Cargando…

SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience

BACKGROUND: Due to uniform stiffness of standard platinum coils, dense packing of intracranial aneurysms can be difficult to achieve, since stiffer coils can cause microcatheter prolapse or coil migration. SMART coils have a varying softness along the length of the coils to improve deliverability. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel, Behme, Henrik, Sack, Ioannis, Tsogkas, Veit, Rohde, Marios-Nikos, Psychogios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-1623-9
_version_ 1783492237734182912
author Daniel, Behme
Henrik, Sack
Ioannis, Tsogkas
Veit, Rohde
Marios-Nikos, Psychogios
author_facet Daniel, Behme
Henrik, Sack
Ioannis, Tsogkas
Veit, Rohde
Marios-Nikos, Psychogios
author_sort Daniel, Behme
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to uniform stiffness of standard platinum coils, dense packing of intracranial aneurysms can be difficult to achieve, since stiffer coils can cause microcatheter prolapse or coil migration. SMART coils have a varying softness along the length of the coils to improve deliverability. We report our initial 2 year experience with the SMART coil system, including direct and follow-up results. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent coil embolization of an intracranial aneurysm with SMART coils between July 2016 and August 2018 at our institution. We analyzed clinical and angiographic data before and directly after treatment as well as at 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients harboring 49 aneurysms were treated; 23 (47%) were ruptured aneurysms. Most aneurysms (57%) were located in the anterior circulation. Median patient age was 55 (31–88), 63% were female. Mean aneurysm size was: neck 3.4 (±1.5), height 6.3 (±2.9) and width 5.2 (±2.3) mm. SMART coils were solely used in 96% of cases. Initial favorable angiographic results were achieved in 45 (92%) of 49 cases, which were stable at 6 months in 26/29 (90%). Thromboembolic complications occurred in 4 (8%) cases without clinical sequelae; microcatheter prolapse occurred in 1 case. No aneurysm rupture or device malfunction was observed. CONCLUSION: The treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms with SMART Coils was safe and efficacious in our cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6988290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69882902020-01-31 SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience Daniel, Behme Henrik, Sack Ioannis, Tsogkas Veit, Rohde Marios-Nikos, Psychogios BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Due to uniform stiffness of standard platinum coils, dense packing of intracranial aneurysms can be difficult to achieve, since stiffer coils can cause microcatheter prolapse or coil migration. SMART coils have a varying softness along the length of the coils to improve deliverability. We report our initial 2 year experience with the SMART coil system, including direct and follow-up results. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent coil embolization of an intracranial aneurysm with SMART coils between July 2016 and August 2018 at our institution. We analyzed clinical and angiographic data before and directly after treatment as well as at 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients harboring 49 aneurysms were treated; 23 (47%) were ruptured aneurysms. Most aneurysms (57%) were located in the anterior circulation. Median patient age was 55 (31–88), 63% were female. Mean aneurysm size was: neck 3.4 (±1.5), height 6.3 (±2.9) and width 5.2 (±2.3) mm. SMART coils were solely used in 96% of cases. Initial favorable angiographic results were achieved in 45 (92%) of 49 cases, which were stable at 6 months in 26/29 (90%). Thromboembolic complications occurred in 4 (8%) cases without clinical sequelae; microcatheter prolapse occurred in 1 case. No aneurysm rupture or device malfunction was observed. CONCLUSION: The treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms with SMART Coils was safe and efficacious in our cohort. BioMed Central 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6988290/ /pubmed/31996152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-1623-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Daniel, Behme
Henrik, Sack
Ioannis, Tsogkas
Veit, Rohde
Marios-Nikos, Psychogios
SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience
title SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience
title_full SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience
title_fullStr SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience
title_full_unstemmed SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience
title_short SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience
title_sort smart coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988290/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-1623-9
work_keys_str_mv AT danielbehme smartcoilsforintracranialaneurysmrepairasinglecenterexperience
AT henriksack smartcoilsforintracranialaneurysmrepairasinglecenterexperience
AT ioannistsogkas smartcoilsforintracranialaneurysmrepairasinglecenterexperience
AT veitrohde smartcoilsforintracranialaneurysmrepairasinglecenterexperience
AT mariosnikospsychogios smartcoilsforintracranialaneurysmrepairasinglecenterexperience