Cargando…

Mid- to long-term effects of two different biological reconstruction techniques for the treatment of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri

BACKGROUND: The proximal humerus is one of the most common sites of primary or metastatic malignant tumors. Reconstruction of the shoulder after tumor resection is controversial and challenging. When intra-articular resection is performed, biological reconstruction (osteoarticular allograft and auto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yao, Weitao, Cai, Qiqing, Wang, Jiaqiang, Hou, Jingyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6990589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-1797-z
_version_ 1783492534695100416
author Yao, Weitao
Cai, Qiqing
Wang, Jiaqiang
Hou, Jingyu
author_facet Yao, Weitao
Cai, Qiqing
Wang, Jiaqiang
Hou, Jingyu
author_sort Yao, Weitao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The proximal humerus is one of the most common sites of primary or metastatic malignant tumors. Reconstruction of the shoulder after tumor resection is controversial and challenging. When intra-articular resection is performed, biological reconstruction (osteoarticular allograft and autologous bone implantation) may be the first choice rather than prosthetic reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: To observe the mid- to long-term effects of oncologic, reconstructive, and functional outcomes of two different biological reconstruction methods for resection of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 13 consecutive patients who underwent humeral reconstruction of osteosarcoma including caput humeri using osteoarticular allograft (n = 7) and tumor bone inactivated and reimplantation (TBIR, n = 6) in our clinic between 2007 and 2017. Patients’ general information, resection and reconstruction techniques, oncological and functional outcomes, and complications were collected and evaluated. Different complications of implantations were compared and analyzed for the different biological methods. RESULTS: The study included ten males and three females with an average age of 19.15 years. The operation time was about 3.65 h with an average blood loss of 631 ml. The resection tumor bones were 13–45 cm (23.54 cm on average). The mean follow-up period was 5.27 years. The shoulder movement was 10–70° (average, 44.00°) in abduction, 0–30° (average, 14.17°) in flexion, and 0–20° (average, 11.90°) in extention at the last follow-up. The complications included fracture in four TBIR patients and two allograft patients with an average of 2.67 years postoperation. Fracture rate was higher and appeared time was earlier in TBIR patients than in allograft patients (p = 0.04); caput humeri absorption occurred in all seven allograft patients and three TBIR patients at an average of 3.10 years after surgery; severe graft bone resorption appeared in five TBIR patients and two allograft patients at an average of 2.57 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Humerus biological reconstruction involving caput humeri was associated with a high complication rate and acceptable limb function in the mid to long term. New combined biological methods should be explored and adopted in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6990589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69905892020-02-04 Mid- to long-term effects of two different biological reconstruction techniques for the treatment of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri Yao, Weitao Cai, Qiqing Wang, Jiaqiang Hou, Jingyu World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The proximal humerus is one of the most common sites of primary or metastatic malignant tumors. Reconstruction of the shoulder after tumor resection is controversial and challenging. When intra-articular resection is performed, biological reconstruction (osteoarticular allograft and autologous bone implantation) may be the first choice rather than prosthetic reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: To observe the mid- to long-term effects of oncologic, reconstructive, and functional outcomes of two different biological reconstruction methods for resection of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 13 consecutive patients who underwent humeral reconstruction of osteosarcoma including caput humeri using osteoarticular allograft (n = 7) and tumor bone inactivated and reimplantation (TBIR, n = 6) in our clinic between 2007 and 2017. Patients’ general information, resection and reconstruction techniques, oncological and functional outcomes, and complications were collected and evaluated. Different complications of implantations were compared and analyzed for the different biological methods. RESULTS: The study included ten males and three females with an average age of 19.15 years. The operation time was about 3.65 h with an average blood loss of 631 ml. The resection tumor bones were 13–45 cm (23.54 cm on average). The mean follow-up period was 5.27 years. The shoulder movement was 10–70° (average, 44.00°) in abduction, 0–30° (average, 14.17°) in flexion, and 0–20° (average, 11.90°) in extention at the last follow-up. The complications included fracture in four TBIR patients and two allograft patients with an average of 2.67 years postoperation. Fracture rate was higher and appeared time was earlier in TBIR patients than in allograft patients (p = 0.04); caput humeri absorption occurred in all seven allograft patients and three TBIR patients at an average of 3.10 years after surgery; severe graft bone resorption appeared in five TBIR patients and two allograft patients at an average of 2.57 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Humerus biological reconstruction involving caput humeri was associated with a high complication rate and acceptable limb function in the mid to long term. New combined biological methods should be explored and adopted in the future. BioMed Central 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6990589/ /pubmed/31996228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-1797-z Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Yao, Weitao
Cai, Qiqing
Wang, Jiaqiang
Hou, Jingyu
Mid- to long-term effects of two different biological reconstruction techniques for the treatment of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri
title Mid- to long-term effects of two different biological reconstruction techniques for the treatment of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri
title_full Mid- to long-term effects of two different biological reconstruction techniques for the treatment of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri
title_fullStr Mid- to long-term effects of two different biological reconstruction techniques for the treatment of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri
title_full_unstemmed Mid- to long-term effects of two different biological reconstruction techniques for the treatment of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri
title_short Mid- to long-term effects of two different biological reconstruction techniques for the treatment of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri
title_sort mid- to long-term effects of two different biological reconstruction techniques for the treatment of humerus osteosarcoma involving caput humeri
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6990589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31996228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-1797-z
work_keys_str_mv AT yaoweitao midtolongtermeffectsoftwodifferentbiologicalreconstructiontechniquesforthetreatmentofhumerusosteosarcomainvolvingcaputhumeri
AT caiqiqing midtolongtermeffectsoftwodifferentbiologicalreconstructiontechniquesforthetreatmentofhumerusosteosarcomainvolvingcaputhumeri
AT wangjiaqiang midtolongtermeffectsoftwodifferentbiologicalreconstructiontechniquesforthetreatmentofhumerusosteosarcomainvolvingcaputhumeri
AT houjingyu midtolongtermeffectsoftwodifferentbiologicalreconstructiontechniquesforthetreatmentofhumerusosteosarcomainvolvingcaputhumeri