Cargando…

Protocol for a systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent events in chronic conditions

BACKGROUND: Prognostic models for repeated events of the same type are highly useful in predicting when a patient may have a recurrence of a chronic disease or illness. Whilst methods are currently available for analysing recurrent event data in prognostic models, to our knowledge, most are not wide...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watson, Victoria, Tudur Smith, Catrin, Bonnett, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32016160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-020-0070-9
_version_ 1783492226611937280
author Watson, Victoria
Tudur Smith, Catrin
Bonnett, Laura
author_facet Watson, Victoria
Tudur Smith, Catrin
Bonnett, Laura
author_sort Watson, Victoria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prognostic models for repeated events of the same type are highly useful in predicting when a patient may have a recurrence of a chronic disease or illness. Whilst methods are currently available for analysing recurrent event data in prognostic models, to our knowledge, most are not widely known or applied in a medical setting. As a result, often only the first recurrence is analysed meaning valuable information for multiple recurrences is discarded. Therefore, the aim of this review is to systemically review models for repeated medical events of the same type, to determine what modelling techniques are available and how they are applied. METHODS: MEDLINE will be used as the primary method to search sources. Various databases from the Cochrane Library and EMBASE will also be searched. Trial registries such as Clinicaltrials.gov.uk will be searched, as will registered trials that are ongoing and not yet published. Abstracts submitted to conferences will also be searched, and non-English sources will also be considered. Studies to be included in the review will be decided based on PICO guidelines, where the study population and outcomes correspond to this study’s aims and target population. The prognostic models used in each study chosen for inclusion in the review will be summarised qualitatively. DISCUSSION: As recurrent event data is not widely analysed in prognostic models, the results from this systematic review will identify which methods are available and which are commonly used. It is also unknown if certain methods which will be identified in the review perform better given certain conditions. Therefore, if included studies assess predictive performance, the results of this review could also provide evidence to determine if certain models are better fitting dependant on the event rate of the chronic condition. The results will be used to determine if model selection varies across disease area. The review will also provide an insight into the development of any new methods used for analysing recurrent events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019116031).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6988243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69882432020-02-03 Protocol for a systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent events in chronic conditions Watson, Victoria Tudur Smith, Catrin Bonnett, Laura Diagn Progn Res Protocol BACKGROUND: Prognostic models for repeated events of the same type are highly useful in predicting when a patient may have a recurrence of a chronic disease or illness. Whilst methods are currently available for analysing recurrent event data in prognostic models, to our knowledge, most are not widely known or applied in a medical setting. As a result, often only the first recurrence is analysed meaning valuable information for multiple recurrences is discarded. Therefore, the aim of this review is to systemically review models for repeated medical events of the same type, to determine what modelling techniques are available and how they are applied. METHODS: MEDLINE will be used as the primary method to search sources. Various databases from the Cochrane Library and EMBASE will also be searched. Trial registries such as Clinicaltrials.gov.uk will be searched, as will registered trials that are ongoing and not yet published. Abstracts submitted to conferences will also be searched, and non-English sources will also be considered. Studies to be included in the review will be decided based on PICO guidelines, where the study population and outcomes correspond to this study’s aims and target population. The prognostic models used in each study chosen for inclusion in the review will be summarised qualitatively. DISCUSSION: As recurrent event data is not widely analysed in prognostic models, the results from this systematic review will identify which methods are available and which are commonly used. It is also unknown if certain methods which will be identified in the review perform better given certain conditions. Therefore, if included studies assess predictive performance, the results of this review could also provide evidence to determine if certain models are better fitting dependant on the event rate of the chronic condition. The results will be used to determine if model selection varies across disease area. The review will also provide an insight into the development of any new methods used for analysing recurrent events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019116031). BioMed Central 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6988243/ /pubmed/32016160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-020-0070-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Watson, Victoria
Tudur Smith, Catrin
Bonnett, Laura
Protocol for a systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent events in chronic conditions
title Protocol for a systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent events in chronic conditions
title_full Protocol for a systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent events in chronic conditions
title_fullStr Protocol for a systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent events in chronic conditions
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent events in chronic conditions
title_short Protocol for a systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent events in chronic conditions
title_sort protocol for a systematic review of prognostic models for recurrent events in chronic conditions
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32016160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-020-0070-9
work_keys_str_mv AT watsonvictoria protocolforasystematicreviewofprognosticmodelsforrecurrenteventsinchronicconditions
AT tudursmithcatrin protocolforasystematicreviewofprognosticmodelsforrecurrenteventsinchronicconditions
AT bonnettlaura protocolforasystematicreviewofprognosticmodelsforrecurrenteventsinchronicconditions