Cargando…
Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors
OBJECTIVE: One of the common complications occurring after cranioplasty (CP) is aseptic bone-flap resorption (ABFR). Reoperation necessary because of the development of ABFR can lead to unfavorable complications during subsequent surgery using a synthetic skull implant, and also necessarily leads to...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6992164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31999739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228009 |
_version_ | 1783492787800375296 |
---|---|
author | Rashidi, Ali Sandalcioglu, I. Erol Luchtmann, Michael |
author_facet | Rashidi, Ali Sandalcioglu, I. Erol Luchtmann, Michael |
author_sort | Rashidi, Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: One of the common complications occurring after cranioplasty (CP) is aseptic bone-flap resorption (ABFR). Reoperation necessary because of the development of ABFR can lead to unfavorable complications during subsequent surgery using a synthetic skull implant, and also necessarily leads to higher costs. The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors that may help to predict the development of ABFR. METHODS: In this study, 303 CP surgeries performed between 2002 and 2017 were examined retrospectively to identify factors predicting the occurrence of ABFR. A number of these factors (e.g., time lapse between decompressive craniectomy (DC) and CP, bone-flap size, specific laboratory signs, and the reason for the original DC) were analyzed as possibly influencing the risk of developing ABFR. RESULTS: ABFR of an autologous bone flap that subsequently required a CP with synthetic skull implants occurred in 10 of 303 patients (3.0%). CP timing and patients' Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) (p = 0.008; p = 0.012) were identified as significant factors with an impact on the development of ABRF. Age did not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows a clear trend. The younger the age, the more likely it was that an ABFR would develop. CONCLUSION: The risk of ABFR lessens the longer the period of time elapsed between DC and CP. Age does not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows that there is a clear trend. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6992164 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69921642020-02-20 Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors Rashidi, Ali Sandalcioglu, I. Erol Luchtmann, Michael PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: One of the common complications occurring after cranioplasty (CP) is aseptic bone-flap resorption (ABFR). Reoperation necessary because of the development of ABFR can lead to unfavorable complications during subsequent surgery using a synthetic skull implant, and also necessarily leads to higher costs. The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors that may help to predict the development of ABFR. METHODS: In this study, 303 CP surgeries performed between 2002 and 2017 were examined retrospectively to identify factors predicting the occurrence of ABFR. A number of these factors (e.g., time lapse between decompressive craniectomy (DC) and CP, bone-flap size, specific laboratory signs, and the reason for the original DC) were analyzed as possibly influencing the risk of developing ABFR. RESULTS: ABFR of an autologous bone flap that subsequently required a CP with synthetic skull implants occurred in 10 of 303 patients (3.0%). CP timing and patients' Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) (p = 0.008; p = 0.012) were identified as significant factors with an impact on the development of ABRF. Age did not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows a clear trend. The younger the age, the more likely it was that an ABFR would develop. CONCLUSION: The risk of ABFR lessens the longer the period of time elapsed between DC and CP. Age does not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows that there is a clear trend. Public Library of Science 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6992164/ /pubmed/31999739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228009 Text en © 2020 Rashidi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rashidi, Ali Sandalcioglu, I. Erol Luchtmann, Michael Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors |
title | Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors |
title_full | Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors |
title_fullStr | Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors |
title_full_unstemmed | Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors |
title_short | Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors |
title_sort | aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6992164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31999739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rashidiali asepticboneflapresorptionaftercranioplastyincidenceandriskfactors AT sandalciogluierol asepticboneflapresorptionaftercranioplastyincidenceandriskfactors AT luchtmannmichael asepticboneflapresorptionaftercranioplastyincidenceandriskfactors |