Cargando…
Action Observation and Effector Independency
The finding of reasonably consistent spatial and temporal productions of actions across different body parts has been used to argue in favor of the existence of a high-order representation of motor programs. In these terms, a generalized motor program consists of an abstract memory structure apt to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32038195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00416 |
_version_ | 1783492315412692992 |
---|---|
author | Betti, Sonia Deceuninck, Marie Sartori, Luisa Castiello, Umberto |
author_facet | Betti, Sonia Deceuninck, Marie Sartori, Luisa Castiello, Umberto |
author_sort | Betti, Sonia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The finding of reasonably consistent spatial and temporal productions of actions across different body parts has been used to argue in favor of the existence of a high-order representation of motor programs. In these terms, a generalized motor program consists of an abstract memory structure apt to specify a class of non-specific instructions used to guide a broad range of movements (e.g., “grasp,” “bite”). Although a number of studies, using a variety of tasks, have assessed the issue of effector independence in terms of action execution, little is known regarding the issue of effector independence within an action observation context. Here corticospinal excitability (CSE) of the right hand’s first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles was assessed by means of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (spTMS) during observation of a grasping action performed by the hand, the foot, the mouth, the elbow, or the knee. The results indicate that observing a grasping action performed with different body parts activates the effector typically adopted to execute that action, i.e., the hand. We contend that, as far as grasping is concerned, motor activations by action observation are evident in the muscles typically used to perform the observed action, even when the action is executed with another effector. Nevertheless, some exceptions call for a deeper analysis of motor coding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6988794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69887942020-02-07 Action Observation and Effector Independency Betti, Sonia Deceuninck, Marie Sartori, Luisa Castiello, Umberto Front Hum Neurosci Human Neuroscience The finding of reasonably consistent spatial and temporal productions of actions across different body parts has been used to argue in favor of the existence of a high-order representation of motor programs. In these terms, a generalized motor program consists of an abstract memory structure apt to specify a class of non-specific instructions used to guide a broad range of movements (e.g., “grasp,” “bite”). Although a number of studies, using a variety of tasks, have assessed the issue of effector independence in terms of action execution, little is known regarding the issue of effector independence within an action observation context. Here corticospinal excitability (CSE) of the right hand’s first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles was assessed by means of single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (spTMS) during observation of a grasping action performed by the hand, the foot, the mouth, the elbow, or the knee. The results indicate that observing a grasping action performed with different body parts activates the effector typically adopted to execute that action, i.e., the hand. We contend that, as far as grasping is concerned, motor activations by action observation are evident in the muscles typically used to perform the observed action, even when the action is executed with another effector. Nevertheless, some exceptions call for a deeper analysis of motor coding. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6988794/ /pubmed/32038195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00416 Text en Copyright © 2019 Betti, Deceuninck, Sartori and Castiello. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Human Neuroscience Betti, Sonia Deceuninck, Marie Sartori, Luisa Castiello, Umberto Action Observation and Effector Independency |
title | Action Observation and Effector Independency |
title_full | Action Observation and Effector Independency |
title_fullStr | Action Observation and Effector Independency |
title_full_unstemmed | Action Observation and Effector Independency |
title_short | Action Observation and Effector Independency |
title_sort | action observation and effector independency |
topic | Human Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32038195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00416 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bettisonia actionobservationandeffectorindependency AT deceuninckmarie actionobservationandeffectorindependency AT sartoriluisa actionobservationandeffectorindependency AT castielloumberto actionobservationandeffectorindependency |