Cargando…

Whole body MRI in multiple myeloma: Optimising image acquisition and read times

OBJECTIVE: To identify the whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) image type(s) with the highest value for assessment of multiple myeloma, in order to optimise acquisition protocols and read times. METHODS: Thirty patients with clinically-suspected MM underwent WB-MRI at 3 Tesla. Unenhanced Dixon images [fat-only...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Saurabh, Pilavachi, Elly, Dudek, Alexandra, Bray, Timothy J. P., Latifoltojar, Arash, Rajesparan, Kannan, Punwani, Shonit, Hall-Craggs, Margaret A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6992198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31999774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228424
_version_ 1783492795766407168
author Singh, Saurabh
Pilavachi, Elly
Dudek, Alexandra
Bray, Timothy J. P.
Latifoltojar, Arash
Rajesparan, Kannan
Punwani, Shonit
Hall-Craggs, Margaret A.
author_facet Singh, Saurabh
Pilavachi, Elly
Dudek, Alexandra
Bray, Timothy J. P.
Latifoltojar, Arash
Rajesparan, Kannan
Punwani, Shonit
Hall-Craggs, Margaret A.
author_sort Singh, Saurabh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify the whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) image type(s) with the highest value for assessment of multiple myeloma, in order to optimise acquisition protocols and read times. METHODS: Thirty patients with clinically-suspected MM underwent WB-MRI at 3 Tesla. Unenhanced Dixon images [fat-only (FO) and water-only (WO)], post contrast Dixon [fat-only plus contrast (FOC) and water-only plus contrast (WOC)] and diffusion weighted images (DWI) of the pelvis from all 30 patients were randomised and read by three experienced readers. For each image type, each reader identified and labelled all visible myeloma lesions. Each identified lesion was compared with a composite reference standard achieved by review of a complete imaging dataset by a further experienced consultant radiologist to determine truly positive lesions. Lesion count, true positives, sensitivity, and positive predictive value were determined. Time to read each scan set was recorded. Confidence for a diagnosis of myeloma was scored using a Likert scale. Conspicuity of focal lesions was assessed in terms of percent contrast and contrast to noise ratio (CNR). RESULTS: Lesion count, true positives, sensitivity and confidence scores were significantly higher when compared to other image types for DWI (P<0.0001 to 0.003), followed by WOC (significant for sensitivity (P<0.0001 to 0.004), true positives (P = 0.003 to 0.049) and positive predictive value (P< 0.0001 to 0.006)). There was no statistically significant difference in these metrics between FO and FOC. Percent contrast was highest for WOC (P = 0.001 to 0.005) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was highest for DWI (P = 0.03 to 0.05). Reading times were fastest for DWI across all observers (P< 0.0001 to 0.014). DISCUSSION: Observers detected more myeloma lesions on DWI images and WOC images when compared to other image types. We suggest that these image types should be read preferentially by radiologists to improve diagnostic accuracy and reporting efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6992198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69921982020-02-20 Whole body MRI in multiple myeloma: Optimising image acquisition and read times Singh, Saurabh Pilavachi, Elly Dudek, Alexandra Bray, Timothy J. P. Latifoltojar, Arash Rajesparan, Kannan Punwani, Shonit Hall-Craggs, Margaret A. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To identify the whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) image type(s) with the highest value for assessment of multiple myeloma, in order to optimise acquisition protocols and read times. METHODS: Thirty patients with clinically-suspected MM underwent WB-MRI at 3 Tesla. Unenhanced Dixon images [fat-only (FO) and water-only (WO)], post contrast Dixon [fat-only plus contrast (FOC) and water-only plus contrast (WOC)] and diffusion weighted images (DWI) of the pelvis from all 30 patients were randomised and read by three experienced readers. For each image type, each reader identified and labelled all visible myeloma lesions. Each identified lesion was compared with a composite reference standard achieved by review of a complete imaging dataset by a further experienced consultant radiologist to determine truly positive lesions. Lesion count, true positives, sensitivity, and positive predictive value were determined. Time to read each scan set was recorded. Confidence for a diagnosis of myeloma was scored using a Likert scale. Conspicuity of focal lesions was assessed in terms of percent contrast and contrast to noise ratio (CNR). RESULTS: Lesion count, true positives, sensitivity and confidence scores were significantly higher when compared to other image types for DWI (P<0.0001 to 0.003), followed by WOC (significant for sensitivity (P<0.0001 to 0.004), true positives (P = 0.003 to 0.049) and positive predictive value (P< 0.0001 to 0.006)). There was no statistically significant difference in these metrics between FO and FOC. Percent contrast was highest for WOC (P = 0.001 to 0.005) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was highest for DWI (P = 0.03 to 0.05). Reading times were fastest for DWI across all observers (P< 0.0001 to 0.014). DISCUSSION: Observers detected more myeloma lesions on DWI images and WOC images when compared to other image types. We suggest that these image types should be read preferentially by radiologists to improve diagnostic accuracy and reporting efficiency. Public Library of Science 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6992198/ /pubmed/31999774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228424 Text en © 2020 Singh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Singh, Saurabh
Pilavachi, Elly
Dudek, Alexandra
Bray, Timothy J. P.
Latifoltojar, Arash
Rajesparan, Kannan
Punwani, Shonit
Hall-Craggs, Margaret A.
Whole body MRI in multiple myeloma: Optimising image acquisition and read times
title Whole body MRI in multiple myeloma: Optimising image acquisition and read times
title_full Whole body MRI in multiple myeloma: Optimising image acquisition and read times
title_fullStr Whole body MRI in multiple myeloma: Optimising image acquisition and read times
title_full_unstemmed Whole body MRI in multiple myeloma: Optimising image acquisition and read times
title_short Whole body MRI in multiple myeloma: Optimising image acquisition and read times
title_sort whole body mri in multiple myeloma: optimising image acquisition and read times
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6992198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31999774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228424
work_keys_str_mv AT singhsaurabh wholebodymriinmultiplemyelomaoptimisingimageacquisitionandreadtimes
AT pilavachielly wholebodymriinmultiplemyelomaoptimisingimageacquisitionandreadtimes
AT dudekalexandra wholebodymriinmultiplemyelomaoptimisingimageacquisitionandreadtimes
AT braytimothyjp wholebodymriinmultiplemyelomaoptimisingimageacquisitionandreadtimes
AT latifoltojararash wholebodymriinmultiplemyelomaoptimisingimageacquisitionandreadtimes
AT rajesparankannan wholebodymriinmultiplemyelomaoptimisingimageacquisitionandreadtimes
AT punwanishonit wholebodymriinmultiplemyelomaoptimisingimageacquisitionandreadtimes
AT hallcraggsmargareta wholebodymriinmultiplemyelomaoptimisingimageacquisitionandreadtimes