Cargando…

Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study

Irrelevant sounds can be very distracting, especially when trying to recall information according to its serial order. The irrelevant sound effect (ISE) has been studied in the literature for more than 40 years, yet many questions remain. One goal that has received little attention involves the disc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elliott, Emily M., Marsh, John E., Zeringue, Jenna, McGill, Corey I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00968-8
_version_ 1783492083630211072
author Elliott, Emily M.
Marsh, John E.
Zeringue, Jenna
McGill, Corey I.
author_facet Elliott, Emily M.
Marsh, John E.
Zeringue, Jenna
McGill, Corey I.
author_sort Elliott, Emily M.
collection PubMed
description Irrelevant sounds can be very distracting, especially when trying to recall information according to its serial order. The irrelevant sound effect (ISE) has been studied in the literature for more than 40 years, yet many questions remain. One goal that has received little attention involves the discernment of a predictive factor, or individual difference characteristic, that would help to determine the size of the ISE. The current experiments were designed to replicate and extend prior work by Macken, Phelps, and Jones (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139–144, 2009), who demonstrated a significant predictive relationship between the size of the ISE and a type of auditory processing called global pattern matching. The authors also found a relationship between auditory processing involving deliberate recoding of sounds and serial order recall performance in silence. Across two experiments, this dissociation was not replicated. Additionally, the two types of auditory processing were not significantly correlated with each other. The lack of a clear pattern of findings replicating the Macken et al. (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139–144, 2009) study raises several questions regarding the need for future research on the characteristics of these auditory processing tasks, and the stability of the measurement of the ISE itself.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6987135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69871352020-02-11 Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study Elliott, Emily M. Marsh, John E. Zeringue, Jenna McGill, Corey I. Mem Cognit Article Irrelevant sounds can be very distracting, especially when trying to recall information according to its serial order. The irrelevant sound effect (ISE) has been studied in the literature for more than 40 years, yet many questions remain. One goal that has received little attention involves the discernment of a predictive factor, or individual difference characteristic, that would help to determine the size of the ISE. The current experiments were designed to replicate and extend prior work by Macken, Phelps, and Jones (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139–144, 2009), who demonstrated a significant predictive relationship between the size of the ISE and a type of auditory processing called global pattern matching. The authors also found a relationship between auditory processing involving deliberate recoding of sounds and serial order recall performance in silence. Across two experiments, this dissociation was not replicated. Additionally, the two types of auditory processing were not significantly correlated with each other. The lack of a clear pattern of findings replicating the Macken et al. (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 139–144, 2009) study raises several questions regarding the need for future research on the characteristics of these auditory processing tasks, and the stability of the measurement of the ISE itself. Springer US 2019-07-30 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6987135/ /pubmed/31363999 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00968-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Elliott, Emily M.
Marsh, John E.
Zeringue, Jenna
McGill, Corey I.
Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study
title Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study
title_full Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study
title_fullStr Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study
title_full_unstemmed Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study
title_short Are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? A replication study
title_sort are individual differences in auditory processing related to auditory distraction by irrelevant sound? a replication study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31363999
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00968-8
work_keys_str_mv AT elliottemilym areindividualdifferencesinauditoryprocessingrelatedtoauditorydistractionbyirrelevantsoundareplicationstudy
AT marshjohne areindividualdifferencesinauditoryprocessingrelatedtoauditorydistractionbyirrelevantsoundareplicationstudy
AT zeringuejenna areindividualdifferencesinauditoryprocessingrelatedtoauditorydistractionbyirrelevantsoundareplicationstudy
AT mcgillcoreyi areindividualdifferencesinauditoryprocessingrelatedtoauditorydistractionbyirrelevantsoundareplicationstudy