Cargando…

Prostate volume measurement by multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound: comparison with surgical specimen weight

OBJECTIVE: To assess accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance of the prostate to estimate gland volume, comparing the results with transrectal ultrasound and surgical specimen. METHODS: A retrospective study of 85 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultras...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martins, Tatiana, Mussi, Thais Caldara, Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6986883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32022105
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO4662
_version_ 1783492042063609856
author Martins, Tatiana
Mussi, Thais Caldara
Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
author_facet Martins, Tatiana
Mussi, Thais Caldara
Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
author_sort Martins, Tatiana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance of the prostate to estimate gland volume, comparing the results with transrectal ultrasound and surgical specimen. METHODS: A retrospective study of 85 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound (for fusion image-guided biopsy) before radical prostatectomy. Prostate measurements were obtained from magnetic resonance axial and sagittal T2-weighted images and ultrasound; the prostate volume was determined using the ellipsoid formula. The results were compared with the surgical specimen weight. Maximum interval between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, transrectal ultrasound, and prostatectomy was 6 months. RESULTS: The prostate volume measured by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was 18-157cm(3) (mean of 49.9cm(3)) and by transrectal ultrasound, 22-165cm(3) (mean of 54.9cm(3)); the surgical specimen weight was 20-154g (mean of 48.6g), with no statistical differences. Based on the values obtained from imaging examinations, the prostate volume obtained was very close to the real prostatic weight, and the measures by multiparametric magnetic resonance were slightly more precise. CONCLUSION: Prostate volume measured by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound showed similar values, and excellent agreement with real prostate weight of the surgical specimens. Prostate volume measured by magnetic resonance has been increasingly used in the clinical practice, and its value enables appropriate therapeutic planning and control of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6986883
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69868832020-02-10 Prostate volume measurement by multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound: comparison with surgical specimen weight Martins, Tatiana Mussi, Thais Caldara Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To assess accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance of the prostate to estimate gland volume, comparing the results with transrectal ultrasound and surgical specimen. METHODS: A retrospective study of 85 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound (for fusion image-guided biopsy) before radical prostatectomy. Prostate measurements were obtained from magnetic resonance axial and sagittal T2-weighted images and ultrasound; the prostate volume was determined using the ellipsoid formula. The results were compared with the surgical specimen weight. Maximum interval between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, transrectal ultrasound, and prostatectomy was 6 months. RESULTS: The prostate volume measured by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was 18-157cm(3) (mean of 49.9cm(3)) and by transrectal ultrasound, 22-165cm(3) (mean of 54.9cm(3)); the surgical specimen weight was 20-154g (mean of 48.6g), with no statistical differences. Based on the values obtained from imaging examinations, the prostate volume obtained was very close to the real prostatic weight, and the measures by multiparametric magnetic resonance were slightly more precise. CONCLUSION: Prostate volume measured by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound showed similar values, and excellent agreement with real prostate weight of the surgical specimens. Prostate volume measured by magnetic resonance has been increasingly used in the clinical practice, and its value enables appropriate therapeutic planning and control of patients. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2020-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6986883/ /pubmed/32022105 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO4662 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Martins, Tatiana
Mussi, Thais Caldara
Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
Prostate volume measurement by multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound: comparison with surgical specimen weight
title Prostate volume measurement by multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound: comparison with surgical specimen weight
title_full Prostate volume measurement by multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound: comparison with surgical specimen weight
title_fullStr Prostate volume measurement by multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound: comparison with surgical specimen weight
title_full_unstemmed Prostate volume measurement by multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound: comparison with surgical specimen weight
title_short Prostate volume measurement by multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound: comparison with surgical specimen weight
title_sort prostate volume measurement by multiparametric magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound: comparison with surgical specimen weight
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6986883/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32022105
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO4662
work_keys_str_mv AT martinstatiana prostatevolumemeasurementbymultiparametricmagneticresonanceandtransrectalultrasoundcomparisonwithsurgicalspecimenweight
AT mussithaiscaldara prostatevolumemeasurementbymultiparametricmagneticresonanceandtransrectalultrasoundcomparisonwithsurgicalspecimenweight
AT baronironaldohueb prostatevolumemeasurementbymultiparametricmagneticresonanceandtransrectalultrasoundcomparisonwithsurgicalspecimenweight