Cargando…

Long‐term safety and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled‐release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: A large‐scale, double‐blind trial (SP0993; NCT01243177) demonstrated that lacosamide was noninferior to controlled‐release carbamazepine (carbamazepine‐CR) in terms of efficacy, and well tolerated as first‐line monotherapy in patients (≥16 years of age) with newly diagnosed epilepsy. We r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ben‐Menachem, Elinor, Grebe, Hans Peter, Terada, Kiyohito, Jensen, Lori, Li, Ting, De Backer, Marc, Steiniger‐Brach, Björn, Gasalla, Teresa, Brock, Melissa, Biton, Victor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31755090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.16381
_version_ 1783492278734553088
author Ben‐Menachem, Elinor
Grebe, Hans Peter
Terada, Kiyohito
Jensen, Lori
Li, Ting
De Backer, Marc
Steiniger‐Brach, Björn
Gasalla, Teresa
Brock, Melissa
Biton, Victor
author_facet Ben‐Menachem, Elinor
Grebe, Hans Peter
Terada, Kiyohito
Jensen, Lori
Li, Ting
De Backer, Marc
Steiniger‐Brach, Björn
Gasalla, Teresa
Brock, Melissa
Biton, Victor
author_sort Ben‐Menachem, Elinor
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: A large‐scale, double‐blind trial (SP0993; NCT01243177) demonstrated that lacosamide was noninferior to controlled‐release carbamazepine (carbamazepine‐CR) in terms of efficacy, and well tolerated as first‐line monotherapy in patients (≥16 years of age) with newly diagnosed epilepsy. We report primary safety outcomes from the double‐blind extension of the noninferiority trial (SP0994; NCT01465997) and post hoc analyses of pooled long‐term safety and efficacy data from both trials. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to lacosamide or carbamazepine‐CR. Doses were escalated (lacosamide: 200/400/600 mg/d; carbamazepine‐CR: 400/800/1200 mg/d) based on seizure control. Eligible patients continued randomized treatment in the extension. Primary outcomes of the extension were treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and discontinuations due to TEAEs. Post hoc analyses of data from combined trials included 12‐ and 24‐month seizure freedom and TEAEs by number of comorbid conditions. RESULTS: A total of 886 patients were treated in the initial trial and 548 in the extension; 211 of 279 patients (75.6%) on lacosamide and 180/269 (66.9%) on carbamazepine‐CR completed the extension. In the extension, 181 patients (64.9%) on lacosamide and 182 (67.7%) on carbamazepine‐CR reported TEAEs; in both groups, nasopharyngitis, headache, and dizziness were most common. Serious TEAEs were reported by 32 patients (11.5%) on lacosamide and 22 (8.2%) on carbamazepine‐CR; 12 (4.3%) and 21 (7.8%) discontinued due to TEAEs. In the combined trials (median exposure: lacosamide 630 days; carbamazepine‐CR 589 days), Kaplan‐Meier estimated proportions of patients with 12‐ and 24‐month seizure freedom from first dose were 50.8% (95% confidence interval 46.2%‐55.4%) and 47.0% (42.2%‐51.7%) on lacosamide, and 54.9% (50.3%‐59.6%) and 50.9% (46.0%‐55.7%) on carbamazepine‐CR. Incidences of drug‐related TEAEs and discontinuations due to TEAEs increased by number of comorbid conditions and were lower in patients on lacosamide. SIGNIFICANCE: Long‐term (median ~2 years) lacosamide monotherapy was efficacious and generally well tolerated in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Seizure freedom rates were similar with lacosamide and carbamazepine‐CR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6988520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69885202020-02-03 Long‐term safety and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled‐release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy Ben‐Menachem, Elinor Grebe, Hans Peter Terada, Kiyohito Jensen, Lori Li, Ting De Backer, Marc Steiniger‐Brach, Björn Gasalla, Teresa Brock, Melissa Biton, Victor Epilepsia Full‐length Original Research OBJECTIVE: A large‐scale, double‐blind trial (SP0993; NCT01243177) demonstrated that lacosamide was noninferior to controlled‐release carbamazepine (carbamazepine‐CR) in terms of efficacy, and well tolerated as first‐line monotherapy in patients (≥16 years of age) with newly diagnosed epilepsy. We report primary safety outcomes from the double‐blind extension of the noninferiority trial (SP0994; NCT01465997) and post hoc analyses of pooled long‐term safety and efficacy data from both trials. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to lacosamide or carbamazepine‐CR. Doses were escalated (lacosamide: 200/400/600 mg/d; carbamazepine‐CR: 400/800/1200 mg/d) based on seizure control. Eligible patients continued randomized treatment in the extension. Primary outcomes of the extension were treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and discontinuations due to TEAEs. Post hoc analyses of data from combined trials included 12‐ and 24‐month seizure freedom and TEAEs by number of comorbid conditions. RESULTS: A total of 886 patients were treated in the initial trial and 548 in the extension; 211 of 279 patients (75.6%) on lacosamide and 180/269 (66.9%) on carbamazepine‐CR completed the extension. In the extension, 181 patients (64.9%) on lacosamide and 182 (67.7%) on carbamazepine‐CR reported TEAEs; in both groups, nasopharyngitis, headache, and dizziness were most common. Serious TEAEs were reported by 32 patients (11.5%) on lacosamide and 22 (8.2%) on carbamazepine‐CR; 12 (4.3%) and 21 (7.8%) discontinued due to TEAEs. In the combined trials (median exposure: lacosamide 630 days; carbamazepine‐CR 589 days), Kaplan‐Meier estimated proportions of patients with 12‐ and 24‐month seizure freedom from first dose were 50.8% (95% confidence interval 46.2%‐55.4%) and 47.0% (42.2%‐51.7%) on lacosamide, and 54.9% (50.3%‐59.6%) and 50.9% (46.0%‐55.7%) on carbamazepine‐CR. Incidences of drug‐related TEAEs and discontinuations due to TEAEs increased by number of comorbid conditions and were lower in patients on lacosamide. SIGNIFICANCE: Long‐term (median ~2 years) lacosamide monotherapy was efficacious and generally well tolerated in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Seizure freedom rates were similar with lacosamide and carbamazepine‐CR. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-21 2019-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6988520/ /pubmed/31755090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.16381 Text en © 2019 UCB Biopharma SPRL. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Full‐length Original Research
Ben‐Menachem, Elinor
Grebe, Hans Peter
Terada, Kiyohito
Jensen, Lori
Li, Ting
De Backer, Marc
Steiniger‐Brach, Björn
Gasalla, Teresa
Brock, Melissa
Biton, Victor
Long‐term safety and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled‐release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy
title Long‐term safety and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled‐release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy
title_full Long‐term safety and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled‐release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy
title_fullStr Long‐term safety and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled‐release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy
title_full_unstemmed Long‐term safety and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled‐release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy
title_short Long‐term safety and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled‐release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy
title_sort long‐term safety and efficacy of lacosamide and controlled‐release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy
topic Full‐length Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31755090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.16381
work_keys_str_mv AT benmenachemelinor longtermsafetyandefficacyoflacosamideandcontrolledreleasecarbamazepinemonotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsy
AT grebehanspeter longtermsafetyandefficacyoflacosamideandcontrolledreleasecarbamazepinemonotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsy
AT teradakiyohito longtermsafetyandefficacyoflacosamideandcontrolledreleasecarbamazepinemonotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsy
AT jensenlori longtermsafetyandefficacyoflacosamideandcontrolledreleasecarbamazepinemonotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsy
AT liting longtermsafetyandefficacyoflacosamideandcontrolledreleasecarbamazepinemonotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsy
AT debackermarc longtermsafetyandefficacyoflacosamideandcontrolledreleasecarbamazepinemonotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsy
AT steinigerbrachbjorn longtermsafetyandefficacyoflacosamideandcontrolledreleasecarbamazepinemonotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsy
AT gasallateresa longtermsafetyandefficacyoflacosamideandcontrolledreleasecarbamazepinemonotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsy
AT brockmelissa longtermsafetyandefficacyoflacosamideandcontrolledreleasecarbamazepinemonotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsy
AT bitonvictor longtermsafetyandefficacyoflacosamideandcontrolledreleasecarbamazepinemonotherapyinpatientswithnewlydiagnosedepilepsy