Cargando…
Advance care planning in glioblastoma patients: development of a disease-specific ACP program
BACKGROUND: It is unknown if the implementation of an advance care planning (ACP) program is feasible in daily clinical practice for glioblastoma patients. We aimed to develop an ACP program and assess the preferred content, the best time to introduce such a program in the disease trajectory, and po...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31243585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04916-9 |
_version_ | 1783492434053824512 |
---|---|
author | Fritz, Lara Zwinkels, Hanneke Koekkoek, Johan A. F. Reijneveld, Jaap C. Vos, Maaike J. Dirven, Linda Pasman, H. Roeline W. Taphoorn, Martin J. B. |
author_facet | Fritz, Lara Zwinkels, Hanneke Koekkoek, Johan A. F. Reijneveld, Jaap C. Vos, Maaike J. Dirven, Linda Pasman, H. Roeline W. Taphoorn, Martin J. B. |
author_sort | Fritz, Lara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is unknown if the implementation of an advance care planning (ACP) program is feasible in daily clinical practice for glioblastoma patients. We aimed to develop an ACP program and assess the preferred content, the best time to introduce such a program in the disease trajectory, and possible barriers and facilitators for participation and implementation. METHODS: A focus group with health care professionals (HCPs) and individual semi-structured interviews with patients and proxies (of both living and deceased patients) were conducted. RESULTS: All predefined topics were considered relevant by participants, including the current situation, worries/fears, (supportive) treatment options, and preferred place of care/death. Although HCPs and proxies of deceased patients indicated that the program should be implemented relatively early in the disease trajectory, patient-proxy dyads were more ambiguous. Several patient-proxy dyads indicated that the program should be initiated later in the disease trajectory. If introduced early, topics about the end of life should be postponed. A frequently mentioned barrier for participation was that the program would be too confronting, while a facilitator was adequate access to information. CONCLUSION: This study resulted in an ACP program specifically for glioblastoma patients. Although participants agreed on the program content, the optimal timing of introducing such a program was a matter of debate. Our solution is to offer the program shortly after diagnosis but let patients and proxies decide which topics they want to discuss and when. The impact of the program on several patient- and care-related outcomes will be evaluated in the next step. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-019-04916-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6989589 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69895892020-02-11 Advance care planning in glioblastoma patients: development of a disease-specific ACP program Fritz, Lara Zwinkels, Hanneke Koekkoek, Johan A. F. Reijneveld, Jaap C. Vos, Maaike J. Dirven, Linda Pasman, H. Roeline W. Taphoorn, Martin J. B. Support Care Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: It is unknown if the implementation of an advance care planning (ACP) program is feasible in daily clinical practice for glioblastoma patients. We aimed to develop an ACP program and assess the preferred content, the best time to introduce such a program in the disease trajectory, and possible barriers and facilitators for participation and implementation. METHODS: A focus group with health care professionals (HCPs) and individual semi-structured interviews with patients and proxies (of both living and deceased patients) were conducted. RESULTS: All predefined topics were considered relevant by participants, including the current situation, worries/fears, (supportive) treatment options, and preferred place of care/death. Although HCPs and proxies of deceased patients indicated that the program should be implemented relatively early in the disease trajectory, patient-proxy dyads were more ambiguous. Several patient-proxy dyads indicated that the program should be initiated later in the disease trajectory. If introduced early, topics about the end of life should be postponed. A frequently mentioned barrier for participation was that the program would be too confronting, while a facilitator was adequate access to information. CONCLUSION: This study resulted in an ACP program specifically for glioblastoma patients. Although participants agreed on the program content, the optimal timing of introducing such a program was a matter of debate. Our solution is to offer the program shortly after diagnosis but let patients and proxies decide which topics they want to discuss and when. The impact of the program on several patient- and care-related outcomes will be evaluated in the next step. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00520-019-04916-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-06-26 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6989589/ /pubmed/31243585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04916-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fritz, Lara Zwinkels, Hanneke Koekkoek, Johan A. F. Reijneveld, Jaap C. Vos, Maaike J. Dirven, Linda Pasman, H. Roeline W. Taphoorn, Martin J. B. Advance care planning in glioblastoma patients: development of a disease-specific ACP program |
title | Advance care planning in glioblastoma patients: development of a disease-specific ACP program |
title_full | Advance care planning in glioblastoma patients: development of a disease-specific ACP program |
title_fullStr | Advance care planning in glioblastoma patients: development of a disease-specific ACP program |
title_full_unstemmed | Advance care planning in glioblastoma patients: development of a disease-specific ACP program |
title_short | Advance care planning in glioblastoma patients: development of a disease-specific ACP program |
title_sort | advance care planning in glioblastoma patients: development of a disease-specific acp program |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989589/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31243585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04916-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fritzlara advancecareplanninginglioblastomapatientsdevelopmentofadiseasespecificacpprogram AT zwinkelshanneke advancecareplanninginglioblastomapatientsdevelopmentofadiseasespecificacpprogram AT koekkoekjohanaf advancecareplanninginglioblastomapatientsdevelopmentofadiseasespecificacpprogram AT reijneveldjaapc advancecareplanninginglioblastomapatientsdevelopmentofadiseasespecificacpprogram AT vosmaaikej advancecareplanninginglioblastomapatientsdevelopmentofadiseasespecificacpprogram AT dirvenlinda advancecareplanninginglioblastomapatientsdevelopmentofadiseasespecificacpprogram AT pasmanhroelinew advancecareplanninginglioblastomapatientsdevelopmentofadiseasespecificacpprogram AT taphoornmartinjb advancecareplanninginglioblastomapatientsdevelopmentofadiseasespecificacpprogram |