Cargando…

Treatment of Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears—Part 1: Gap Formation and Stabilization Potential of Repair Techniques

BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), with fixation techniques evolving. However, to date, there have been no biomechanical studies comparing fixed to adjustable fixation repair techniques. HYPOTHESIS: Adjustable ACL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bachmaier, Samuel, DiFelice, Gregory S., Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand, Douoguih, Wiemi A., Smith, Patrick A., Pace, Lee J., Ritter, Daniel, Wijdicks, Coen A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6990615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119897421
_version_ 1783492540789424128
author Bachmaier, Samuel
DiFelice, Gregory S.
Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
Douoguih, Wiemi A.
Smith, Patrick A.
Pace, Lee J.
Ritter, Daniel
Wijdicks, Coen A.
author_facet Bachmaier, Samuel
DiFelice, Gregory S.
Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
Douoguih, Wiemi A.
Smith, Patrick A.
Pace, Lee J.
Ritter, Daniel
Wijdicks, Coen A.
author_sort Bachmaier, Samuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), with fixation techniques evolving. However, to date, there have been no biomechanical studies comparing fixed to adjustable fixation repair techniques. HYPOTHESIS: Adjustable ACL repair provides for improved stabilization compared with fixed techniques with respect to both gap formation and residual load-bearing capability. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 4 different ACL repair techniques (n = 5 per group), including single– and double–cinch loop (CL) cortical button fixation as well as knotless single–suture anchor fixation, were tested using a porcine model. For adjustable single-CL loop fixation, additional preconditioning (10 cycles at 0.5 Hz) was performed. The force after fixation and the actuator displacement to achieve a time-zero preload of 10 N were measured for fixed techniques. Incrementally increasing cycling (1 mm/500 cycles) from 1 to 8 mm was performed for 4000 cycles at 0.75 Hz before pull to failure (50 mm/min). The final residual peak load and gap formation for each test block were analyzed as well as ultimate strength. RESULTS: Knot tying of a single-CL over a button (mean ± SD, 0.66 ± 0.23 mm) and knotless anchor fixation (0.20 ± 0.12 mm) resulted in significant time-zero gaps (P < .001) and significantly higher overall gap formation at reduced residual loading (analysis of covariance, P < .001) compared with both the double-CL loop and adjustable fixation techniques. The adjustable group showed the highest failure load and stiffness, at 305.7 N and 117.1 N/mm, respectively. The failure load of the knotted single-CL group was significantly reduced compared with all other groups (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Adjustable single-CL cortical button fixation with intraoperative preconditioning optimized time-zero ACL tension and led to significantly improved stabilization and reduced gap formation, with the highest ultimate strength. Single-CL loop knot tying over the button and knotless anchor fixation resulted in time-zero gaps to achieve slight tension on the ACL and significantly higher gap formation at reduced load-bearing capability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the clinical relevance of gap formation is uncertain, a biomechanical understanding of the stabilization potential of current ACL repair techniques is pertinent to the continued evolution of surgical approaches to enable better clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6990615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69906152020-02-14 Treatment of Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears—Part 1: Gap Formation and Stabilization Potential of Repair Techniques Bachmaier, Samuel DiFelice, Gregory S. Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand Douoguih, Wiemi A. Smith, Patrick A. Pace, Lee J. Ritter, Daniel Wijdicks, Coen A. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), with fixation techniques evolving. However, to date, there have been no biomechanical studies comparing fixed to adjustable fixation repair techniques. HYPOTHESIS: Adjustable ACL repair provides for improved stabilization compared with fixed techniques with respect to both gap formation and residual load-bearing capability. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 4 different ACL repair techniques (n = 5 per group), including single– and double–cinch loop (CL) cortical button fixation as well as knotless single–suture anchor fixation, were tested using a porcine model. For adjustable single-CL loop fixation, additional preconditioning (10 cycles at 0.5 Hz) was performed. The force after fixation and the actuator displacement to achieve a time-zero preload of 10 N were measured for fixed techniques. Incrementally increasing cycling (1 mm/500 cycles) from 1 to 8 mm was performed for 4000 cycles at 0.75 Hz before pull to failure (50 mm/min). The final residual peak load and gap formation for each test block were analyzed as well as ultimate strength. RESULTS: Knot tying of a single-CL over a button (mean ± SD, 0.66 ± 0.23 mm) and knotless anchor fixation (0.20 ± 0.12 mm) resulted in significant time-zero gaps (P < .001) and significantly higher overall gap formation at reduced residual loading (analysis of covariance, P < .001) compared with both the double-CL loop and adjustable fixation techniques. The adjustable group showed the highest failure load and stiffness, at 305.7 N and 117.1 N/mm, respectively. The failure load of the knotted single-CL group was significantly reduced compared with all other groups (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Adjustable single-CL cortical button fixation with intraoperative preconditioning optimized time-zero ACL tension and led to significantly improved stabilization and reduced gap formation, with the highest ultimate strength. Single-CL loop knot tying over the button and knotless anchor fixation resulted in time-zero gaps to achieve slight tension on the ACL and significantly higher gap formation at reduced load-bearing capability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the clinical relevance of gap formation is uncertain, a biomechanical understanding of the stabilization potential of current ACL repair techniques is pertinent to the continued evolution of surgical approaches to enable better clinical outcomes. SAGE Publications 2020-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6990615/ /pubmed/32064293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119897421 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Bachmaier, Samuel
DiFelice, Gregory S.
Sonnery-Cottet, Bertrand
Douoguih, Wiemi A.
Smith, Patrick A.
Pace, Lee J.
Ritter, Daniel
Wijdicks, Coen A.
Treatment of Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears—Part 1: Gap Formation and Stabilization Potential of Repair Techniques
title Treatment of Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears—Part 1: Gap Formation and Stabilization Potential of Repair Techniques
title_full Treatment of Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears—Part 1: Gap Formation and Stabilization Potential of Repair Techniques
title_fullStr Treatment of Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears—Part 1: Gap Formation and Stabilization Potential of Repair Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears—Part 1: Gap Formation and Stabilization Potential of Repair Techniques
title_short Treatment of Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears—Part 1: Gap Formation and Stabilization Potential of Repair Techniques
title_sort treatment of acute proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears—part 1: gap formation and stabilization potential of repair techniques
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6990615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32064293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967119897421
work_keys_str_mv AT bachmaiersamuel treatmentofacuteproximalanteriorcruciateligamenttearspart1gapformationandstabilizationpotentialofrepairtechniques
AT difelicegregorys treatmentofacuteproximalanteriorcruciateligamenttearspart1gapformationandstabilizationpotentialofrepairtechniques
AT sonnerycottetbertrand treatmentofacuteproximalanteriorcruciateligamenttearspart1gapformationandstabilizationpotentialofrepairtechniques
AT douoguihwiemia treatmentofacuteproximalanteriorcruciateligamenttearspart1gapformationandstabilizationpotentialofrepairtechniques
AT smithpatricka treatmentofacuteproximalanteriorcruciateligamenttearspart1gapformationandstabilizationpotentialofrepairtechniques
AT paceleej treatmentofacuteproximalanteriorcruciateligamenttearspart1gapformationandstabilizationpotentialofrepairtechniques
AT ritterdaniel treatmentofacuteproximalanteriorcruciateligamenttearspart1gapformationandstabilizationpotentialofrepairtechniques
AT wijdickscoena treatmentofacuteproximalanteriorcruciateligamenttearspart1gapformationandstabilizationpotentialofrepairtechniques