Cargando…
Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers
BACKGROUND: The accuracy of 2D and 3D strain analyses was evaluated by comparing strain and cardiac function parameters in Fontan repair patients and normal child volunteers. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 32 patients with Fontan circulation and 32 child volunteers who had undergone clinical c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31992224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-0413-6 |
_version_ | 1783492239594356736 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Liwei Wang, Qian Gregory, Barton P. Ouyang, Rong Zhen Sun, Aimin Guo, Chen Han, Tongtong Zhong, Yumin |
author_facet | Hu, Liwei Wang, Qian Gregory, Barton P. Ouyang, Rong Zhen Sun, Aimin Guo, Chen Han, Tongtong Zhong, Yumin |
author_sort | Hu, Liwei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The accuracy of 2D and 3D strain analyses was evaluated by comparing strain and cardiac function parameters in Fontan repair patients and normal child volunteers. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 32 patients with Fontan circulation and 32 child volunteers who had undergone clinical cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of the dominant ventricle with a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner. Global and regional strain (2D and 3D) of the dominant ventricle in both groups was assessed using CMR feature-tracking. Correlations between cardiac function and strain data were assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient values. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV) were determined to evaluate repeatability and agreement. RESULTS: The 2D GLS showed significant differences between the Fontan repair patients and volunteers (− 16.49 ± 5.00 vs. -19.49 ± 2.03; p = 0.002). The 2D GRS and 2D GCS showed no significant differences between two groups. 2D GRS: 38.96 ± 14.48 vs. 37.46 ± 7.77; 2D GCS: − 17.64 ± 5.00 vs. -16.89 ± 2.96, respectively; p > 0.05). The 3D global radial strain (GRS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) showed significant differences between the Fontan repair patients and volunteers (3D GRS: 36.35 ± 16.72 vs. 44.96 ± 9.98; 3D GLS: − 8.86 ± 6.84 vs. -13.67 ± 2.44; 3D GCS: − 13.70 ± 7.84 vs. -18.01 ± 1.78; p < 0.05, respectively). The ejection fraction (EF) and 3D GCS were significantly associated (r = − 0.491, p = 0.004). The 3D GCS showed correlations with the indexed end-diastolic volume (EDV) (r = 0.523, p = 0.002) and indexed end-systolic volume (ESV) (r = 0.602, p < 0.001). 3D strain showed good reproducibility, with GCS showing the best inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.87 and CoV = 5.15), followed by GLS (ICC = 0.84 and CoV = 5.36). CONCLUSIONS: 3D GCS is feasible, highly reproducible, and strongly correlated with conventional cardiac function measures. 3D GCS assessments may be useful for monitoring abnormal myocardial motion in patients with Fontan circulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6988298 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69882982020-01-31 Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers Hu, Liwei Wang, Qian Gregory, Barton P. Ouyang, Rong Zhen Sun, Aimin Guo, Chen Han, Tongtong Zhong, Yumin BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: The accuracy of 2D and 3D strain analyses was evaluated by comparing strain and cardiac function parameters in Fontan repair patients and normal child volunteers. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 32 patients with Fontan circulation and 32 child volunteers who had undergone clinical cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of the dominant ventricle with a 1.5-Tesla MRI scanner. Global and regional strain (2D and 3D) of the dominant ventricle in both groups was assessed using CMR feature-tracking. Correlations between cardiac function and strain data were assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient values. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CoV) were determined to evaluate repeatability and agreement. RESULTS: The 2D GLS showed significant differences between the Fontan repair patients and volunteers (− 16.49 ± 5.00 vs. -19.49 ± 2.03; p = 0.002). The 2D GRS and 2D GCS showed no significant differences between two groups. 2D GRS: 38.96 ± 14.48 vs. 37.46 ± 7.77; 2D GCS: − 17.64 ± 5.00 vs. -16.89 ± 2.96, respectively; p > 0.05). The 3D global radial strain (GRS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) showed significant differences between the Fontan repair patients and volunteers (3D GRS: 36.35 ± 16.72 vs. 44.96 ± 9.98; 3D GLS: − 8.86 ± 6.84 vs. -13.67 ± 2.44; 3D GCS: − 13.70 ± 7.84 vs. -18.01 ± 1.78; p < 0.05, respectively). The ejection fraction (EF) and 3D GCS were significantly associated (r = − 0.491, p = 0.004). The 3D GCS showed correlations with the indexed end-diastolic volume (EDV) (r = 0.523, p = 0.002) and indexed end-systolic volume (ESV) (r = 0.602, p < 0.001). 3D strain showed good reproducibility, with GCS showing the best inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.87 and CoV = 5.15), followed by GLS (ICC = 0.84 and CoV = 5.36). CONCLUSIONS: 3D GCS is feasible, highly reproducible, and strongly correlated with conventional cardiac function measures. 3D GCS assessments may be useful for monitoring abnormal myocardial motion in patients with Fontan circulation. BioMed Central 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6988298/ /pubmed/31992224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-0413-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hu, Liwei Wang, Qian Gregory, Barton P. Ouyang, Rong Zhen Sun, Aimin Guo, Chen Han, Tongtong Zhong, Yumin Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers |
title | Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers |
title_full | Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers |
title_fullStr | Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers |
title_short | Quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using MRI feature tracking in repair Fontan patients and normal child volunteers |
title_sort | quantitative comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional strain measurement using mri feature tracking in repair fontan patients and normal child volunteers |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31992224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-020-0413-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huliwei quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers AT wangqian quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers AT gregorybartonp quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers AT ouyangrongzhen quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers AT sunaimin quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers AT guochen quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers AT hantongtong quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers AT zhongyumin quantitativecomparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalstrainmeasurementusingmrifeaturetrackinginrepairfontanpatientsandnormalchildvolunteers |