Cargando…
You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs
In many real-world settings, individuals rarely present another person’s ID, which increases the likelihood that a screener will fail to detect it. Three experiments examined how within-person variability (i.e., differences between two images of the same person) and feedback may have influenced crit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0204-1 |
_version_ | 1783492115257360384 |
---|---|
author | Weatherford, Dawn R. Erickson, William Blake Thomas, Jasmyne Walker, Mary E. Schein, Barret |
author_facet | Weatherford, Dawn R. Erickson, William Blake Thomas, Jasmyne Walker, Mary E. Schein, Barret |
author_sort | Weatherford, Dawn R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In many real-world settings, individuals rarely present another person’s ID, which increases the likelihood that a screener will fail to detect it. Three experiments examined how within-person variability (i.e., differences between two images of the same person) and feedback may have influenced criterion shifting, thought to be one of the sources of the low-prevalence effect (LPE). Participants made identity judgments of a target face and an ID under either high, medium, or low mismatch prevalence. Feedback appeared after every trial, only error trials, or no trials. Experiment 1 used two controlled images taken on the same day. Experiment 2 used two controlled images taken at least 6 months apart. Experiment 3 used one controlled and one ambient image taken at least 1 year apart. Importantly, receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that feedback and greater within-person variability exacerbated the LPE by affecting both criterion and discriminability. These results carry implications for many real-world settings, such as border crossings and airports, where identity screening plays a major role in securing public safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6987271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69872712020-02-11 You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs Weatherford, Dawn R. Erickson, William Blake Thomas, Jasmyne Walker, Mary E. Schein, Barret Cogn Res Princ Implic Original Article In many real-world settings, individuals rarely present another person’s ID, which increases the likelihood that a screener will fail to detect it. Three experiments examined how within-person variability (i.e., differences between two images of the same person) and feedback may have influenced criterion shifting, thought to be one of the sources of the low-prevalence effect (LPE). Participants made identity judgments of a target face and an ID under either high, medium, or low mismatch prevalence. Feedback appeared after every trial, only error trials, or no trials. Experiment 1 used two controlled images taken on the same day. Experiment 2 used two controlled images taken at least 6 months apart. Experiment 3 used one controlled and one ambient image taken at least 1 year apart. Importantly, receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that feedback and greater within-person variability exacerbated the LPE by affecting both criterion and discriminability. These results carry implications for many real-world settings, such as border crossings and airports, where identity screening plays a major role in securing public safety. Springer International Publishing 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6987271/ /pubmed/31993804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0204-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Weatherford, Dawn R. Erickson, William Blake Thomas, Jasmyne Walker, Mary E. Schein, Barret You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs |
title | You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs |
title_full | You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs |
title_fullStr | You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs |
title_full_unstemmed | You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs |
title_short | You shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake IDs |
title_sort | you shall not pass: how facial variability and feedback affect the detection of low-prevalence fake ids |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31993804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0204-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weatherforddawnr youshallnotpasshowfacialvariabilityandfeedbackaffectthedetectionoflowprevalencefakeids AT ericksonwilliamblake youshallnotpasshowfacialvariabilityandfeedbackaffectthedetectionoflowprevalencefakeids AT thomasjasmyne youshallnotpasshowfacialvariabilityandfeedbackaffectthedetectionoflowprevalencefakeids AT walkermarye youshallnotpasshowfacialvariabilityandfeedbackaffectthedetectionoflowprevalencefakeids AT scheinbarret youshallnotpasshowfacialvariabilityandfeedbackaffectthedetectionoflowprevalencefakeids |