Cargando…

The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation

According to the dual systems perspective, risk taking peaks during adolescence because activation of an early-maturing socioemotional-incentive processing system amplifies adolescents’ affinity for exciting, pleasurable, and novel activities at a time when a still immature cognitive control system...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shulman, Elizabeth P., Smith, Ashley R., Silva, Karol, Icenogle, Grace, Duell, Natasha, Chein, Jason, Steinberg, Laurence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6990093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26774291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010
_version_ 1783492472111890432
author Shulman, Elizabeth P.
Smith, Ashley R.
Silva, Karol
Icenogle, Grace
Duell, Natasha
Chein, Jason
Steinberg, Laurence
author_facet Shulman, Elizabeth P.
Smith, Ashley R.
Silva, Karol
Icenogle, Grace
Duell, Natasha
Chein, Jason
Steinberg, Laurence
author_sort Shulman, Elizabeth P.
collection PubMed
description According to the dual systems perspective, risk taking peaks during adolescence because activation of an early-maturing socioemotional-incentive processing system amplifies adolescents’ affinity for exciting, pleasurable, and novel activities at a time when a still immature cognitive control system is not yet strong enough to consistently restrain potentially hazardous impulses. We review evidence from both the psychological and neuroimaging literatures that has emerged since 2008, when this perspective was originally articulated. Although there are occasional exceptions to the general trends, studies show that, as predicted, psychological and neural manifestations of reward sensitivity increase between childhood and adolescence, peak sometime during the late teen years, and decline thereafter, whereas psychological and neural reflections of better cognitive control increase gradually and linearly throughout adolescence and into the early 20s. While some forms of real-world risky behavior peak at a later age than predicted, this likely reflects differential opportunities for risk-taking in late adolescence and young adulthood, rather than neurobiological differences that make this age group more reckless. Although it is admittedly an oversimplification, as a heuristic device, the dual systems model provides a far more accurate account of adolescent risk taking than prior models that have attributed adolescent recklessness to cognitive deficiencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6990093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69900932020-02-03 The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation Shulman, Elizabeth P. Smith, Ashley R. Silva, Karol Icenogle, Grace Duell, Natasha Chein, Jason Steinberg, Laurence Dev Cogn Neurosci Special section: The Developmental Neuroscience of Adolescen Revisiting, Refining, and Extending Seminal Model According to the dual systems perspective, risk taking peaks during adolescence because activation of an early-maturing socioemotional-incentive processing system amplifies adolescents’ affinity for exciting, pleasurable, and novel activities at a time when a still immature cognitive control system is not yet strong enough to consistently restrain potentially hazardous impulses. We review evidence from both the psychological and neuroimaging literatures that has emerged since 2008, when this perspective was originally articulated. Although there are occasional exceptions to the general trends, studies show that, as predicted, psychological and neural manifestations of reward sensitivity increase between childhood and adolescence, peak sometime during the late teen years, and decline thereafter, whereas psychological and neural reflections of better cognitive control increase gradually and linearly throughout adolescence and into the early 20s. While some forms of real-world risky behavior peak at a later age than predicted, this likely reflects differential opportunities for risk-taking in late adolescence and young adulthood, rather than neurobiological differences that make this age group more reckless. Although it is admittedly an oversimplification, as a heuristic device, the dual systems model provides a far more accurate account of adolescent risk taking than prior models that have attributed adolescent recklessness to cognitive deficiencies. Elsevier 2015-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6990093/ /pubmed/26774291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Special section: The Developmental Neuroscience of Adolescen Revisiting, Refining, and Extending Seminal Model
Shulman, Elizabeth P.
Smith, Ashley R.
Silva, Karol
Icenogle, Grace
Duell, Natasha
Chein, Jason
Steinberg, Laurence
The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation
title The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation
title_full The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation
title_fullStr The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation
title_full_unstemmed The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation
title_short The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation
title_sort dual systems model: review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation
topic Special section: The Developmental Neuroscience of Adolescen Revisiting, Refining, and Extending Seminal Model
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6990093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26774291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010
work_keys_str_mv AT shulmanelizabethp thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation
AT smithashleyr thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation
AT silvakarol thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation
AT icenoglegrace thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation
AT duellnatasha thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation
AT cheinjason thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation
AT steinberglaurence thedualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation
AT shulmanelizabethp dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation
AT smithashleyr dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation
AT silvakarol dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation
AT icenoglegrace dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation
AT duellnatasha dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation
AT cheinjason dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation
AT steinberglaurence dualsystemsmodelreviewreappraisalandreaffirmation