Cargando…

Accuracy of in-utero MRI to detect fetal brain abnormalities and prognosticate developmental outcome: postnatal follow-up of the MERIDIAN cohort

BACKGROUND: In utero MRI (iuMRI) detects fetal brain abnormalities more accurately than ultrasonography and provides additional clinical information in around half of pregnancies. We aimed to study whether postnatal neuroimaging after age 6 months changes the diagnostic accuracy of iuMRI and its abi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hart, Anthony R, Embleton, Nicholas D, Bradburn, Michael, Connolly, Daniel J A, Mandefield, Laura, Mooney, Cara, Griffiths, Paul D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31786091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30349-9
_version_ 1783492264180318208
author Hart, Anthony R
Embleton, Nicholas D
Bradburn, Michael
Connolly, Daniel J A
Mandefield, Laura
Mooney, Cara
Griffiths, Paul D
author_facet Hart, Anthony R
Embleton, Nicholas D
Bradburn, Michael
Connolly, Daniel J A
Mandefield, Laura
Mooney, Cara
Griffiths, Paul D
author_sort Hart, Anthony R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In utero MRI (iuMRI) detects fetal brain abnormalities more accurately than ultrasonography and provides additional clinical information in around half of pregnancies. We aimed to study whether postnatal neuroimaging after age 6 months changes the diagnostic accuracy of iuMRI and its ability to predict developmental outcome. METHODS: Families enrolled in the MERIDIAN study whose child survived to age 3 years were invited to have a case note review and assessment of developmental outcome with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, or both. A paediatric neuroradiologist, masked to the iuMRI results, reviewed the postnatal neuroimaging if the clinical report differed from iuMRI findings. Diagnostic accuracy was recalculated. A paediatric neurologist and neonatologist categorised participants' development as normal, at risk, or abnormal, and the ability of iuMRI and ultrasonography to predict developmental outcome were assessed. FINDINGS: 210 participants had case note review, of whom 81 (39%) had additional investigations after age 6 months. The diagnostic accuracy of iuMRI remained higher than ultrasonography (proportion of correct cases was 529 [92%] of 574 vs 387 [67%] of 574; absolute difference 25%, 95% CI 21 to 29; p<0·0001). Developmental outcome data were analysed in 156 participants, and 111 (71%) were categorised as normal or at risk. Of these 111 participants, prognosis was normal or favourable for 56 (51%) using ultrasonography and for 76 (69%) using iuMRI (difference in specificity 18%, 95% CI 7 to 29; p=0·0008). No statistically significant difference was seen in infants with abnormal outcome (difference in sensitivity 4%, 95% CI −10 to 19; p=0·73). INTERPRETATION: iuMRI remains the optimal tool to identify fetal brain abnormalities. It is less accurate when used to predict developmental outcome, although better than ultrasonography for identifying children with normal outcome. Further work is needed to determine how the prognostic abilities of iuMRI can be improved. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6988445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69884452020-02-03 Accuracy of in-utero MRI to detect fetal brain abnormalities and prognosticate developmental outcome: postnatal follow-up of the MERIDIAN cohort Hart, Anthony R Embleton, Nicholas D Bradburn, Michael Connolly, Daniel J A Mandefield, Laura Mooney, Cara Griffiths, Paul D Lancet Child Adolesc Health Article BACKGROUND: In utero MRI (iuMRI) detects fetal brain abnormalities more accurately than ultrasonography and provides additional clinical information in around half of pregnancies. We aimed to study whether postnatal neuroimaging after age 6 months changes the diagnostic accuracy of iuMRI and its ability to predict developmental outcome. METHODS: Families enrolled in the MERIDIAN study whose child survived to age 3 years were invited to have a case note review and assessment of developmental outcome with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, or both. A paediatric neuroradiologist, masked to the iuMRI results, reviewed the postnatal neuroimaging if the clinical report differed from iuMRI findings. Diagnostic accuracy was recalculated. A paediatric neurologist and neonatologist categorised participants' development as normal, at risk, or abnormal, and the ability of iuMRI and ultrasonography to predict developmental outcome were assessed. FINDINGS: 210 participants had case note review, of whom 81 (39%) had additional investigations after age 6 months. The diagnostic accuracy of iuMRI remained higher than ultrasonography (proportion of correct cases was 529 [92%] of 574 vs 387 [67%] of 574; absolute difference 25%, 95% CI 21 to 29; p<0·0001). Developmental outcome data were analysed in 156 participants, and 111 (71%) were categorised as normal or at risk. Of these 111 participants, prognosis was normal or favourable for 56 (51%) using ultrasonography and for 76 (69%) using iuMRI (difference in specificity 18%, 95% CI 7 to 29; p=0·0008). No statistically significant difference was seen in infants with abnormal outcome (difference in sensitivity 4%, 95% CI −10 to 19; p=0·73). INTERPRETATION: iuMRI remains the optimal tool to identify fetal brain abnormalities. It is less accurate when used to predict developmental outcome, although better than ultrasonography for identifying children with normal outcome. Further work is needed to determine how the prognostic abilities of iuMRI can be improved. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme. Elsevier Ltd 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6988445/ /pubmed/31786091 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30349-9 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hart, Anthony R
Embleton, Nicholas D
Bradburn, Michael
Connolly, Daniel J A
Mandefield, Laura
Mooney, Cara
Griffiths, Paul D
Accuracy of in-utero MRI to detect fetal brain abnormalities and prognosticate developmental outcome: postnatal follow-up of the MERIDIAN cohort
title Accuracy of in-utero MRI to detect fetal brain abnormalities and prognosticate developmental outcome: postnatal follow-up of the MERIDIAN cohort
title_full Accuracy of in-utero MRI to detect fetal brain abnormalities and prognosticate developmental outcome: postnatal follow-up of the MERIDIAN cohort
title_fullStr Accuracy of in-utero MRI to detect fetal brain abnormalities and prognosticate developmental outcome: postnatal follow-up of the MERIDIAN cohort
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of in-utero MRI to detect fetal brain abnormalities and prognosticate developmental outcome: postnatal follow-up of the MERIDIAN cohort
title_short Accuracy of in-utero MRI to detect fetal brain abnormalities and prognosticate developmental outcome: postnatal follow-up of the MERIDIAN cohort
title_sort accuracy of in-utero mri to detect fetal brain abnormalities and prognosticate developmental outcome: postnatal follow-up of the meridian cohort
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31786091
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30349-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hartanthonyr accuracyofinuteromritodetectfetalbrainabnormalitiesandprognosticatedevelopmentaloutcomepostnatalfollowupofthemeridiancohort
AT embletonnicholasd accuracyofinuteromritodetectfetalbrainabnormalitiesandprognosticatedevelopmentaloutcomepostnatalfollowupofthemeridiancohort
AT bradburnmichael accuracyofinuteromritodetectfetalbrainabnormalitiesandprognosticatedevelopmentaloutcomepostnatalfollowupofthemeridiancohort
AT connollydanielja accuracyofinuteromritodetectfetalbrainabnormalitiesandprognosticatedevelopmentaloutcomepostnatalfollowupofthemeridiancohort
AT mandefieldlaura accuracyofinuteromritodetectfetalbrainabnormalitiesandprognosticatedevelopmentaloutcomepostnatalfollowupofthemeridiancohort
AT mooneycara accuracyofinuteromritodetectfetalbrainabnormalitiesandprognosticatedevelopmentaloutcomepostnatalfollowupofthemeridiancohort
AT griffithspauld accuracyofinuteromritodetectfetalbrainabnormalitiesandprognosticatedevelopmentaloutcomepostnatalfollowupofthemeridiancohort