
author Darrow, Jonathan J
Kesselheim, Aaron S
author_facet Darrow, Jonathan J
Kesselheim, Aaron S
author_sort Darrow, Jonathan J
collection PubMed
description Antimicrobial resistance is of increasing global concern. To incentivize the creation of new treatments, the US Congress enacted the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act (GAIN Act) of 2012, which provides benefits to manufacturers of Qualified Infectious Disease Products (QIDPs) including 5 years of additional nonpatent exclusivity. The results of this program have so far been disappointing, largely because QIDP eligibility criteria were not sufficiently targeted to unmet need. The time value of money also means that QIDP exclusivity disproportionately rewards modifications to existing drugs rather than the creation of new drugs. To improve the outlook, GAIN Act criteria should be limited to a more narrowly tailored list of qualifying pathogens to ensure that QIDPs offer clinical value not available from existing treatments. Additional options for improvement include greater reliance on animal data when determining QIDP eligibility and conditioning GAIN Act benefits on the availability of companion diagnostics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6986775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69867752020-02-03 Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working? Darrow, Jonathan J Kesselheim, Aaron S Open Forum Infect Dis Perspectives Antimicrobial resistance is of increasing global concern. To incentivize the creation of new treatments, the US Congress enacted the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now Act (GAIN Act) of 2012, which provides benefits to manufacturers of Qualified Infectious Disease Products (QIDPs) including 5 years of additional nonpatent exclusivity. The results of this program have so far been disappointing, largely because QIDP eligibility criteria were not sufficiently targeted to unmet need. The time value of money also means that QIDP exclusivity disproportionately rewards modifications to existing drugs rather than the creation of new drugs. To improve the outlook, GAIN Act criteria should be limited to a more narrowly tailored list of qualifying pathogens to ensure that QIDPs offer clinical value not available from existing treatments. Additional options for improvement include greater reliance on animal data when determining QIDP eligibility and conditioning GAIN Act benefits on the availability of companion diagnostics. Oxford University Press 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6986775/ /pubmed/32016125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa001 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Perspectives
Darrow, Jonathan J
Kesselheim, Aaron S
Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working?
title Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working?
title_full Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working?
title_fullStr Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working?
title_full_unstemmed Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working?
title_short Incentivizing Antibiotic Development: Why Isn’t the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (GAIN) Act Working?
title_sort incentivizing antibiotic development: why isn’t the generating antibiotic incentives now (gain) act working?
topic Perspectives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6986775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32016125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa001
work_keys_str_mv AT darrowjonathanj incentivizingantibioticdevelopmentwhyisntthegeneratingantibioticincentivesnowgainactworking
AT kesselheimaarons incentivizingantibioticdevelopmentwhyisntthegeneratingantibioticincentivesnowgainactworking