Cargando…

A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology

IMPORTANCE: Citation analysis is a bibliometric method that uses citation rates to evaluate research performance. This type of analysis can identify the articles that have shaped the modern history of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN). OBJECTIVES: To identify and characterize top-cited OBGYN article...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brandt, Justin S., Hadaya, Ola, Schuster, Meike, Rosen, Todd, Sauer, Mark V., Ananth, Cande V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6991228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31860106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18007
_version_ 1783492614779043840
author Brandt, Justin S.
Hadaya, Ola
Schuster, Meike
Rosen, Todd
Sauer, Mark V.
Ananth, Cande V.
author_facet Brandt, Justin S.
Hadaya, Ola
Schuster, Meike
Rosen, Todd
Sauer, Mark V.
Ananth, Cande V.
author_sort Brandt, Justin S.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Citation analysis is a bibliometric method that uses citation rates to evaluate research performance. This type of analysis can identify the articles that have shaped the modern history of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN). OBJECTIVES: To identify and characterize top-cited OBGYN articles in the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science’s Science Citation Index Expanded and to compare top-cited OBGYN articles published in specialty OBGYN journals with those published in nonspecialty journals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional bibliometric analysis of top-cited articles that were indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded from 1980 to 2018. The Science Citation Index Expanded was queried using search terms from the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology’s 2018 certifying examination topics list. The top 100 articles from all journals and the top 100 articles from OBGYN journals were evaluated for specific characteristics. Data were analyzed in March 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The articles were characterized by citation number, publication year, topic, study design, and authorship. After excluding articles that featured on both lists, top-cited articles were compared. RESULTS: The query identified 3 767 874 articles, of which 278 846 (7.4%) were published in OBGYN journals. The top-cited article was published by Rossouw and colleagues in JAMA (2002). Top-cited articles published in nonspecialty journals were more frequently cited than those in OBGYN journals (median [interquartile range], 1738 [1490-2077] citations vs 666 [580-843] citations, respectively; P < .001) and were more likely to be randomized trials (25.0% vs 2.2%, respectively; difference, 22.8%; 95% CI, 13.5%-32.2%; P < .001). Whereas articles from nonspecialty journals focused on broad topics like osteoporosis, articles from OBGYN journal focused on topics like preeclampsia and endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found substantial differences between top-cited OBGYN articles published in nonspecialty vs OBGYN journals. These differences may reflect the different goals of the journals, which work together to ensure optimal dissemination of impactful articles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6991228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69912282020-02-11 A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology Brandt, Justin S. Hadaya, Ola Schuster, Meike Rosen, Todd Sauer, Mark V. Ananth, Cande V. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Citation analysis is a bibliometric method that uses citation rates to evaluate research performance. This type of analysis can identify the articles that have shaped the modern history of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN). OBJECTIVES: To identify and characterize top-cited OBGYN articles in the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science’s Science Citation Index Expanded and to compare top-cited OBGYN articles published in specialty OBGYN journals with those published in nonspecialty journals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional bibliometric analysis of top-cited articles that were indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded from 1980 to 2018. The Science Citation Index Expanded was queried using search terms from the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology’s 2018 certifying examination topics list. The top 100 articles from all journals and the top 100 articles from OBGYN journals were evaluated for specific characteristics. Data were analyzed in March 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The articles were characterized by citation number, publication year, topic, study design, and authorship. After excluding articles that featured on both lists, top-cited articles were compared. RESULTS: The query identified 3 767 874 articles, of which 278 846 (7.4%) were published in OBGYN journals. The top-cited article was published by Rossouw and colleagues in JAMA (2002). Top-cited articles published in nonspecialty journals were more frequently cited than those in OBGYN journals (median [interquartile range], 1738 [1490-2077] citations vs 666 [580-843] citations, respectively; P < .001) and were more likely to be randomized trials (25.0% vs 2.2%, respectively; difference, 22.8%; 95% CI, 13.5%-32.2%; P < .001). Whereas articles from nonspecialty journals focused on broad topics like osteoporosis, articles from OBGYN journal focused on topics like preeclampsia and endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found substantial differences between top-cited OBGYN articles published in nonspecialty vs OBGYN journals. These differences may reflect the different goals of the journals, which work together to ensure optimal dissemination of impactful articles. American Medical Association 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6991228/ /pubmed/31860106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18007 Text en Copyright 2019 Brandt JS et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Brandt, Justin S.
Hadaya, Ola
Schuster, Meike
Rosen, Todd
Sauer, Mark V.
Ananth, Cande V.
A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology
title A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology
title_full A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology
title_fullStr A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology
title_full_unstemmed A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology
title_short A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology
title_sort bibliometric analysis of top-cited journal articles in obstetrics and gynecology
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6991228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31860106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18007
work_keys_str_mv AT brandtjustins abibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology
AT hadayaola abibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology
AT schustermeike abibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology
AT rosentodd abibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology
AT sauermarkv abibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology
AT ananthcandev abibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology
AT brandtjustins bibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology
AT hadayaola bibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology
AT schustermeike bibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology
AT rosentodd bibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology
AT sauermarkv bibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology
AT ananthcandev bibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology