Cargando…

You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs

In many real-world settings, individuals rarely present another person’s ID, which increases the likelihood that a screener will fail to detect it. Three experiments examined how within-person variability (i.e., differences between two images of the same person) and feedback may have influenced crit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weatherford, Dawn R., Erickson, William Blake, Thomas, Jasmyne, Walker, Mary E., Schein, Barret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0204-1
_version_ 1783492115257360384
author Weatherford, Dawn R.
Erickson, William Blake
Thomas, Jasmyne
Walker, Mary E.
Schein, Barret
author_facet Weatherford, Dawn R.
Erickson, William Blake
Thomas, Jasmyne
Walker, Mary E.
Schein, Barret
author_sort Weatherford, Dawn R.
collection PubMed
description In many real-world settings, individuals rarely present another person’s ID, which increases the likelihood that a screener will fail to detect it. Three experiments examined how within-person variability (i.e., differences between two images of the same person) and feedback may have influenced criterion shifting, thought to be one of the sources of the low-prevalence effect (LPE). Participants made identity judgments of a target face and an ID under either high, medium, or low mismatch prevalence. Feedback appeared after every trial, only error trials, or no trials. Experiment 1 used two controlled images taken on the same day. Experiment 2 used two controlled images taken at least 6 months apart. Experiment 3 used one controlled and one ambient image taken at least 1 year apart. Importantly, receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that feedback and greater within-person variability exacerbated the LPE by affecting both criterion and discriminability. These results carry implications for many real-world settings, such as border crossings and airports, where identity screening plays a major role in securing public safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6987271
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69872712020-02-11 You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs Weatherford, Dawn R. Erickson, William Blake Thomas, Jasmyne Walker, Mary E. Schein, Barret Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article In many real-world settings, individuals rarely present another person’s ID, which increases the likelihood that a screener will fail to detect it. Three experiments examined how within-person variability (i.e., differences between two images of the same person) and feedback may have influenced criterion shifting, thought to be one of the sources of the low-prevalence effect (LPE). Participants made identity judgments of a target face and an ID under either high, medium, or low mismatch prevalence. Feedback appeared after every trial, only error trials, or no trials. Experiment 1 used two controlled images taken on the same day. Experiment 2 used two controlled images taken at least 6 months apart. Experiment 3 used one controlled and one ambient image taken at least 1 year apart. Importantly, receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that feedback and greater within-person variability exacerbated the LPE by affecting both criterion and discriminability. These results carry implications for many real-world settings, such as border crossings and airports, where identity screening plays a major role in securing public safety. Springer International Publishing 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6987271/ /pubmed/31993804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0204-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Weatherford, Dawn R.
Erickson, William Blake
Thomas, Jasmyne
Walker, Mary E.
Schein, Barret
You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs
title You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs
title_full You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs
title_fullStr You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs
title_full_unstemmed You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs
title_short You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs
title_sort you shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake ids
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987271/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0204-1
work_keys_str_mv AT weatherforddawnr youshallnotpasshowfacialvariabilityandfeedbackaffectthedetectionoflowprevalencefakeids
AT ericksonwilliamblake youshallnotpasshowfacialvariabilityandfeedbackaffectthedetectionoflowprevalencefakeids
AT thomasjasmyne youshallnotpasshowfacialvariabilityandfeedbackaffectthedetectionoflowprevalencefakeids
AT walkermarye youshallnotpasshowfacialvariabilityandfeedbackaffectthedetectionoflowprevalencefakeids
AT scheinbarret youshallnotpasshowfacialvariabilityandfeedbackaffectthedetectionoflowprevalencefakeids