Cargando…

Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (FORCE trial)

BACKGROUND: After low anterior resection (LAR), up to 90% of patients develop anorectal dysfunction. Especially fecal incontinence has a major impact on the physical, psychological, social, and emotional functioning of the patient but also on the Dutch National Healthcare budget with more than €2000...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalkdijk-Dijkstra, A.J., van der Heijden, J.A.G., van Westreenen, H.L., Broens, P.M.A., Trzpis, M., Pierie, J.P.E.N., Klarenbeek, B.R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31992358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4043-7
_version_ 1783492225869545472
author Kalkdijk-Dijkstra, A.J.
van der Heijden, J.A.G.
van Westreenen, H.L.
Broens, P.M.A.
Trzpis, M.
Pierie, J.P.E.N.
Klarenbeek, B.R.
author_facet Kalkdijk-Dijkstra, A.J.
van der Heijden, J.A.G.
van Westreenen, H.L.
Broens, P.M.A.
Trzpis, M.
Pierie, J.P.E.N.
Klarenbeek, B.R.
author_sort Kalkdijk-Dijkstra, A.J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: After low anterior resection (LAR), up to 90% of patients develop anorectal dysfunction. Especially fecal incontinence has a major impact on the physical, psychological, social, and emotional functioning of the patient but also on the Dutch National Healthcare budget with more than €2000 spent per patient per year. No standardized treatment is available to help these patients. Common treatment nowadays is focused on symptom relief, consisting of lifestyle advices and pharmacotherapy with bulking agents or antidiarrheal medication. Another possibility is pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR), which is one of the most important treatments for fecal incontinence in general, with success rates of 50–80%. No strong evidence is available for the use of PFR after LAR. This study aims to prove a beneficial effect of PFR on fecal incontinence, quality of life, and costs in rectal cancer patients after sphincter-saving surgery compared to standard treatment. METHODS: The FORCE trial is a multicenter, two-armed, randomized clinical trial. All patients that underwent LAR are recruited from the participating hospitals and randomized for either standard treatment or a standardized PFR program. A total of 128 patients should be randomized. Optimal blinding is not possible. Stratification will be done in variable blocks (gender and additional radiotherapy). The primary endpoint is the Wexner incontinence score; secondary endpoints are health-related and fecal-incontinence-related QoL and cost-effectiveness. Baseline measurements take place before randomization. The primary endpoint is measured 3 months after the start of the intervention, with a 1-year follow-up for sustainability research purposes. DISCUSSION: The results of this study may substantially improve postoperative care for patients with fecal incontinence or anorectal dysfunction after LAR. This section provides insight in the decisions that were made in the organization of this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registration, NTR5469, registered on 03-09-2015. Protocol FORCE trial V18, 19-09-2019. Sponsor Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6988240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69882402020-01-31 Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (FORCE trial) Kalkdijk-Dijkstra, A.J. van der Heijden, J.A.G. van Westreenen, H.L. Broens, P.M.A. Trzpis, M. Pierie, J.P.E.N. Klarenbeek, B.R. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: After low anterior resection (LAR), up to 90% of patients develop anorectal dysfunction. Especially fecal incontinence has a major impact on the physical, psychological, social, and emotional functioning of the patient but also on the Dutch National Healthcare budget with more than €2000 spent per patient per year. No standardized treatment is available to help these patients. Common treatment nowadays is focused on symptom relief, consisting of lifestyle advices and pharmacotherapy with bulking agents or antidiarrheal medication. Another possibility is pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR), which is one of the most important treatments for fecal incontinence in general, with success rates of 50–80%. No strong evidence is available for the use of PFR after LAR. This study aims to prove a beneficial effect of PFR on fecal incontinence, quality of life, and costs in rectal cancer patients after sphincter-saving surgery compared to standard treatment. METHODS: The FORCE trial is a multicenter, two-armed, randomized clinical trial. All patients that underwent LAR are recruited from the participating hospitals and randomized for either standard treatment or a standardized PFR program. A total of 128 patients should be randomized. Optimal blinding is not possible. Stratification will be done in variable blocks (gender and additional radiotherapy). The primary endpoint is the Wexner incontinence score; secondary endpoints are health-related and fecal-incontinence-related QoL and cost-effectiveness. Baseline measurements take place before randomization. The primary endpoint is measured 3 months after the start of the intervention, with a 1-year follow-up for sustainability research purposes. DISCUSSION: The results of this study may substantially improve postoperative care for patients with fecal incontinence or anorectal dysfunction after LAR. This section provides insight in the decisions that were made in the organization of this trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Registration, NTR5469, registered on 03-09-2015. Protocol FORCE trial V18, 19-09-2019. Sponsor Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen. BioMed Central 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6988240/ /pubmed/31992358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4043-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kalkdijk-Dijkstra, A.J.
van der Heijden, J.A.G.
van Westreenen, H.L.
Broens, P.M.A.
Trzpis, M.
Pierie, J.P.E.N.
Klarenbeek, B.R.
Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (FORCE trial)
title Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (FORCE trial)
title_full Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (FORCE trial)
title_fullStr Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (FORCE trial)
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (FORCE trial)
title_short Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (FORCE trial)
title_sort pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (force trial)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31992358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4043-7
work_keys_str_mv AT kalkdijkdijkstraaj pelvicfloorrehabilitationtoimprovefunctionaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftersurgeryforrectalcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforcetrial
AT vanderheijdenjag pelvicfloorrehabilitationtoimprovefunctionaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftersurgeryforrectalcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforcetrial
AT vanwestreenenhl pelvicfloorrehabilitationtoimprovefunctionaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftersurgeryforrectalcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforcetrial
AT broenspma pelvicfloorrehabilitationtoimprovefunctionaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftersurgeryforrectalcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforcetrial
AT trzpism pelvicfloorrehabilitationtoimprovefunctionaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftersurgeryforrectalcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforcetrial
AT pieriejpen pelvicfloorrehabilitationtoimprovefunctionaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftersurgeryforrectalcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforcetrial
AT klarenbeekbr pelvicfloorrehabilitationtoimprovefunctionaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftersurgeryforrectalcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforcetrial
AT pelvicfloorrehabilitationtoimprovefunctionaloutcomeandqualityoflifeaftersurgeryforrectalcancerstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforcetrial