Cargando…
Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine?
INTRODUCTION: Hybrid stabilization is an accepted therapy strategy for unstable osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures. However, a moderate reduction loss has been reported and it remains unclear which anatomic structure is responsible for the reduction loss. METHODS: This retrospective study was perf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6990563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3065-3 |
_version_ | 1783492528570368000 |
---|---|
author | Spiegl, Ulrich J. Ahrberg, Annette B. Anemüller, Christine Jarvers, Jan-Sven Glasmacher, Stefan von der Höh, Nicolaus Josten, Christoph Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard |
author_facet | Spiegl, Ulrich J. Ahrberg, Annette B. Anemüller, Christine Jarvers, Jan-Sven Glasmacher, Stefan von der Höh, Nicolaus Josten, Christoph Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard |
author_sort | Spiegl, Ulrich J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Hybrid stabilization is an accepted therapy strategy for unstable osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures. However, a moderate reduction loss has been reported and it remains unclear which anatomic structure is responsible for the reduction loss. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed at a level I trauma center. Patients aged 61 and older were stabilized using hybrid stabilization after suffering acute and unstable osteoporotic vertebral body fractures at the thoracolumbar spine. Posterior stabilization was done short-segmental and minimal invasive with cement-augmentation of all pedicle screws. The minimum follow-up has been 2 years. The outcome parameters were the reduction loss and the relative loss of height of both intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebral body, the fractured vertebral body and a reference disc (intervertebral disc superior of the stabilization) between the postoperative and latest lateral radiographs. Additionally, implant positioning and loosening was analyzed. RESULTS: 29 mainly female (72%) patients (73.3 ± 6.0 years) were included. Fractures consisted of 26 incomplete burst fractures and 3 complete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (Th11 – L2: 86%) and the midlumbar spine. The mean follow-up time was 36 months (range: 24–58 months). The mean reduction loss was 7.7° (range: 1–25). The relative loss of heights of both intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebral body, the reference disc, and the central vertebral body were significant. Thereby, the relative loss of the superior disc height was significant higher compared to the reference disc. Additionally, only the relative loss of central vertebral body height and reduction loss correlated significantly. There were no signs of implant loosening in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: The mean reduction loss was moderate 3 years after hybrid stabilization of unstable osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. A significant loss of both adjacent disc heights and the central vertebral body was seen, with the highest loss in the superior adjacent disc significantly outranging the reference disc. The superior adjacent intervertebral disc and the central part of the fractured vertebral body seem to be responsible for the majority of reduction loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6990563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69905632020-02-04 Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? Spiegl, Ulrich J. Ahrberg, Annette B. Anemüller, Christine Jarvers, Jan-Sven Glasmacher, Stefan von der Höh, Nicolaus Josten, Christoph Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article INTRODUCTION: Hybrid stabilization is an accepted therapy strategy for unstable osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures. However, a moderate reduction loss has been reported and it remains unclear which anatomic structure is responsible for the reduction loss. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed at a level I trauma center. Patients aged 61 and older were stabilized using hybrid stabilization after suffering acute and unstable osteoporotic vertebral body fractures at the thoracolumbar spine. Posterior stabilization was done short-segmental and minimal invasive with cement-augmentation of all pedicle screws. The minimum follow-up has been 2 years. The outcome parameters were the reduction loss and the relative loss of height of both intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebral body, the fractured vertebral body and a reference disc (intervertebral disc superior of the stabilization) between the postoperative and latest lateral radiographs. Additionally, implant positioning and loosening was analyzed. RESULTS: 29 mainly female (72%) patients (73.3 ± 6.0 years) were included. Fractures consisted of 26 incomplete burst fractures and 3 complete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (Th11 – L2: 86%) and the midlumbar spine. The mean follow-up time was 36 months (range: 24–58 months). The mean reduction loss was 7.7° (range: 1–25). The relative loss of heights of both intervertebral discs adjacent to the fractured vertebral body, the reference disc, and the central vertebral body were significant. Thereby, the relative loss of the superior disc height was significant higher compared to the reference disc. Additionally, only the relative loss of central vertebral body height and reduction loss correlated significantly. There were no signs of implant loosening in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: The mean reduction loss was moderate 3 years after hybrid stabilization of unstable osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. A significant loss of both adjacent disc heights and the central vertebral body was seen, with the highest loss in the superior adjacent disc significantly outranging the reference disc. The superior adjacent intervertebral disc and the central part of the fractured vertebral body seem to be responsible for the majority of reduction loss. BioMed Central 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6990563/ /pubmed/31996180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3065-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Spiegl, Ulrich J. Ahrberg, Annette B. Anemüller, Christine Jarvers, Jan-Sven Glasmacher, Stefan von der Höh, Nicolaus Josten, Christoph Heyde, Christoph-Eckhard Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? |
title | Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? |
title_full | Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? |
title_fullStr | Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? |
title_full_unstemmed | Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? |
title_short | Which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? |
title_sort | which anatomic structures are responsible for the reduction loss after hybrid stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6990563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3065-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spieglulrichj whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT ahrbergannetteb whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT anemullerchristine whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT jarversjansven whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT glasmacherstefan whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT vonderhohnicolaus whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT jostenchristoph whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine AT heydechristopheckhard whichanatomicstructuresareresponsibleforthereductionlossafterhybridstabilizationofosteoporoticfracturesofthethoracolumbarspine |