Cargando…

Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of 2D and 3D strain analyses was evaluated by comparing strain and cardiac function parameters in Fontan repair patients and normal child volunteers. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 32 patients with Fontan circulation and 32 child volunteers who had undergone clinical c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Liwei, Wang, Qian, Gregory, Barton P., Ouyang, Rong Zhen, Sun, Aimin, Guo, Chen, Han, Tongtong, Zhong, Yumin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31992224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-0413-6
_version_ 1783492239594356736
author Hu, Liwei
Wang, Qian
Gregory, Barton P.
Ouyang, Rong Zhen
Sun, Aimin
Guo, Chen
Han, Tongtong
Zhong, Yumin
author_facet Hu, Liwei
Wang, Qian
Gregory, Barton P.
Ouyang, Rong Zhen
Sun, Aimin
Guo, Chen
Han, Tongtong
Zhong, Yumin
author_sort Hu, Liwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The accuracy of 2D and 3D strain analyses was evaluated by comparing strain and cardiac function parameters in Fontan repair patients and normal child volunteers. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 32 patients with Fontan circulation and 32 child volunteers who had undergone clinical cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of the dominant ventricle with a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner. Global and regional strain (2D and 3D) of the dominant ventricle in both groups was assessed using CMR feature-tracking. Correlations between cardiac function and strain data were assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient values. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV) were determined to evaluate repeatability and agreement. RESULTS: The 2D GLS showed significant differences between the Fontan repair patients and volunteers (− 16.49 ± 5.00 vs. -19.49 ± 2.03; p = 0.002). The 2D GRS and 2D GCS showed no significant differences between two groups. 2D GRS: 38.96 ± 14.48 vs. 37.46 ± 7.77; 2D GCS: − 17.64 ± 5.00 vs. -16.89 ± 2.96, respectively; p > 0.05). The 3D global radial strain (GRS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) showed significant differences between the Fontan repair patients and volunteers (3D GRS: 36.35 ± 16.72 vs. 44.96 ± 9.98; 3D GLS: − 8.86 ± 6.84 vs. -13.67 ± 2.44; 3D GCS: − 13.70 ± 7.84 vs. -18.01 ± 1.78; p < 0.05, respectively). The ejection fraction (EF) and 3D GCS were significantly associated (r = − 0.491, p = 0.004). The 3D GCS showed correlations with the indexed end-diastolic volume (EDV) (r = 0.523, p = 0.002) and indexed end-systolic volume (ESV) (r = 0.602, p < 0.001). 3D strain showed good reproducibility, with GCS showing the best inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.87 and CoV = 5.15), followed by GLS (ICC = 0.84 and CoV = 5.36). CONCLUSIONS: 3D GCS is feasible, highly reproducible, and strongly correlated with conventional cardiac function measures. 3D GCS assessments may be useful for monitoring abnormal myocardial motion in patients with Fontan circulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6988298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69882982020-01-31 Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers Hu, Liwei Wang, Qian Gregory, Barton P. Ouyang, Rong Zhen Sun, Aimin Guo, Chen Han, Tongtong Zhong, Yumin BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: The accuracy of 2D and 3D strain analyses was evaluated by comparing strain and cardiac function parameters in Fontan repair patients and normal child volunteers. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 32 patients with Fontan circulation and 32 child volunteers who had undergone clinical cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of the dominant ventricle with a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner. Global and regional strain (2D and 3D) of the dominant ventricle in both groups was assessed using CMR feature-tracking. Correlations between cardiac function and strain data were assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient values. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV) were determined to evaluate repeatability and agreement. RESULTS: The 2D GLS showed significant differences between the Fontan repair patients and volunteers (− 16.49 ± 5.00 vs. -19.49 ± 2.03; p = 0.002). The 2D GRS and 2D GCS showed no significant differences between two groups. 2D GRS: 38.96 ± 14.48 vs. 37.46 ± 7.77; 2D GCS: − 17.64 ± 5.00 vs. -16.89 ± 2.96, respectively; p > 0.05). The 3D global radial strain (GRS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) showed significant differences between the Fontan repair patients and volunteers (3D GRS: 36.35 ± 16.72 vs. 44.96 ± 9.98; 3D GLS: − 8.86 ± 6.84 vs. -13.67 ± 2.44; 3D GCS: − 13.70 ± 7.84 vs. -18.01 ± 1.78; p < 0.05, respectively). The ejection fraction (EF) and 3D GCS were significantly associated (r = − 0.491, p = 0.004). The 3D GCS showed correlations with the indexed end-diastolic volume (EDV) (r = 0.523, p = 0.002) and indexed end-systolic volume (ESV) (r = 0.602, p < 0.001). 3D strain showed good reproducibility, with GCS showing the best inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.87 and CoV = 5.15), followed by GLS (ICC = 0.84 and CoV = 5.36). CONCLUSIONS: 3D GCS is feasible, highly reproducible, and strongly correlated with conventional cardiac function measures. 3D GCS assessments may be useful for monitoring abnormal myocardial motion in patients with Fontan circulation. BioMed Central 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6988298/ /pubmed/31992224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-0413-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hu, Liwei
Wang, Qian
Gregory, Barton P.
Ouyang, Rong Zhen
Sun, Aimin
Guo, Chen
Han, Tongtong
Zhong, Yumin
Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers
title Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers
title_full Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers
title_fullStr Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers
title_short Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers
title_sort quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using mri feature tracking in repair fontan patients and normal child volunteers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31992224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-0413-6
work_keys_str_mv AT huliwei quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers
AT wangqian quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers
AT gregorybartonp quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers
AT ouyangrongzhen quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers
AT sunaimin quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers
AT guochen quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers
AT hantongtong quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers
AT zhongyumin quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers