Cargando…
Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study
Irrelevant sounds can be very distracting, especially when trying to recall information according to its serial order. The irrelevant sound effect (ISE) has been studied in the literature for more than 40 years, yet many questions remain. One goal that has received little attention involves the disc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00968-8 |
_version_ | 1783492083630211072 |
---|---|
author | Elliott, Emily M. Marsh, John E. Zeringue, Jenna McGill, Corey I. |
author_facet | Elliott, Emily M. Marsh, John E. Zeringue, Jenna McGill, Corey I. |
author_sort | Elliott, Emily M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Irrelevant sounds can be very distracting, especially when trying to recall information according to its serial order. The irrelevant sound effect (ISE) has been studied in the literature for more than 40 years, yet many questions remain. One goal that has received little attention involves the discernment of a predictive factor, or individual difference characteristic, that would help to determine the size of the ISE. The current experiments were designed to replicate and extend prior work by Macken, Phelps, and Jones (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139–144, 2009), who demonstrated a significant predictive relationship between the size of the ISE and a type of auditory processing called global pattern matching. The authors also found a relationship between auditory processing involving deliberate recoding of sounds and serial order recall performance in silence. Across two experiments, this dissociation was not replicated. Additionally, the two types of auditory processing were not significantly correlated with each other. The lack of a clear pattern of findings replicating the Macken et al. (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139–144, 2009) study raises several questions regarding the need for future research on the characteristics of these auditory processing tasks, and the stability of the measurement of the ISE itself. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6987135 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69871352020-02-11 Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study Elliott, Emily M. Marsh, John E. Zeringue, Jenna McGill, Corey I. Mem Cognit Article Irrelevant sounds can be very distracting, especially when trying to recall information according to its serial order. The irrelevant sound effect (ISE) has been studied in the literature for more than 40 years, yet many questions remain. One goal that has received little attention involves the discernment of a predictive factor, or individual difference characteristic, that would help to determine the size of the ISE. The current experiments were designed to replicate and extend prior work by Macken, Phelps, and Jones (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139–144, 2009), who demonstrated a significant predictive relationship between the size of the ISE and a type of auditory processing called global pattern matching. The authors also found a relationship between auditory processing involving deliberate recoding of sounds and serial order recall performance in silence. Across two experiments, this dissociation was not replicated. Additionally, the two types of auditory processing were not significantly correlated with each other. The lack of a clear pattern of findings replicating the Macken et al. (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139–144, 2009) study raises several questions regarding the need for future research on the characteristics of these auditory processing tasks, and the stability of the measurement of the ISE itself. Springer US 2019-07-30 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6987135/ /pubmed/31363999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00968-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Elliott, Emily M. Marsh, John E. Zeringue, Jenna McGill, Corey I. Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study |
title | Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study |
title_full | Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study |
title_fullStr | Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study |
title_full_unstemmed | Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study |
title_short | Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study |
title_sort | are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? a replication study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00968-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elliottemilym areindividualdifferencesinauditoryprocessingrelatedtoauditorydistractionbyirrelevantsoundareplicationstudy AT marshjohne areindividualdifferencesinauditoryprocessingrelatedtoauditorydistractionbyirrelevantsoundareplicationstudy AT zeringuejenna areindividualdifferencesinauditoryprocessingrelatedtoauditorydistractionbyirrelevantsoundareplicationstudy AT mcgillcoreyi areindividualdifferencesinauditoryprocessingrelatedtoauditorydistractionbyirrelevantsoundareplicationstudy |