Cargando…

The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56

This study aimed to genetically and clinically characterize a unique cohort of 25 individuals from 21 unrelated families with autosomal recessive nanophthalmos (NNO) and posterior microphthalmia (MCOP) from different ethnicities. An ophthalmological assessment in all families was followed by targete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almoallem, Basamat, Arno, Gavin, De Zaeytijd, Julie, Verdin, Hannah, Balikova, Irina, Casteels, Ingele, de Ravel, Thomy, Hull, Sarah, Suzani, Martina, Destrée, Anne, Peng, Michelle, Williams, Denise, Ainsworth, John R., Webster, Andrew R., Leroy, Bart P., Moore, Anthony T., De Baere, Elfride
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31992737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57338-2
_version_ 1783492107069030400
author Almoallem, Basamat
Arno, Gavin
De Zaeytijd, Julie
Verdin, Hannah
Balikova, Irina
Casteels, Ingele
de Ravel, Thomy
Hull, Sarah
Suzani, Martina
Destrée, Anne
Peng, Michelle
Williams, Denise
Ainsworth, John R.
Webster, Andrew R.
Leroy, Bart P.
Moore, Anthony T.
De Baere, Elfride
author_facet Almoallem, Basamat
Arno, Gavin
De Zaeytijd, Julie
Verdin, Hannah
Balikova, Irina
Casteels, Ingele
de Ravel, Thomy
Hull, Sarah
Suzani, Martina
Destrée, Anne
Peng, Michelle
Williams, Denise
Ainsworth, John R.
Webster, Andrew R.
Leroy, Bart P.
Moore, Anthony T.
De Baere, Elfride
author_sort Almoallem, Basamat
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to genetically and clinically characterize a unique cohort of 25 individuals from 21 unrelated families with autosomal recessive nanophthalmos (NNO) and posterior microphthalmia (MCOP) from different ethnicities. An ophthalmological assessment in all families was followed by targeted MFRP and PRSS56 testing in 20 families and whole-genome sequencing in one family. Three families underwent homozygosity mapping using SNP arrays. Eight distinct MFRP mutations were found in 10/21 families (47.6%), five of which are novel including a deletion spanning the 5′ untranslated region and the first coding part of exon 1. Most cases harbored homozygous mutations (8/10), while a compound heterozygous and a monoallelic genotype were identified in the remaining ones (2/10). Six distinct PRSS56 mutations were found in 9/21 (42.9%) families, three of which are novel. Similarly, homozygous mutations were found in all but one, leaving 2/21 families (9.5%) without a molecular diagnosis. Clinically, all patients had reduced visual acuity, hyperopia, short axial length and crowded optic discs. Retinitis pigmentosa was observed in 5/10 (50%) of the MFRP group, papillomacular folds in 12/19 (63.2%) of MCOP and in 3/6 (50%) of NNO cases. A considerable phenotypic variability was observed, with no clear genotype-phenotype correlations. Overall, our study represents the largest NNO and MCOP cohort reported to date and provides a genetic diagnosis in 19/21 families (90.5%), including the first MFRP genomic rearrangement, offering opportunities for gene-based therapies in MFRP-associated disease. Finally, our study underscores the importance of sequence and copy number analysis of the MFRP and PRSS56 genes in MCOP and NNO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6987234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69872342020-02-03 The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56 Almoallem, Basamat Arno, Gavin De Zaeytijd, Julie Verdin, Hannah Balikova, Irina Casteels, Ingele de Ravel, Thomy Hull, Sarah Suzani, Martina Destrée, Anne Peng, Michelle Williams, Denise Ainsworth, John R. Webster, Andrew R. Leroy, Bart P. Moore, Anthony T. De Baere, Elfride Sci Rep Article This study aimed to genetically and clinically characterize a unique cohort of 25 individuals from 21 unrelated families with autosomal recessive nanophthalmos (NNO) and posterior microphthalmia (MCOP) from different ethnicities. An ophthalmological assessment in all families was followed by targeted MFRP and PRSS56 testing in 20 families and whole-genome sequencing in one family. Three families underwent homozygosity mapping using SNP arrays. Eight distinct MFRP mutations were found in 10/21 families (47.6%), five of which are novel including a deletion spanning the 5′ untranslated region and the first coding part of exon 1. Most cases harbored homozygous mutations (8/10), while a compound heterozygous and a monoallelic genotype were identified in the remaining ones (2/10). Six distinct PRSS56 mutations were found in 9/21 (42.9%) families, three of which are novel. Similarly, homozygous mutations were found in all but one, leaving 2/21 families (9.5%) without a molecular diagnosis. Clinically, all patients had reduced visual acuity, hyperopia, short axial length and crowded optic discs. Retinitis pigmentosa was observed in 5/10 (50%) of the MFRP group, papillomacular folds in 12/19 (63.2%) of MCOP and in 3/6 (50%) of NNO cases. A considerable phenotypic variability was observed, with no clear genotype-phenotype correlations. Overall, our study represents the largest NNO and MCOP cohort reported to date and provides a genetic diagnosis in 19/21 families (90.5%), including the first MFRP genomic rearrangement, offering opportunities for gene-based therapies in MFRP-associated disease. Finally, our study underscores the importance of sequence and copy number analysis of the MFRP and PRSS56 genes in MCOP and NNO. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6987234/ /pubmed/31992737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57338-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Almoallem, Basamat
Arno, Gavin
De Zaeytijd, Julie
Verdin, Hannah
Balikova, Irina
Casteels, Ingele
de Ravel, Thomy
Hull, Sarah
Suzani, Martina
Destrée, Anne
Peng, Michelle
Williams, Denise
Ainsworth, John R.
Webster, Andrew R.
Leroy, Bart P.
Moore, Anthony T.
De Baere, Elfride
The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56
title The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56
title_full The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56
title_fullStr The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56
title_full_unstemmed The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56
title_short The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56
title_sort majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in mfrp and prss56
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31992737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57338-2
work_keys_str_mv AT almoallembasamat themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT arnogavin themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT dezaeytijdjulie themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT verdinhannah themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT balikovairina themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT casteelsingele themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT deravelthomy themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT hullsarah themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT suzanimartina themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT destreeanne themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT pengmichelle themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT williamsdenise themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT ainsworthjohnr themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT websterandrewr themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT leroybartp themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT mooreanthonyt themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT debaereelfride themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT almoallembasamat majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT arnogavin majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT dezaeytijdjulie majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT verdinhannah majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT balikovairina majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT casteelsingele majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT deravelthomy majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT hullsarah majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT suzanimartina majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT destreeanne majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT pengmichelle majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT williamsdenise majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT ainsworthjohnr majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT websterandrewr majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT leroybartp majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT mooreanthonyt majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56
AT debaereelfride majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56