Cargando…
SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience
BACKGROUND: Due to uniform stiffness of standard platinum coils, dense packing of intracranial aneurysms can be difficult to achieve, since stiffer coils can cause microcatheter prolapse or coil migration. SMART coils have a varying softness along the length of the coils to improve deliverability. W...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-1623-9 |
_version_ | 1783492237734182912 |
---|---|
author | Daniel, Behme Henrik, Sack Ioannis, Tsogkas Veit, Rohde Marios-Nikos, Psychogios |
author_facet | Daniel, Behme Henrik, Sack Ioannis, Tsogkas Veit, Rohde Marios-Nikos, Psychogios |
author_sort | Daniel, Behme |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Due to uniform stiffness of standard platinum coils, dense packing of intracranial aneurysms can be difficult to achieve, since stiffer coils can cause microcatheter prolapse or coil migration. SMART coils have a varying softness along the length of the coils to improve deliverability. We report our initial 2 year experience with the SMART coil system, including direct and follow-up results. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent coil embolization of an intracranial aneurysm with SMART coils between July 2016 and August 2018 at our institution. We analyzed clinical and angiographic data before and directly after treatment as well as at 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients harboring 49 aneurysms were treated; 23 (47%) were ruptured aneurysms. Most aneurysms (57%) were located in the anterior circulation. Median patient age was 55 (31–88), 63% were female. Mean aneurysm size was: neck 3.4 (±1.5), height 6.3 (±2.9) and width 5.2 (±2.3) mm. SMART coils were solely used in 96% of cases. Initial favorable angiographic results were achieved in 45 (92%) of 49 cases, which were stable at 6 months in 26/29 (90%). Thromboembolic complications occurred in 4 (8%) cases without clinical sequelae; microcatheter prolapse occurred in 1 case. No aneurysm rupture or device malfunction was observed. CONCLUSION: The treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms with SMART Coils was safe and efficacious in our cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6988290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69882902020-01-31 SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience Daniel, Behme Henrik, Sack Ioannis, Tsogkas Veit, Rohde Marios-Nikos, Psychogios BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Due to uniform stiffness of standard platinum coils, dense packing of intracranial aneurysms can be difficult to achieve, since stiffer coils can cause microcatheter prolapse or coil migration. SMART coils have a varying softness along the length of the coils to improve deliverability. We report our initial 2 year experience with the SMART coil system, including direct and follow-up results. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all patients who underwent coil embolization of an intracranial aneurysm with SMART coils between July 2016 and August 2018 at our institution. We analyzed clinical and angiographic data before and directly after treatment as well as at 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients harboring 49 aneurysms were treated; 23 (47%) were ruptured aneurysms. Most aneurysms (57%) were located in the anterior circulation. Median patient age was 55 (31–88), 63% were female. Mean aneurysm size was: neck 3.4 (±1.5), height 6.3 (±2.9) and width 5.2 (±2.3) mm. SMART coils were solely used in 96% of cases. Initial favorable angiographic results were achieved in 45 (92%) of 49 cases, which were stable at 6 months in 26/29 (90%). Thromboembolic complications occurred in 4 (8%) cases without clinical sequelae; microcatheter prolapse occurred in 1 case. No aneurysm rupture or device malfunction was observed. CONCLUSION: The treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms with SMART Coils was safe and efficacious in our cohort. BioMed Central 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6988290/ /pubmed/31996152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-1623-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Daniel, Behme Henrik, Sack Ioannis, Tsogkas Veit, Rohde Marios-Nikos, Psychogios SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience |
title | SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience |
title_full | SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience |
title_fullStr | SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience |
title_full_unstemmed | SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience |
title_short | SMART coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience |
title_sort | smart coils for intracranial aneurysm repair – a single center experience |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-1623-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danielbehme smartcoilsforintracranialaneurysmrepairasinglecenterexperience AT henriksack smartcoilsforintracranialaneurysmrepairasinglecenterexperience AT ioannistsogkas smartcoilsforintracranialaneurysmrepairasinglecenterexperience AT veitrohde smartcoilsforintracranialaneurysmrepairasinglecenterexperience AT mariosnikospsychogios smartcoilsforintracranialaneurysmrepairasinglecenterexperience |