Cargando…

Do more intelligent brains retain heightened plasticity for longer in development? A computational investigation

Twin studies indicate that the heritability of general cognitive ability – the genetic contribution to individual differences – increases with age. Brant et al. (2013) reported that this increase in heritability occurs earlier in development for low ability children than high ability children. Allie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Thomas, Michael S.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27261925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.04.002
_version_ 1783492293325488128
author Thomas, Michael S.C.
author_facet Thomas, Michael S.C.
author_sort Thomas, Michael S.C.
collection PubMed
description Twin studies indicate that the heritability of general cognitive ability – the genetic contribution to individual differences – increases with age. Brant et al. (2013) reported that this increase in heritability occurs earlier in development for low ability children than high ability children. Allied with structural brain imaging results that indicate faster thickening and thinning of cortex for high ability children (Shaw et al., 2006), Brant and colleagues argued higher cognitive ability represents an extended sensitive period for brain development. However, they admitted no coherent mechanistic account can currently reconcile the key empirical data. Here, computational methods are employed to demonstrate the empirical data can be reconciled without recourse to variations in sensitive periods. These methods utilized population-based artificial neural network models of cognitive development. In the model, ability-related variations stemmed from the timing of the increases in the non-linearity of computational processes, causing dizygotic twins to diverge in their behavior. These occurred in a population where: (a) ability was determined by the combined small contributions of many neurocomputational factors, and (b) individual differences in ability were largely genetically constrained. The model’s explanation of developmental increases in heritability contrasts with proposals that these increases represent emerging gene-environment correlations (Haworth et al., 2010). The article advocates simulating inherited individual differences within an explicitly developmental framework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6988599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69885992020-02-03 Do more intelligent brains retain heightened plasticity for longer in development? A computational investigation Thomas, Michael S.C. Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research Twin studies indicate that the heritability of general cognitive ability – the genetic contribution to individual differences – increases with age. Brant et al. (2013) reported that this increase in heritability occurs earlier in development for low ability children than high ability children. Allied with structural brain imaging results that indicate faster thickening and thinning of cortex for high ability children (Shaw et al., 2006), Brant and colleagues argued higher cognitive ability represents an extended sensitive period for brain development. However, they admitted no coherent mechanistic account can currently reconcile the key empirical data. Here, computational methods are employed to demonstrate the empirical data can be reconciled without recourse to variations in sensitive periods. These methods utilized population-based artificial neural network models of cognitive development. In the model, ability-related variations stemmed from the timing of the increases in the non-linearity of computational processes, causing dizygotic twins to diverge in their behavior. These occurred in a population where: (a) ability was determined by the combined small contributions of many neurocomputational factors, and (b) individual differences in ability were largely genetically constrained. The model’s explanation of developmental increases in heritability contrasts with proposals that these increases represent emerging gene-environment correlations (Haworth et al., 2010). The article advocates simulating inherited individual differences within an explicitly developmental framework. Elsevier 2016-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6988599/ /pubmed/27261925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.04.002 Text en © 2016 The Author http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Thomas, Michael S.C.
Do more intelligent brains retain heightened plasticity for longer in development? A computational investigation
title Do more intelligent brains retain heightened plasticity for longer in development? A computational investigation
title_full Do more intelligent brains retain heightened plasticity for longer in development? A computational investigation
title_fullStr Do more intelligent brains retain heightened plasticity for longer in development? A computational investigation
title_full_unstemmed Do more intelligent brains retain heightened plasticity for longer in development? A computational investigation
title_short Do more intelligent brains retain heightened plasticity for longer in development? A computational investigation
title_sort do more intelligent brains retain heightened plasticity for longer in development? a computational investigation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27261925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2016.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasmichaelsc domoreintelligentbrainsretainheightenedplasticityforlongerindevelopmentacomputationalinvestigation