Cargando…
The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56
This study aimed to genetically and clinically characterize a unique cohort of 25 individuals from 21 unrelated families with autosomal recessive nanophthalmos (NNO) and posterior microphthalmia (MCOP) from different ethnicities. An ophthalmological assessment in all families was followed by targete...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31992737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57338-2 |
_version_ | 1783492107069030400 |
---|---|
author | Almoallem, Basamat Arno, Gavin De Zaeytijd, Julie Verdin, Hannah Balikova, Irina Casteels, Ingele de Ravel, Thomy Hull, Sarah Suzani, Martina Destrée, Anne Peng, Michelle Williams, Denise Ainsworth, John R. Webster, Andrew R. Leroy, Bart P. Moore, Anthony T. De Baere, Elfride |
author_facet | Almoallem, Basamat Arno, Gavin De Zaeytijd, Julie Verdin, Hannah Balikova, Irina Casteels, Ingele de Ravel, Thomy Hull, Sarah Suzani, Martina Destrée, Anne Peng, Michelle Williams, Denise Ainsworth, John R. Webster, Andrew R. Leroy, Bart P. Moore, Anthony T. De Baere, Elfride |
author_sort | Almoallem, Basamat |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to genetically and clinically characterize a unique cohort of 25 individuals from 21 unrelated families with autosomal recessive nanophthalmos (NNO) and posterior microphthalmia (MCOP) from different ethnicities. An ophthalmological assessment in all families was followed by targeted MFRP and PRSS56 testing in 20 families and whole-genome sequencing in one family. Three families underwent homozygosity mapping using SNP arrays. Eight distinct MFRP mutations were found in 10/21 families (47.6%), five of which are novel including a deletion spanning the 5′ untranslated region and the first coding part of exon 1. Most cases harbored homozygous mutations (8/10), while a compound heterozygous and a monoallelic genotype were identified in the remaining ones (2/10). Six distinct PRSS56 mutations were found in 9/21 (42.9%) families, three of which are novel. Similarly, homozygous mutations were found in all but one, leaving 2/21 families (9.5%) without a molecular diagnosis. Clinically, all patients had reduced visual acuity, hyperopia, short axial length and crowded optic discs. Retinitis pigmentosa was observed in 5/10 (50%) of the MFRP group, papillomacular folds in 12/19 (63.2%) of MCOP and in 3/6 (50%) of NNO cases. A considerable phenotypic variability was observed, with no clear genotype-phenotype correlations. Overall, our study represents the largest NNO and MCOP cohort reported to date and provides a genetic diagnosis in 19/21 families (90.5%), including the first MFRP genomic rearrangement, offering opportunities for gene-based therapies in MFRP-associated disease. Finally, our study underscores the importance of sequence and copy number analysis of the MFRP and PRSS56 genes in MCOP and NNO. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6987234 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69872342020-02-03 The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56 Almoallem, Basamat Arno, Gavin De Zaeytijd, Julie Verdin, Hannah Balikova, Irina Casteels, Ingele de Ravel, Thomy Hull, Sarah Suzani, Martina Destrée, Anne Peng, Michelle Williams, Denise Ainsworth, John R. Webster, Andrew R. Leroy, Bart P. Moore, Anthony T. De Baere, Elfride Sci Rep Article This study aimed to genetically and clinically characterize a unique cohort of 25 individuals from 21 unrelated families with autosomal recessive nanophthalmos (NNO) and posterior microphthalmia (MCOP) from different ethnicities. An ophthalmological assessment in all families was followed by targeted MFRP and PRSS56 testing in 20 families and whole-genome sequencing in one family. Three families underwent homozygosity mapping using SNP arrays. Eight distinct MFRP mutations were found in 10/21 families (47.6%), five of which are novel including a deletion spanning the 5′ untranslated region and the first coding part of exon 1. Most cases harbored homozygous mutations (8/10), while a compound heterozygous and a monoallelic genotype were identified in the remaining ones (2/10). Six distinct PRSS56 mutations were found in 9/21 (42.9%) families, three of which are novel. Similarly, homozygous mutations were found in all but one, leaving 2/21 families (9.5%) without a molecular diagnosis. Clinically, all patients had reduced visual acuity, hyperopia, short axial length and crowded optic discs. Retinitis pigmentosa was observed in 5/10 (50%) of the MFRP group, papillomacular folds in 12/19 (63.2%) of MCOP and in 3/6 (50%) of NNO cases. A considerable phenotypic variability was observed, with no clear genotype-phenotype correlations. Overall, our study represents the largest NNO and MCOP cohort reported to date and provides a genetic diagnosis in 19/21 families (90.5%), including the first MFRP genomic rearrangement, offering opportunities for gene-based therapies in MFRP-associated disease. Finally, our study underscores the importance of sequence and copy number analysis of the MFRP and PRSS56 genes in MCOP and NNO. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6987234/ /pubmed/31992737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57338-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Almoallem, Basamat Arno, Gavin De Zaeytijd, Julie Verdin, Hannah Balikova, Irina Casteels, Ingele de Ravel, Thomy Hull, Sarah Suzani, Martina Destrée, Anne Peng, Michelle Williams, Denise Ainsworth, John R. Webster, Andrew R. Leroy, Bart P. Moore, Anthony T. De Baere, Elfride The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56 |
title | The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56 |
title_full | The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56 |
title_fullStr | The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56 |
title_full_unstemmed | The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56 |
title_short | The majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in MFRP and PRSS56 |
title_sort | majority of autosomal recessive nanophthalmos and posterior microphthalmia can be attributed to biallelic sequence and structural variants in mfrp and prss56 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987234/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31992737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57338-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almoallembasamat themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT arnogavin themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT dezaeytijdjulie themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT verdinhannah themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT balikovairina themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT casteelsingele themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT deravelthomy themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT hullsarah themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT suzanimartina themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT destreeanne themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT pengmichelle themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT williamsdenise themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT ainsworthjohnr themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT websterandrewr themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT leroybartp themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT mooreanthonyt themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT debaereelfride themajorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT almoallembasamat majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT arnogavin majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT dezaeytijdjulie majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT verdinhannah majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT balikovairina majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT casteelsingele majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT deravelthomy majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT hullsarah majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT suzanimartina majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT destreeanne majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT pengmichelle majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT williamsdenise majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT ainsworthjohnr majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT websterandrewr majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT leroybartp majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT mooreanthonyt majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 AT debaereelfride majorityofautosomalrecessivenanophthalmosandposteriormicrophthalmiacanbeattributedtobiallelicsequenceandstructuralvariantsinmfrpandprss56 |