Cargando…
Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study
Infectious vaginitis due to bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and Trichomonas vaginalis accounts for a significant proportion of all gynecologic visits in the United States. A prospective multicenter clinical study was conducted to validate the performance of two new in vitro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31748322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01643-19 |
_version_ | 1783492348357902336 |
---|---|
author | Schwebke, Jane R. Taylor, Stephanie N. Ackerman, Ronald Schlaberg, Robert Quigley, Neil B. Gaydos, Charlotte A. Chavoustie, Steven E. Nyirjesy, Paul Remillard, Carmelle V. Estes, Philip McKinney, Byron Getman, Damon K. Clark, Craig |
author_facet | Schwebke, Jane R. Taylor, Stephanie N. Ackerman, Ronald Schlaberg, Robert Quigley, Neil B. Gaydos, Charlotte A. Chavoustie, Steven E. Nyirjesy, Paul Remillard, Carmelle V. Estes, Philip McKinney, Byron Getman, Damon K. Clark, Craig |
author_sort | Schwebke, Jane R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Infectious vaginitis due to bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and Trichomonas vaginalis accounts for a significant proportion of all gynecologic visits in the United States. A prospective multicenter clinical study was conducted to validate the performance of two new in vitro diagnostic transcription-mediated amplification nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for diagnosis of BV, VVC, and trichomoniasis. Patient- and clinician-collected vaginal-swab samples obtained from women with symptoms of vaginitis were tested with the Aptima BV and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas vaginitis (CV/TV) assays. The results were compared to Nugent (plus Amsel for intermediate Nugent) scores for BV, Candida cultures and DNA sequencing for VVC, and a composite of NAAT and culture for T. vaginalis. The prevalences of infection were similar for clinician- and patient-collected samples: 49% for BV, 29% for VVC due to the Candida species group, 4% for VVC due to Candida glabrata, and 10% for T. vaginalis. Sensitivity and specificity estimates for the investigational tests in clinician-collected samples were 95.0% and 89.6%, respectively, for BV; 91.7% and 94.9% for the Candida species group; 84.7% and 99.1% for C. glabrata; and 96.5% and 95.1% for T. vaginalis. Sensitivities and specificities were similar in patient-collected samples. In a secondary analysis, clinicians’ diagnoses, in-clinic assessments, and investigational-assay results were compared to gold standard reference methods. Overall, the investigational assays had higher sensitivity and specificity than clinicians’ diagnoses and in-clinic assessments, indicating that the investigational assays were more predictive of infection than traditional diagnostic methods. These results provide clinical-efficacy evidence for two in vitro diagnostic NAATs that can detect the main causes of vaginitis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6989072 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69890722020-02-11 Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study Schwebke, Jane R. Taylor, Stephanie N. Ackerman, Ronald Schlaberg, Robert Quigley, Neil B. Gaydos, Charlotte A. Chavoustie, Steven E. Nyirjesy, Paul Remillard, Carmelle V. Estes, Philip McKinney, Byron Getman, Damon K. Clark, Craig J Clin Microbiol Bacteriology Infectious vaginitis due to bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and Trichomonas vaginalis accounts for a significant proportion of all gynecologic visits in the United States. A prospective multicenter clinical study was conducted to validate the performance of two new in vitro diagnostic transcription-mediated amplification nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for diagnosis of BV, VVC, and trichomoniasis. Patient- and clinician-collected vaginal-swab samples obtained from women with symptoms of vaginitis were tested with the Aptima BV and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas vaginitis (CV/TV) assays. The results were compared to Nugent (plus Amsel for intermediate Nugent) scores for BV, Candida cultures and DNA sequencing for VVC, and a composite of NAAT and culture for T. vaginalis. The prevalences of infection were similar for clinician- and patient-collected samples: 49% for BV, 29% for VVC due to the Candida species group, 4% for VVC due to Candida glabrata, and 10% for T. vaginalis. Sensitivity and specificity estimates for the investigational tests in clinician-collected samples were 95.0% and 89.6%, respectively, for BV; 91.7% and 94.9% for the Candida species group; 84.7% and 99.1% for C. glabrata; and 96.5% and 95.1% for T. vaginalis. Sensitivities and specificities were similar in patient-collected samples. In a secondary analysis, clinicians’ diagnoses, in-clinic assessments, and investigational-assay results were compared to gold standard reference methods. Overall, the investigational assays had higher sensitivity and specificity than clinicians’ diagnoses and in-clinic assessments, indicating that the investigational assays were more predictive of infection than traditional diagnostic methods. These results provide clinical-efficacy evidence for two in vitro diagnostic NAATs that can detect the main causes of vaginitis. American Society for Microbiology 2020-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6989072/ /pubmed/31748322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01643-19 Text en Copyright © 2020 Schwebke et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Bacteriology Schwebke, Jane R. Taylor, Stephanie N. Ackerman, Ronald Schlaberg, Robert Quigley, Neil B. Gaydos, Charlotte A. Chavoustie, Steven E. Nyirjesy, Paul Remillard, Carmelle V. Estes, Philip McKinney, Byron Getman, Damon K. Clark, Craig Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study |
title | Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study |
title_full | Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study |
title_fullStr | Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study |
title_short | Clinical Validation of the Aptima Bacterial Vaginosis and Aptima Candida/Trichomonas Vaginitis Assays: Results from a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study |
title_sort | clinical validation of the aptima bacterial vaginosis and aptima candida/trichomonas vaginitis assays: results from a prospective multicenter clinical study |
topic | Bacteriology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989072/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31748322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01643-19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwebkejaner clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy AT taylorstephanien clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy AT ackermanronald clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy AT schlabergrobert clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy AT quigleyneilb clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy AT gaydoscharlottea clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy AT chavoustiestevene clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy AT nyirjesypaul clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy AT remillardcarmellev clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy AT estesphilip clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy AT mckinneybyron clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy AT getmandamonk clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy AT clarkcraig clinicalvalidationoftheaptimabacterialvaginosisandaptimacandidatrichomonasvaginitisassaysresultsfromaprospectivemulticenterclinicalstudy |