Cargando…

How does the body representation system develop in the human brain?

Exploration of the body representation system (BRS) from kinaesthetic illusions in fMRI has revealed a complex network composed of sensorimotor and frontoparietal components. Here, we evaluated the degree of maturity of this network in children aged 7–11 years, and the extent to which structural fac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fontan, Aurelie, Cignetti, Fabien, Nazarian, Bruno, Anton, Jean-Luc, Vaugoyeau, Marianne, Assaiante, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28314184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.02.010
_version_ 1783492173252001792
author Fontan, Aurelie
Cignetti, Fabien
Nazarian, Bruno
Anton, Jean-Luc
Vaugoyeau, Marianne
Assaiante, Christine
author_facet Fontan, Aurelie
Cignetti, Fabien
Nazarian, Bruno
Anton, Jean-Luc
Vaugoyeau, Marianne
Assaiante, Christine
author_sort Fontan, Aurelie
collection PubMed
description Exploration of the body representation system (BRS) from kinaesthetic illusions in fMRI has revealed a complex network composed of sensorimotor and frontoparietal components. Here, we evaluated the degree of maturity of this network in children aged 7–11 years, and the extent to which structural factors account for network differences with adults. Brain activation following tendon vibration at 100 Hz (‘illusion’) and 30 Hz (‘no illusion’) were analysed using the two-stage random effects model, with or without white and grey matter covariates. The BRS was already well established in children as revealed by the contrast ‘illusion’ vs ‘no illusion’, although still immature in some aspects. This included a lower level of activation in primary somatosensory and posterior parietal regions, and the exclusive activation of the frontopolar cortex (FPC) in children compared to adults. The former differences were related to structure, while the latter difference reflected a functional strategy where the FPC may serve as the ‘top’ in top-down modulation of the activity of the other BRS regions to facilitate the establishment of body representations. Hence, the development of the BRS not only relies on structural maturation, but also involves the disengagement of an executive region not classically involved in body processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6987789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69877892020-02-03 How does the body representation system develop in the human brain? Fontan, Aurelie Cignetti, Fabien Nazarian, Bruno Anton, Jean-Luc Vaugoyeau, Marianne Assaiante, Christine Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research Exploration of the body representation system (BRS) from kinaesthetic illusions in fMRI has revealed a complex network composed of sensorimotor and frontoparietal components. Here, we evaluated the degree of maturity of this network in children aged 7–11 years, and the extent to which structural factors account for network differences with adults. Brain activation following tendon vibration at 100 Hz (‘illusion’) and 30 Hz (‘no illusion’) were analysed using the two-stage random effects model, with or without white and grey matter covariates. The BRS was already well established in children as revealed by the contrast ‘illusion’ vs ‘no illusion’, although still immature in some aspects. This included a lower level of activation in primary somatosensory and posterior parietal regions, and the exclusive activation of the frontopolar cortex (FPC) in children compared to adults. The former differences were related to structure, while the latter difference reflected a functional strategy where the FPC may serve as the ‘top’ in top-down modulation of the activity of the other BRS regions to facilitate the establishment of body representations. Hence, the development of the BRS not only relies on structural maturation, but also involves the disengagement of an executive region not classically involved in body processing. Elsevier 2017-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6987789/ /pubmed/28314184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.02.010 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Fontan, Aurelie
Cignetti, Fabien
Nazarian, Bruno
Anton, Jean-Luc
Vaugoyeau, Marianne
Assaiante, Christine
How does the body representation system develop in the human brain?
title How does the body representation system develop in the human brain?
title_full How does the body representation system develop in the human brain?
title_fullStr How does the body representation system develop in the human brain?
title_full_unstemmed How does the body representation system develop in the human brain?
title_short How does the body representation system develop in the human brain?
title_sort how does the body representation system develop in the human brain?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6987789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28314184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.02.010
work_keys_str_mv AT fontanaurelie howdoesthebodyrepresentationsystemdevelopinthehumanbrain
AT cignettifabien howdoesthebodyrepresentationsystemdevelopinthehumanbrain
AT nazarianbruno howdoesthebodyrepresentationsystemdevelopinthehumanbrain
AT antonjeanluc howdoesthebodyrepresentationsystemdevelopinthehumanbrain
AT vaugoyeaumarianne howdoesthebodyrepresentationsystemdevelopinthehumanbrain
AT assaiantechristine howdoesthebodyrepresentationsystemdevelopinthehumanbrain