Cargando…

Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Commercially Available Kit for Chairside Cariogenic Bacteria Test – Caries Risk Test, Saliva-check Mutans and CariScreen

Background and objectives The presence of mutans streptococci has been used in individual assessments of caries risk. In the modern era of dentistry, the chair side kits for assessing chair side cariogenic bacteria play a significant role. There is paucity of literature about the comparison of comme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babu, Vidya, Hegde, Sundeep, Bhat, Sham, Sargod, Sharan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025425
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6504
_version_ 1783492303661301760
author Babu, Vidya
Hegde, Sundeep
Bhat, Sham
Sargod, Sharan
author_facet Babu, Vidya
Hegde, Sundeep
Bhat, Sham
Sargod, Sharan
author_sort Babu, Vidya
collection PubMed
description Background and objectives The presence of mutans streptococci has been used in individual assessments of caries risk. In the modern era of dentistry, the chair side kits for assessing chair side cariogenic bacteria play a significant role. There is paucity of literature about the comparison of commercially available chair side caries risk tests. Hence this study was conducted to compare the efficacy of three commercially available chair side cariogenic bacteria tests. Methodology Twenty-five patients in the age group of 5-14 years were selected. The saliva samples of patients were collected and were taken for cariogenic bacteria tests using caries risk test (CRT) bacteria test kit and saliva check mutans kit (mutans rapid detection kit). The plaque samples were taken for CariScreen caries susceptibility testing meter. All the samples were compared with a gold standard, i.e., mitis salivarius-bacitracin (MSB) agar plate test. Results Results demonstrated that the specificity of CariScreen and caries risk test was 91.67 whereas it was 75.00 for saliva check mutans. The CariScreen produced the risk status of the patient in shortest time. However, all the chair side kits failed to show the exact colony count of bacteria. Conclusion The result of the current study proved that both CariScreen and caries risk test are highly efficient in assessing the caries risk of patients. However, the CariScreen is easy to perform and provides the result in shorter time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6988725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69887252020-02-05 Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Commercially Available Kit for Chairside Cariogenic Bacteria Test – Caries Risk Test, Saliva-check Mutans and CariScreen Babu, Vidya Hegde, Sundeep Bhat, Sham Sargod, Sharan Cureus Dentistry Background and objectives The presence of mutans streptococci has been used in individual assessments of caries risk. In the modern era of dentistry, the chair side kits for assessing chair side cariogenic bacteria play a significant role. There is paucity of literature about the comparison of commercially available chair side caries risk tests. Hence this study was conducted to compare the efficacy of three commercially available chair side cariogenic bacteria tests. Methodology Twenty-five patients in the age group of 5-14 years were selected. The saliva samples of patients were collected and were taken for cariogenic bacteria tests using caries risk test (CRT) bacteria test kit and saliva check mutans kit (mutans rapid detection kit). The plaque samples were taken for CariScreen caries susceptibility testing meter. All the samples were compared with a gold standard, i.e., mitis salivarius-bacitracin (MSB) agar plate test. Results Results demonstrated that the specificity of CariScreen and caries risk test was 91.67 whereas it was 75.00 for saliva check mutans. The CariScreen produced the risk status of the patient in shortest time. However, all the chair side kits failed to show the exact colony count of bacteria. Conclusion The result of the current study proved that both CariScreen and caries risk test are highly efficient in assessing the caries risk of patients. However, the CariScreen is easy to perform and provides the result in shorter time. Cureus 2019-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6988725/ /pubmed/32025425 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6504 Text en Copyright © 2019, Babu et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Dentistry
Babu, Vidya
Hegde, Sundeep
Bhat, Sham
Sargod, Sharan
Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Commercially Available Kit for Chairside Cariogenic Bacteria Test – Caries Risk Test, Saliva-check Mutans and CariScreen
title Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Commercially Available Kit for Chairside Cariogenic Bacteria Test – Caries Risk Test, Saliva-check Mutans and CariScreen
title_full Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Commercially Available Kit for Chairside Cariogenic Bacteria Test – Caries Risk Test, Saliva-check Mutans and CariScreen
title_fullStr Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Commercially Available Kit for Chairside Cariogenic Bacteria Test – Caries Risk Test, Saliva-check Mutans and CariScreen
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Commercially Available Kit for Chairside Cariogenic Bacteria Test – Caries Risk Test, Saliva-check Mutans and CariScreen
title_short Evaluation of Efficacy of Three Different Commercially Available Kit for Chairside Cariogenic Bacteria Test – Caries Risk Test, Saliva-check Mutans and CariScreen
title_sort evaluation of efficacy of three different commercially available kit for chairside cariogenic bacteria test – caries risk test, saliva-check mutans and cariscreen
topic Dentistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32025425
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6504
work_keys_str_mv AT babuvidya evaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentcommerciallyavailablekitforchairsidecariogenicbacteriatestcariesrisktestsalivacheckmutansandcariscreen
AT hegdesundeep evaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentcommerciallyavailablekitforchairsidecariogenicbacteriatestcariesrisktestsalivacheckmutansandcariscreen
AT bhatsham evaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentcommerciallyavailablekitforchairsidecariogenicbacteriatestcariesrisktestsalivacheckmutansandcariscreen
AT sargodsharan evaluationofefficacyofthreedifferentcommerciallyavailablekitforchairsidecariogenicbacteriatestcariesrisktestsalivacheckmutansandcariscreen