Cargando…
The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation
According to the dual systems perspective, risk taking peaks during adolescence because activation of an early-maturing socioemotional-incentive processing system amplifies adolescents’ affinity for exciting, pleasurable, and novel activities at a time when a still immature cognitive control system...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6990093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26774291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010 |
_version_ | 1783492472111890432 |
---|---|
author | Shulman, Elizabeth P. Smith, Ashley R. Silva, Karol Icenogle, Grace Duell, Natasha Chein, Jason Steinberg, Laurence |
author_facet | Shulman, Elizabeth P. Smith, Ashley R. Silva, Karol Icenogle, Grace Duell, Natasha Chein, Jason Steinberg, Laurence |
author_sort | Shulman, Elizabeth P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to the dual systems perspective, risk taking peaks during adolescence because activation of an early-maturing socioemotional-incentive processing system amplifies adolescents’ affinity for exciting, pleasurable, and novel activities at a time when a still immature cognitive control system is not yet strong enough to consistently restrain potentially hazardous impulses. We review evidence from both the psychological and neuroimaging literatures that has emerged since 2008, when this perspective was originally articulated. Although there are occasional exceptions to the general trends, studies show that, as predicted, psychological and neural manifestations of reward sensitivity increase between childhood and adolescence, peak sometime during the late teen years, and decline thereafter, whereas psychological and neural reflections of better cognitive control increase gradually and linearly throughout adolescence and into the early 20s. While some forms of real-world risky behavior peak at a later age than predicted, this likely reflects differential opportunities for risk-taking in late adolescence and young adulthood, rather than neurobiological differences that make this age group more reckless. Although it is admittedly an oversimplification, as a heuristic device, the dual systems model provides a far more accurate account of adolescent risk taking than prior models that have attributed adolescent recklessness to cognitive deficiencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6990093 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69900932020-02-03 The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation Shulman, Elizabeth P. Smith, Ashley R. Silva, Karol Icenogle, Grace Duell, Natasha Chein, Jason Steinberg, Laurence Dev Cogn Neurosci Special section: The Developmental Neuroscience of Adolescen Revisiting, Refining, and Extending Seminal Model According to the dual systems perspective, risk taking peaks during adolescence because activation of an early-maturing socioemotional-incentive processing system amplifies adolescents’ affinity for exciting, pleasurable, and novel activities at a time when a still immature cognitive control system is not yet strong enough to consistently restrain potentially hazardous impulses. We review evidence from both the psychological and neuroimaging literatures that has emerged since 2008, when this perspective was originally articulated. Although there are occasional exceptions to the general trends, studies show that, as predicted, psychological and neural manifestations of reward sensitivity increase between childhood and adolescence, peak sometime during the late teen years, and decline thereafter, whereas psychological and neural reflections of better cognitive control increase gradually and linearly throughout adolescence and into the early 20s. While some forms of real-world risky behavior peak at a later age than predicted, this likely reflects differential opportunities for risk-taking in late adolescence and young adulthood, rather than neurobiological differences that make this age group more reckless. Although it is admittedly an oversimplification, as a heuristic device, the dual systems model provides a far more accurate account of adolescent risk taking than prior models that have attributed adolescent recklessness to cognitive deficiencies. Elsevier 2015-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6990093/ /pubmed/26774291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Special section: The Developmental Neuroscience of Adolescen Revisiting, Refining, and Extending Seminal Model Shulman, Elizabeth P. Smith, Ashley R. Silva, Karol Icenogle, Grace Duell, Natasha Chein, Jason Steinberg, Laurence The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation |
title | The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation |
title_full | The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation |
title_fullStr | The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation |
title_full_unstemmed | The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation |
title_short | The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation |
title_sort | dual systems model: review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation |
topic | Special section: The Developmental Neuroscience of Adolescen Revisiting, Refining, and Extending Seminal Model |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6990093/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26774291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shulmanelizabethp thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation AT smithashleyr thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation AT silvakarol thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation AT icenoglegrace thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation AT duellnatasha thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation AT cheinjason thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation AT steinberglaurence thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation AT shulmanelizabethp dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation AT smithashleyr dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation AT silvakarol dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation AT icenoglegrace dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation AT duellnatasha dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation AT cheinjason dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation AT steinberglaurence dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation |