Cargando…

Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors

OBJECTIVE: One of the common complications occurring after cranioplasty (CP) is aseptic bone-flap resorption (ABFR). Reoperation necessary because of the development of ABFR can lead to unfavorable complications during subsequent surgery using a synthetic skull implant, and also necessarily leads to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rashidi, Ali, Sandalcioglu, I. Erol, Luchtmann, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6992164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31999739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228009
_version_ 1783492787800375296
author Rashidi, Ali
Sandalcioglu, I. Erol
Luchtmann, Michael
author_facet Rashidi, Ali
Sandalcioglu, I. Erol
Luchtmann, Michael
author_sort Rashidi, Ali
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: One of the common complications occurring after cranioplasty (CP) is aseptic bone-flap resorption (ABFR). Reoperation necessary because of the development of ABFR can lead to unfavorable complications during subsequent surgery using a synthetic skull implant, and also necessarily leads to higher costs. The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors that may help to predict the development of ABFR. METHODS: In this study, 303 CP surgeries performed between 2002 and 2017 were examined retrospectively to identify factors predicting the occurrence of ABFR. A number of these factors (e.g., time lapse between decompressive craniectomy (DC) and CP, bone-flap size, specific laboratory signs, and the reason for the original DC) were analyzed as possibly influencing the risk of developing ABFR. RESULTS: ABFR of an autologous bone flap that subsequently required a CP with synthetic skull implants occurred in 10 of 303 patients (3.0%). CP timing and patients' Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) (p = 0.008; p = 0.012) were identified as significant factors with an impact on the development of ABRF. Age did not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows a clear trend. The younger the age, the more likely it was that an ABFR would develop. CONCLUSION: The risk of ABFR lessens the longer the period of time elapsed between DC and CP. Age does not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows that there is a clear trend.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6992164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69921642020-02-20 Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors Rashidi, Ali Sandalcioglu, I. Erol Luchtmann, Michael PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: One of the common complications occurring after cranioplasty (CP) is aseptic bone-flap resorption (ABFR). Reoperation necessary because of the development of ABFR can lead to unfavorable complications during subsequent surgery using a synthetic skull implant, and also necessarily leads to higher costs. The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors that may help to predict the development of ABFR. METHODS: In this study, 303 CP surgeries performed between 2002 and 2017 were examined retrospectively to identify factors predicting the occurrence of ABFR. A number of these factors (e.g., time lapse between decompressive craniectomy (DC) and CP, bone-flap size, specific laboratory signs, and the reason for the original DC) were analyzed as possibly influencing the risk of developing ABFR. RESULTS: ABFR of an autologous bone flap that subsequently required a CP with synthetic skull implants occurred in 10 of 303 patients (3.0%). CP timing and patients' Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) (p = 0.008; p = 0.012) were identified as significant factors with an impact on the development of ABRF. Age did not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows a clear trend. The younger the age, the more likely it was that an ABFR would develop. CONCLUSION: The risk of ABFR lessens the longer the period of time elapsed between DC and CP. Age does not reveal a significant value, but statistical analysis shows that there is a clear trend. Public Library of Science 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6992164/ /pubmed/31999739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228009 Text en © 2020 Rashidi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rashidi, Ali
Sandalcioglu, I. Erol
Luchtmann, Michael
Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors
title Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors
title_full Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors
title_fullStr Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors
title_full_unstemmed Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors
title_short Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors
title_sort aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6992164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31999739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228009
work_keys_str_mv AT rashidiali asepticboneflapresorptionaftercranioplastyincidenceandriskfactors
AT sandalciogluierol asepticboneflapresorptionaftercranioplastyincidenceandriskfactors
AT luchtmannmichael asepticboneflapresorptionaftercranioplastyincidenceandriskfactors