Cargando…
A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology
IMPORTANCE: Citation analysis is a bibliometric method that uses citation rates to evaluate research performance. This type of analysis can identify the articles that have shaped the modern history of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN). OBJECTIVES: To identify and characterize top-cited OBGYN article...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6991228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31860106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18007 |
_version_ | 1783492614779043840 |
---|---|
author | Brandt, Justin S. Hadaya, Ola Schuster, Meike Rosen, Todd Sauer, Mark V. Ananth, Cande V. |
author_facet | Brandt, Justin S. Hadaya, Ola Schuster, Meike Rosen, Todd Sauer, Mark V. Ananth, Cande V. |
author_sort | Brandt, Justin S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Citation analysis is a bibliometric method that uses citation rates to evaluate research performance. This type of analysis can identify the articles that have shaped the modern history of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN). OBJECTIVES: To identify and characterize top-cited OBGYN articles in the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science’s Science Citation Index Expanded and to compare top-cited OBGYN articles published in specialty OBGYN journals with those published in nonspecialty journals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional bibliometric analysis of top-cited articles that were indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded from 1980 to 2018. The Science Citation Index Expanded was queried using search terms from the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology’s 2018 certifying examination topics list. The top 100 articles from all journals and the top 100 articles from OBGYN journals were evaluated for specific characteristics. Data were analyzed in March 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The articles were characterized by citation number, publication year, topic, study design, and authorship. After excluding articles that featured on both lists, top-cited articles were compared. RESULTS: The query identified 3 767 874 articles, of which 278 846 (7.4%) were published in OBGYN journals. The top-cited article was published by Rossouw and colleagues in JAMA (2002). Top-cited articles published in nonspecialty journals were more frequently cited than those in OBGYN journals (median [interquartile range], 1738 [1490-2077] citations vs 666 [580-843] citations, respectively; P < .001) and were more likely to be randomized trials (25.0% vs 2.2%, respectively; difference, 22.8%; 95% CI, 13.5%-32.2%; P < .001). Whereas articles from nonspecialty journals focused on broad topics like osteoporosis, articles from OBGYN journal focused on topics like preeclampsia and endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found substantial differences between top-cited OBGYN articles published in nonspecialty vs OBGYN journals. These differences may reflect the different goals of the journals, which work together to ensure optimal dissemination of impactful articles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6991228 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69912282020-02-11 A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology Brandt, Justin S. Hadaya, Ola Schuster, Meike Rosen, Todd Sauer, Mark V. Ananth, Cande V. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Citation analysis is a bibliometric method that uses citation rates to evaluate research performance. This type of analysis can identify the articles that have shaped the modern history of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN). OBJECTIVES: To identify and characterize top-cited OBGYN articles in the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science’s Science Citation Index Expanded and to compare top-cited OBGYN articles published in specialty OBGYN journals with those published in nonspecialty journals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional bibliometric analysis of top-cited articles that were indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded from 1980 to 2018. The Science Citation Index Expanded was queried using search terms from the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology’s 2018 certifying examination topics list. The top 100 articles from all journals and the top 100 articles from OBGYN journals were evaluated for specific characteristics. Data were analyzed in March 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The articles were characterized by citation number, publication year, topic, study design, and authorship. After excluding articles that featured on both lists, top-cited articles were compared. RESULTS: The query identified 3 767 874 articles, of which 278 846 (7.4%) were published in OBGYN journals. The top-cited article was published by Rossouw and colleagues in JAMA (2002). Top-cited articles published in nonspecialty journals were more frequently cited than those in OBGYN journals (median [interquartile range], 1738 [1490-2077] citations vs 666 [580-843] citations, respectively; P < .001) and were more likely to be randomized trials (25.0% vs 2.2%, respectively; difference, 22.8%; 95% CI, 13.5%-32.2%; P < .001). Whereas articles from nonspecialty journals focused on broad topics like osteoporosis, articles from OBGYN journal focused on topics like preeclampsia and endometriosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study found substantial differences between top-cited OBGYN articles published in nonspecialty vs OBGYN journals. These differences may reflect the different goals of the journals, which work together to ensure optimal dissemination of impactful articles. American Medical Association 2019-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6991228/ /pubmed/31860106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18007 Text en Copyright 2019 Brandt JS et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Brandt, Justin S. Hadaya, Ola Schuster, Meike Rosen, Todd Sauer, Mark V. Ananth, Cande V. A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology |
title | A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology |
title_full | A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology |
title_fullStr | A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology |
title_full_unstemmed | A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology |
title_short | A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology |
title_sort | bibliometric analysis of top-cited journal articles in obstetrics and gynecology |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6991228/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31860106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brandtjustins abibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology AT hadayaola abibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology AT schustermeike abibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology AT rosentodd abibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology AT sauermarkv abibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology AT ananthcandev abibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology AT brandtjustins bibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology AT hadayaola bibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology AT schustermeike bibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology AT rosentodd bibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology AT sauermarkv bibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology AT ananthcandev bibliometricanalysisoftopcitedjournalarticlesinobstetricsandgynecology |