Cargando…

Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study

Infectious vaginitis due to bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and Trichomonas vaginalis accounts for a significant proportion of all gynecologic visits in the United States. A prospective multicenter clinical study was conducted to validate the performance of two new in vitro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwebke, Jane R., Taylor, Stephanie N., Ackerman, Ronald, Schlaberg, Robert, Quigley, Neil B., Gaydos, Charlotte A., Chavoustie, Steven E., Nyirjesy, Paul, Remillard, Carmelle V., Estes, Philip, McKinney, Byron, Getman, Damon K., Clark, Craig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31748322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01643-19
_version_ 1783492348357902336
author Schwebke, Jane R.
Taylor, Stephanie N.
Ackerman, Ronald
Schlaberg, Robert
Quigley, Neil B.
Gaydos, Charlotte A.
Chavoustie, Steven E.
Nyirjesy, Paul
Remillard, Carmelle V.
Estes, Philip
McKinney, Byron
Getman, Damon K.
Clark, Craig
author_facet Schwebke, Jane R.
Taylor, Stephanie N.
Ackerman, Ronald
Schlaberg, Robert
Quigley, Neil B.
Gaydos, Charlotte A.
Chavoustie, Steven E.
Nyirjesy, Paul
Remillard, Carmelle V.
Estes, Philip
McKinney, Byron
Getman, Damon K.
Clark, Craig
author_sort Schwebke, Jane R.
collection PubMed
description Infectious vaginitis due to bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and Trichomonas vaginalis accounts for a significant proportion of all gynecologic visits in the United States. A prospective multicenter clinical study was conducted to validate the performance of two new in vitro diagnostic transcription-mediated amplification nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for diagnosis of BV, VVC, and trichomoniasis. Patient- and clinician-collected vaginal-swab samples obtained from women with symptoms of vaginitis were tested with the Aptima BV and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas vaginitis (CV/TV) assays. The results were compared to Nugent (plus Amsel for intermediate Nugent) scores for BV, Candida cultures and DNA sequencing for VVC, and a composite of NAAT and culture for T. vaginalis. The prevalences of infection were similar for clinician- and patient-collected samples: 49% for BV, 29% for VVC due to the Candida species group, 4% for VVC due to Candida glabrata, and 10% for T. vaginalis. Sensitivity and specificity estimates for the investigational tests in clinician-collected samples were 95.0% and 89.6%, respectively, for BV; 91.7% and 94.9% for the Candida species group; 84.7% and 99.1% for C. glabrata; and 96.5% and 95.1% for T. vaginalis. Sensitivities and specificities were similar in patient-collected samples. In a secondary analysis, clinicians’ diagnoses, in-clinic assessments, and investigational-assay results were compared to gold standard reference methods. Overall, the investigational assays had higher sensitivity and specificity than clinicians’ diagnoses and in-clinic assessments, indicating that the investigational assays were more predictive of infection than traditional diagnostic methods. These results provide clinical-efficacy evidence for two in vitro diagnostic NAATs that can detect the main causes of vaginitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6989072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69890722020-02-11 Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study Schwebke, Jane R. Taylor, Stephanie N. Ackerman, Ronald Schlaberg, Robert Quigley, Neil B. Gaydos, Charlotte A. Chavoustie, Steven E. Nyirjesy, Paul Remillard, Carmelle V. Estes, Philip McKinney, Byron Getman, Damon K. Clark, Craig J Clin Microbiol Bacteriology Infectious vaginitis due to bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and Trichomonas vaginalis accounts for a significant proportion of all gynecologic visits in the United States. A prospective multicenter clinical study was conducted to validate the performance of two new in vitro diagnostic transcription-mediated amplification nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for diagnosis of BV, VVC, and trichomoniasis. Patient- and clinician-collected vaginal-swab samples obtained from women with symptoms of vaginitis were tested with the Aptima BV and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas vaginitis (CV/TV) assays. The results were compared to Nugent (plus Amsel for intermediate Nugent) scores for BV, Candida cultures and DNA sequencing for VVC, and a composite of NAAT and culture for T. vaginalis. The prevalences of infection were similar for clinician- and patient-collected samples: 49% for BV, 29% for VVC due to the Candida species group, 4% for VVC due to Candida glabrata, and 10% for T. vaginalis. Sensitivity and specificity estimates for the investigational tests in clinician-collected samples were 95.0% and 89.6%, respectively, for BV; 91.7% and 94.9% for the Candida species group; 84.7% and 99.1% for C. glabrata; and 96.5% and 95.1% for T. vaginalis. Sensitivities and specificities were similar in patient-collected samples. In a secondary analysis, clinicians’ diagnoses, in-clinic assessments, and investigational-assay results were compared to gold standard reference methods. Overall, the investigational assays had higher sensitivity and specificity than clinicians’ diagnoses and in-clinic assessments, indicating that the investigational assays were more predictive of infection than traditional diagnostic methods. These results provide clinical-efficacy evidence for two in vitro diagnostic NAATs that can detect the main causes of vaginitis. American Society for Microbiology 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6989072/ /pubmed/31748322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01643-19 Text en Copyright © 2020 Schwebke et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Bacteriology
Schwebke, Jane R.
Taylor, Stephanie N.
Ackerman, Ronald
Schlaberg, Robert
Quigley, Neil B.
Gaydos, Charlotte A.
Chavoustie, Steven E.
Nyirjesy, Paul
Remillard, Carmelle V.
Estes, Philip
McKinney, Byron
Getman, Damon K.
Clark, Craig
Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study
title Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study
title_full Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study
title_fullStr Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study
title_short Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study
title_sort clinical validation of the aptima bacterial vaginosis and aptima candida/trichomonas vaginitis assays: results from a prospective multicenter clinical study
topic Bacteriology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31748322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01643-19
work_keys_str_mv AT schwebkejaner clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT taylorstephanien clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT ackermanronald clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT schlabergrobert clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT quigleyneilb clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT gaydoscharlottea clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT chavoustiestevene clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT nyirjesypaul clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT remillardcarmellev clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT estesphilip clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT mckinneybyron clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT getmandamonk clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy
AT clarkcraig clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy