Cargando…
Placement of TOF-Cuff® on the lower leg for neuromuscular and blood pressure monitoring during anesthetic induction for shoulder surgeries
The aim of this study was to compare two devices for neuromuscular monitoring during anesthetic induction. TOF-Cuff(®) was installed on the lower leg stimulating the tibial nerve, while the more conventional TOF-Scan(®) was installed over the ulnar nerve at the wrist. Methods Twenty adult patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6992549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31760477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00540-019-02712-7 |
Sumario: | The aim of this study was to compare two devices for neuromuscular monitoring during anesthetic induction. TOF-Cuff(®) was installed on the lower leg stimulating the tibial nerve, while the more conventional TOF-Scan(®) was installed over the ulnar nerve at the wrist. Methods Twenty adult patients were enrolled in this prospective, controlled study. Train-of-four (TOF) was recorded every 15 s until TOF ratio of 0%. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was assessed with TOF-Cuff® and with standard anesthesia monitoring from the brachial artery. MAP was measured before and after anesthetic induction. Time to TOF ratio = 0% was compared with one-sample t test and Bland–Altman plots. Results Patients received 0.53 ± 0.09 mg atracurium per kg body weight intravenously. Mean time to TOF ratio = 0% was 150.8 s (± 43.7) for TOF-Scan(®), and 174.4 s (± 42.7) for TOF-Cuff(®) (p = 0.1356). Bias was − 15.9 (95% confidence interval − 37.5 to 5.6) with 95% limits of agreement of − 95.2 to 63.3. Twenty-five percent of the patients had a technical issue with a TOF-Cuff(®) measurement. For MAP, mean difference was 1.4 (95% confidence interval − 2.4 to 5.2) with 95% limits of agreement of − 22.7 to 25.5. Conclusion The time from administration of a common dose of atracurium to a TOF ratio of 0% assessed with TOF-Cuff® stimulating the tibial nerve compared to TOF-Scan® stimulating the ulnar nerve showed large limits of agreement in Bland–Altman analysis. There was a high failure rate with TOF-Cuff® measurements on the lower leg. |
---|