Cargando…

Artificial intelligence in bone age assessment: accuracy and efficiency of a novel fully automated algorithm compared to the Greulich-Pyle method

BACKGROUND: Bone age (BA) assessment performed by artificial intelligence (AI) is of growing interest due to improved accuracy, precision and time efficiency in daily routine. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and efficiency of a novel AI software version for automated BA assessm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Booz, Christian, Yel, Ibrahim, Wichmann, Julian L., Boettger, Sabine, Al Kamali, Ahmed, Albrecht, Moritz H., Martin, Simon S., Lenga, Lukas, Huizinga, Nicole A., D’Angelo, Tommaso, Cavallaro, Marco, Vogl, Thomas J., Bodelle, Boris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0139-9
_version_ 1783492115018285056
author Booz, Christian
Yel, Ibrahim
Wichmann, Julian L.
Boettger, Sabine
Al Kamali, Ahmed
Albrecht, Moritz H.
Martin, Simon S.
Lenga, Lukas
Huizinga, Nicole A.
D’Angelo, Tommaso
Cavallaro, Marco
Vogl, Thomas J.
Bodelle, Boris
author_facet Booz, Christian
Yel, Ibrahim
Wichmann, Julian L.
Boettger, Sabine
Al Kamali, Ahmed
Albrecht, Moritz H.
Martin, Simon S.
Lenga, Lukas
Huizinga, Nicole A.
D’Angelo, Tommaso
Cavallaro, Marco
Vogl, Thomas J.
Bodelle, Boris
author_sort Booz, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bone age (BA) assessment performed by artificial intelligence (AI) is of growing interest due to improved accuracy, precision and time efficiency in daily routine. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and efficiency of a novel AI software version for automated BA assessment in comparison to the Greulich-Pyle method. METHODS: Radiographs of 514 patients were analysed in this retrospective study. Total BA was assessed independently by three blinded radiologists applying the GP method and by the AI software. Overall and gender-specific BA assessment results, as well as reading times of both approaches, were compared, while the reference BA was defined by two blinded experienced paediatric radiologists in consensus by application of the Greulich-Pyle method. RESULTS: Mean absolute deviation (MAD) and root mean square deviation (RSMD) were significantly lower between AI-derived BA and reference BA (MAD 0.34 years, RSMD 0.38 years) than between reader-calculated BA and reference BA (MAD 0.79 years, RSMD 0.89 years; p < 0.001). The correlation between AI-derived BA and reference BA (r = 0.99) was significantly higher than between reader-calculated BA and reference BA (r = 0.90; p < 0.001). No statistical difference was found in reader agreement and correlation analyses regarding gender (p = 0.241). Mean reading times were reduced by 87% using the AI system. CONCLUSIONS: A novel AI software enabled highly accurate automated BA assessment. It may improve efficiency in clinical routine by reducing reading times without compromising the accuracy compared with the Greulich-Pyle method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6987270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69872702020-02-11 Artificial intelligence in bone age assessment: accuracy and efficiency of a novel fully automated algorithm compared to the Greulich-Pyle method Booz, Christian Yel, Ibrahim Wichmann, Julian L. Boettger, Sabine Al Kamali, Ahmed Albrecht, Moritz H. Martin, Simon S. Lenga, Lukas Huizinga, Nicole A. D’Angelo, Tommaso Cavallaro, Marco Vogl, Thomas J. Bodelle, Boris Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: Bone age (BA) assessment performed by artificial intelligence (AI) is of growing interest due to improved accuracy, precision and time efficiency in daily routine. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and efficiency of a novel AI software version for automated BA assessment in comparison to the Greulich-Pyle method. METHODS: Radiographs of 514 patients were analysed in this retrospective study. Total BA was assessed independently by three blinded radiologists applying the GP method and by the AI software. Overall and gender-specific BA assessment results, as well as reading times of both approaches, were compared, while the reference BA was defined by two blinded experienced paediatric radiologists in consensus by application of the Greulich-Pyle method. RESULTS: Mean absolute deviation (MAD) and root mean square deviation (RSMD) were significantly lower between AI-derived BA and reference BA (MAD 0.34 years, RSMD 0.38 years) than between reader-calculated BA and reference BA (MAD 0.79 years, RSMD 0.89 years; p < 0.001). The correlation between AI-derived BA and reference BA (r = 0.99) was significantly higher than between reader-calculated BA and reference BA (r = 0.90; p < 0.001). No statistical difference was found in reader agreement and correlation analyses regarding gender (p = 0.241). Mean reading times were reduced by 87% using the AI system. CONCLUSIONS: A novel AI software enabled highly accurate automated BA assessment. It may improve efficiency in clinical routine by reducing reading times without compromising the accuracy compared with the Greulich-Pyle method. Springer International Publishing 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6987270/ /pubmed/31993795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0139-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Booz, Christian
Yel, Ibrahim
Wichmann, Julian L.
Boettger, Sabine
Al Kamali, Ahmed
Albrecht, Moritz H.
Martin, Simon S.
Lenga, Lukas
Huizinga, Nicole A.
D’Angelo, Tommaso
Cavallaro, Marco
Vogl, Thomas J.
Bodelle, Boris
Artificial intelligence in bone age assessment: accuracy and efficiency of a novel fully automated algorithm compared to the Greulich-Pyle method
title Artificial intelligence in bone age assessment: accuracy and efficiency of a novel fully automated algorithm compared to the Greulich-Pyle method
title_full Artificial intelligence in bone age assessment: accuracy and efficiency of a novel fully automated algorithm compared to the Greulich-Pyle method
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence in bone age assessment: accuracy and efficiency of a novel fully automated algorithm compared to the Greulich-Pyle method
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence in bone age assessment: accuracy and efficiency of a novel fully automated algorithm compared to the Greulich-Pyle method
title_short Artificial intelligence in bone age assessment: accuracy and efficiency of a novel fully automated algorithm compared to the Greulich-Pyle method
title_sort artificial intelligence in bone age assessment: accuracy and efficiency of a novel fully automated algorithm compared to the greulich-pyle method
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-019-0139-9
work_keys_str_mv AT boozchristian artificialintelligenceinboneageassessmentaccuracyandefficiencyofanovelfullyautomatedalgorithmcomparedtothegreulichpylemethod
AT yelibrahim artificialintelligenceinboneageassessmentaccuracyandefficiencyofanovelfullyautomatedalgorithmcomparedtothegreulichpylemethod
AT wichmannjulianl artificialintelligenceinboneageassessmentaccuracyandefficiencyofanovelfullyautomatedalgorithmcomparedtothegreulichpylemethod
AT boettgersabine artificialintelligenceinboneageassessmentaccuracyandefficiencyofanovelfullyautomatedalgorithmcomparedtothegreulichpylemethod
AT alkamaliahmed artificialintelligenceinboneageassessmentaccuracyandefficiencyofanovelfullyautomatedalgorithmcomparedtothegreulichpylemethod
AT albrechtmoritzh artificialintelligenceinboneageassessmentaccuracyandefficiencyofanovelfullyautomatedalgorithmcomparedtothegreulichpylemethod
AT martinsimons artificialintelligenceinboneageassessmentaccuracyandefficiencyofanovelfullyautomatedalgorithmcomparedtothegreulichpylemethod
AT lengalukas artificialintelligenceinboneageassessmentaccuracyandefficiencyofanovelfullyautomatedalgorithmcomparedtothegreulichpylemethod
AT huizinganicolea artificialintelligenceinboneageassessmentaccuracyandefficiencyofanovelfullyautomatedalgorithmcomparedtothegreulichpylemethod
AT dangelotommaso artificialintelligenceinboneageassessmentaccuracyandefficiencyofanovelfullyautomatedalgorithmcomparedtothegreulichpylemethod
AT cavallaromarco artificialintelligenceinboneageassessmentaccuracyandefficiencyofanovelfullyautomatedalgorithmcomparedtothegreulichpylemethod
AT voglthomasj artificialintelligenceinboneageassessmentaccuracyandefficiencyofanovelfullyautomatedalgorithmcomparedtothegreulichpylemethod
AT bodelleboris artificialintelligenceinboneageassessmentaccuracyandefficiencyofanovelfullyautomatedalgorithmcomparedtothegreulichpylemethod