Cargando…

A comparative study of mothers of infants hospitalized in an open ward neonatal intensive care unit and a combined pod and single-family room design

BACKGROUND: The well-being of mothers of infants requiring Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) hospitalization may be affected by the architectural design of the unit. A few recent studies suggest there may be some drawbacks of single-family rooms (SFRs) for infants and their mothers, such as isolat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feeley, Nancy, Robins, Stephanie, Genest, Christine, Stremler, Robyn, Zelkowitz, Phyllis, Charbonneau, Lyne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-1929-1
_version_ 1783492252993060864
author Feeley, Nancy
Robins, Stephanie
Genest, Christine
Stremler, Robyn
Zelkowitz, Phyllis
Charbonneau, Lyne
author_facet Feeley, Nancy
Robins, Stephanie
Genest, Christine
Stremler, Robyn
Zelkowitz, Phyllis
Charbonneau, Lyne
author_sort Feeley, Nancy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The well-being of mothers of infants requiring Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) hospitalization may be affected by the architectural design of the unit. A few recent studies suggest there may be some drawbacks of single-family rooms (SFRs) for infants and their mothers, such as isolation of mothers and reduced exposure to auditory stimulation for infants. PURPOSE: To compare NICU-stress, symptoms of depression, perceptions of nurse-parent support and family-centered care, sleep disturbances, breastfeeding self-efficacy and readiness for discharge in mothers of infants cared for in an open ward (OW) to those cared for in a unit that includes both pods and SFRs. METHODS: A pre-post quasi-experimental study was conducted in a Canadian level 3 unit before and after transitioning to a new unit of 6-bed pods and SFRs. OW data were collected in 2014 and pod/SFR data 1 year after the transition in 2017 to 2018. Mothers of infants hospitalized for at least 2 weeks completed questionnaires about stress, depressive symptoms, support, family-centered care, and sleep disturbances. In the week prior to discharge, they responded to breastfeeding self-efficacy and readiness for discharge questionnaires. They described their presence in the NICU at enrollment and again prior to discharge. RESULTS: Pod/SFR mothers reported significantly less NICU-stress compared to OW mothers. OW mothers had greater sights and sounds stress and felt more restricted in their parental role. Pod/SFR mothers reported greater respect from staff. Controlling for maternal education, pod/SFR mothers perceived their infant’s readiness for discharge to be greater than OW mothers. There were no significant differences between groups in depressive symptoms, nurse-parent support, sleep disturbances, and breastfeeding self-efficacy. At enrollment and again in the weeks preceding discharge, pod/SFR mothers were present significantly more hours per week than OW mothers, controlling for maternal education. CONCLUSIONS: Further study of small pods is indicated as these units may be less stressful for parents, and enhance family-centered care, as well as maternal presence, compared to OWs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6988355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69883552020-02-03 A comparative study of mothers of infants hospitalized in an open ward neonatal intensive care unit and a combined pod and single-family room design Feeley, Nancy Robins, Stephanie Genest, Christine Stremler, Robyn Zelkowitz, Phyllis Charbonneau, Lyne BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: The well-being of mothers of infants requiring Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) hospitalization may be affected by the architectural design of the unit. A few recent studies suggest there may be some drawbacks of single-family rooms (SFRs) for infants and their mothers, such as isolation of mothers and reduced exposure to auditory stimulation for infants. PURPOSE: To compare NICU-stress, symptoms of depression, perceptions of nurse-parent support and family-centered care, sleep disturbances, breastfeeding self-efficacy and readiness for discharge in mothers of infants cared for in an open ward (OW) to those cared for in a unit that includes both pods and SFRs. METHODS: A pre-post quasi-experimental study was conducted in a Canadian level 3 unit before and after transitioning to a new unit of 6-bed pods and SFRs. OW data were collected in 2014 and pod/SFR data 1 year after the transition in 2017 to 2018. Mothers of infants hospitalized for at least 2 weeks completed questionnaires about stress, depressive symptoms, support, family-centered care, and sleep disturbances. In the week prior to discharge, they responded to breastfeeding self-efficacy and readiness for discharge questionnaires. They described their presence in the NICU at enrollment and again prior to discharge. RESULTS: Pod/SFR mothers reported significantly less NICU-stress compared to OW mothers. OW mothers had greater sights and sounds stress and felt more restricted in their parental role. Pod/SFR mothers reported greater respect from staff. Controlling for maternal education, pod/SFR mothers perceived their infant’s readiness for discharge to be greater than OW mothers. There were no significant differences between groups in depressive symptoms, nurse-parent support, sleep disturbances, and breastfeeding self-efficacy. At enrollment and again in the weeks preceding discharge, pod/SFR mothers were present significantly more hours per week than OW mothers, controlling for maternal education. CONCLUSIONS: Further study of small pods is indicated as these units may be less stressful for parents, and enhance family-centered care, as well as maternal presence, compared to OWs. BioMed Central 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6988355/ /pubmed/31996178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-1929-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Feeley, Nancy
Robins, Stephanie
Genest, Christine
Stremler, Robyn
Zelkowitz, Phyllis
Charbonneau, Lyne
A comparative study of mothers of infants hospitalized in an open ward neonatal intensive care unit and a combined pod and single-family room design
title A comparative study of mothers of infants hospitalized in an open ward neonatal intensive care unit and a combined pod and single-family room design
title_full A comparative study of mothers of infants hospitalized in an open ward neonatal intensive care unit and a combined pod and single-family room design
title_fullStr A comparative study of mothers of infants hospitalized in an open ward neonatal intensive care unit and a combined pod and single-family room design
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of mothers of infants hospitalized in an open ward neonatal intensive care unit and a combined pod and single-family room design
title_short A comparative study of mothers of infants hospitalized in an open ward neonatal intensive care unit and a combined pod and single-family room design
title_sort comparative study of mothers of infants hospitalized in an open ward neonatal intensive care unit and a combined pod and single-family room design
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996178
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-1929-1
work_keys_str_mv AT feeleynancy acomparativestudyofmothersofinfantshospitalizedinanopenwardneonatalintensivecareunitandacombinedpodandsinglefamilyroomdesign
AT robinsstephanie acomparativestudyofmothersofinfantshospitalizedinanopenwardneonatalintensivecareunitandacombinedpodandsinglefamilyroomdesign
AT genestchristine acomparativestudyofmothersofinfantshospitalizedinanopenwardneonatalintensivecareunitandacombinedpodandsinglefamilyroomdesign
AT stremlerrobyn acomparativestudyofmothersofinfantshospitalizedinanopenwardneonatalintensivecareunitandacombinedpodandsinglefamilyroomdesign
AT zelkowitzphyllis acomparativestudyofmothersofinfantshospitalizedinanopenwardneonatalintensivecareunitandacombinedpodandsinglefamilyroomdesign
AT charbonneaulyne acomparativestudyofmothersofinfantshospitalizedinanopenwardneonatalintensivecareunitandacombinedpodandsinglefamilyroomdesign
AT feeleynancy comparativestudyofmothersofinfantshospitalizedinanopenwardneonatalintensivecareunitandacombinedpodandsinglefamilyroomdesign
AT robinsstephanie comparativestudyofmothersofinfantshospitalizedinanopenwardneonatalintensivecareunitandacombinedpodandsinglefamilyroomdesign
AT genestchristine comparativestudyofmothersofinfantshospitalizedinanopenwardneonatalintensivecareunitandacombinedpodandsinglefamilyroomdesign
AT stremlerrobyn comparativestudyofmothersofinfantshospitalizedinanopenwardneonatalintensivecareunitandacombinedpodandsinglefamilyroomdesign
AT zelkowitzphyllis comparativestudyofmothersofinfantshospitalizedinanopenwardneonatalintensivecareunitandacombinedpodandsinglefamilyroomdesign
AT charbonneaulyne comparativestudyofmothersofinfantshospitalizedinanopenwardneonatalintensivecareunitandacombinedpodandsinglefamilyroomdesign