Cargando…

External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial

To observe the efficacy and safety of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole (EPVL) in patients with upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). A total of 271 patients with upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm were prospectively randomized into two groups. One h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tao, Rong-zhen, Tang, Qing-lai, Zhou, Shuang, Jia, Chun-ping, Lv, Jian-lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30488093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-018-1100-8
_version_ 1783492451530440704
author Tao, Rong-zhen
Tang, Qing-lai
Zhou, Shuang
Jia, Chun-ping
Lv, Jian-lin
author_facet Tao, Rong-zhen
Tang, Qing-lai
Zhou, Shuang
Jia, Chun-ping
Lv, Jian-lin
author_sort Tao, Rong-zhen
collection PubMed
description To observe the efficacy and safety of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole (EPVL) in patients with upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). A total of 271 patients with upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm were prospectively randomized into two groups. One hundred and twenty-seven cases in the treatment group accepted EPVL therapy and 144 cases as control after ESWL. The stone expulsion status and stone-free rates (SFRs) between two groups were compared at the 1st, 2nd and 4th weekends by imaging examinations. All of 271 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, of which 127 patients were included in the treatment group and 144 in the control group. EPVL was successful in assisting the discharge of stone fragments. The rate of stone expulsion at day 1 in the treatment group was significantly higher than in the control group (79.5% vs. 64.6%, P = 0.006). The SFRs of the 1st weekend (76.3% vs. 61.8%, P = 0.010), the 2nd weekend (88.2% vs. 77.1%, P = 0.017) and the 4th weekend (92.1% vs. 84.0%, P = 0.042) in the treatment group were all significantly higher than that in the control group. However, no statistical significance was found in complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, in the treatment group the patients were treated a mean 4.3 sessions of EPVL. EPVL and ESWL are ideal complementary partners in the treatment of upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm, satisfying both high SFR and low complication. This method is safe and reproducible in clinical practice, and it also needs large-scale multicenter prospective studies further to prove the above conclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6989669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69896692020-02-11 External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial Tao, Rong-zhen Tang, Qing-lai Zhou, Shuang Jia, Chun-ping Lv, Jian-lin Urolithiasis Original Paper To observe the efficacy and safety of External Physical Vibration Lithecbole (EPVL) in patients with upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). A total of 271 patients with upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm were prospectively randomized into two groups. One hundred and twenty-seven cases in the treatment group accepted EPVL therapy and 144 cases as control after ESWL. The stone expulsion status and stone-free rates (SFRs) between two groups were compared at the 1st, 2nd and 4th weekends by imaging examinations. All of 271 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, of which 127 patients were included in the treatment group and 144 in the control group. EPVL was successful in assisting the discharge of stone fragments. The rate of stone expulsion at day 1 in the treatment group was significantly higher than in the control group (79.5% vs. 64.6%, P = 0.006). The SFRs of the 1st weekend (76.3% vs. 61.8%, P = 0.010), the 2nd weekend (88.2% vs. 77.1%, P = 0.017) and the 4th weekend (92.1% vs. 84.0%, P = 0.042) in the treatment group were all significantly higher than that in the control group. However, no statistical significance was found in complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, in the treatment group the patients were treated a mean 4.3 sessions of EPVL. EPVL and ESWL are ideal complementary partners in the treatment of upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm, satisfying both high SFR and low complication. This method is safe and reproducible in clinical practice, and it also needs large-scale multicenter prospective studies further to prove the above conclusions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-11-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC6989669/ /pubmed/30488093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-018-1100-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Tao, Rong-zhen
Tang, Qing-lai
Zhou, Shuang
Jia, Chun-ping
Lv, Jian-lin
External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial
title External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial
title_full External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial
title_fullStr External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial
title_short External physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial
title_sort external physical vibration lithecbole facilitating the expulsion of upper ureteric stones 1.0–2.0 cm after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6989669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30488093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00240-018-1100-8
work_keys_str_mv AT taorongzhen externalphysicalvibrationlithecbolefacilitatingtheexpulsionofupperuretericstones1020cmafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT tangqinglai externalphysicalvibrationlithecbolefacilitatingtheexpulsionofupperuretericstones1020cmafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT zhoushuang externalphysicalvibrationlithecbolefacilitatingtheexpulsionofupperuretericstones1020cmafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT jiachunping externalphysicalvibrationlithecbolefacilitatingtheexpulsionofupperuretericstones1020cmafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT lvjianlin externalphysicalvibrationlithecbolefacilitatingtheexpulsionofupperuretericstones1020cmafterextracorporealshockwavelithotripsyaprospectiverandomizedtrial