Cargando…

Making consultation meaningful: Insights from a case study of the South African mental health policy consultation process

BACKGROUND: It is widely recognised that mental health policies should be developed in consultation with those tasked with their implementation and the users affected by them. In the South African legislative context public participation in policymaking is assumed, with little guidance on how to con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marais, Debra Leigh, Quayle, Michael, Petersen, Inge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31995612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228281
_version_ 1783492338381750272
author Marais, Debra Leigh
Quayle, Michael
Petersen, Inge
author_facet Marais, Debra Leigh
Quayle, Michael
Petersen, Inge
author_sort Marais, Debra Leigh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is widely recognised that mental health policies should be developed in consultation with those tasked with their implementation and the users affected by them. In the South African legislative context public participation in policymaking is assumed, with little guidance on how to conduct consultation processes, nor how to use consultation inputs in policy decisions. METHODS: The South African Mental Health Policy Framework and Strategic Plan was adopted in 2013 after an extensive consultation process. Focussing on the 2012 provincial and national consultation summit, this case-study conducted key informant interviews and undertook documentary analysis to explore the process through which consultation inputs were–or were not–transferred to inform this policy. Between 2013 and 2016 seven interviews were conducted, and 11 documents (policy drafts and summit outputs) and transcripts of 23 audio-recorded sessions from the national summit were analysed. RESULTS: Findings revealed that no substantive changes were made to the mental health policy following the consultation summits. There do not seem to have been systematic processes for facilitating and capturing knowledge inputs, or for transferring these inputs between provincial and national levels. There was also no further consultation regarding priorities identified for implementation prior to finalisation of the policy, with participants highlighting concerns about policy implementation at local levels as a result. This represents a lost opportunity for greater involvement of service users in policy development. CONCLUSIONS: Together with poor service-user representation, the format of the consultation process limited participant interaction and the possibility for engagement with, or uptake of, more experiential forms of knowledge. Several procedural elements were found to limit the elicitation and transference of consultation contributions for uptake into policy. Recommendations for future policy consultations include adapting the format of participatory processes to enable optimal use of participant knowledge, as well as greater service-user participation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6988953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69889532020-02-04 Making consultation meaningful: Insights from a case study of the South African mental health policy consultation process Marais, Debra Leigh Quayle, Michael Petersen, Inge PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: It is widely recognised that mental health policies should be developed in consultation with those tasked with their implementation and the users affected by them. In the South African legislative context public participation in policymaking is assumed, with little guidance on how to conduct consultation processes, nor how to use consultation inputs in policy decisions. METHODS: The South African Mental Health Policy Framework and Strategic Plan was adopted in 2013 after an extensive consultation process. Focussing on the 2012 provincial and national consultation summit, this case-study conducted key informant interviews and undertook documentary analysis to explore the process through which consultation inputs were–or were not–transferred to inform this policy. Between 2013 and 2016 seven interviews were conducted, and 11 documents (policy drafts and summit outputs) and transcripts of 23 audio-recorded sessions from the national summit were analysed. RESULTS: Findings revealed that no substantive changes were made to the mental health policy following the consultation summits. There do not seem to have been systematic processes for facilitating and capturing knowledge inputs, or for transferring these inputs between provincial and national levels. There was also no further consultation regarding priorities identified for implementation prior to finalisation of the policy, with participants highlighting concerns about policy implementation at local levels as a result. This represents a lost opportunity for greater involvement of service users in policy development. CONCLUSIONS: Together with poor service-user representation, the format of the consultation process limited participant interaction and the possibility for engagement with, or uptake of, more experiential forms of knowledge. Several procedural elements were found to limit the elicitation and transference of consultation contributions for uptake into policy. Recommendations for future policy consultations include adapting the format of participatory processes to enable optimal use of participant knowledge, as well as greater service-user participation. Public Library of Science 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6988953/ /pubmed/31995612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228281 Text en © 2020 Marais et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marais, Debra Leigh
Quayle, Michael
Petersen, Inge
Making consultation meaningful: Insights from a case study of the South African mental health policy consultation process
title Making consultation meaningful: Insights from a case study of the South African mental health policy consultation process
title_full Making consultation meaningful: Insights from a case study of the South African mental health policy consultation process
title_fullStr Making consultation meaningful: Insights from a case study of the South African mental health policy consultation process
title_full_unstemmed Making consultation meaningful: Insights from a case study of the South African mental health policy consultation process
title_short Making consultation meaningful: Insights from a case study of the South African mental health policy consultation process
title_sort making consultation meaningful: insights from a case study of the south african mental health policy consultation process
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6988953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31995612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228281
work_keys_str_mv AT maraisdebraleigh makingconsultationmeaningfulinsightsfromacasestudyofthesouthafricanmentalhealthpolicyconsultationprocess
AT quaylemichael makingconsultationmeaningfulinsightsfromacasestudyofthesouthafricanmentalhealthpolicyconsultationprocess
AT peterseninge makingconsultationmeaningfulinsightsfromacasestudyofthesouthafricanmentalhealthpolicyconsultationprocess