Cargando…

ACTION for Men: Study Protocol of a Community Capacity Building Intervention to Develop and Implement Gender-Sensitive Physical Activity Programs for Men 50 Plus

Introduction: Capacity building for health promotion is a relevant precondition for sustainable, health-related changes in community settings. So far, there are few evidence-based recommendations about how to implement and evaluate community capacity building approaches. ACTION for men (A4M) is a pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strobl, Helmut, Brew-Sam, Nicola, Curbach, Janina, Metz, Boris, Tittlbach, Susanne, Loss, Julika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6992606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00004
_version_ 1783492864293994496
author Strobl, Helmut
Brew-Sam, Nicola
Curbach, Janina
Metz, Boris
Tittlbach, Susanne
Loss, Julika
author_facet Strobl, Helmut
Brew-Sam, Nicola
Curbach, Janina
Metz, Boris
Tittlbach, Susanne
Loss, Julika
author_sort Strobl, Helmut
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Capacity building for health promotion is a relevant precondition for sustainable, health-related changes in community settings. So far, there are few evidence-based recommendations about how to implement and evaluate community capacity building approaches. ACTION for men (A4M) is a project designed to build and evaluate capacities for health promotion in three rural communities in Bavaria, Germany, via a participatory approach including multiple community stakeholders. The project specifically aims at improving physical activity (PA) in men over 50 years of age (50 plus). Methods and Analysis: As a strategy to build the communities' capacities, we set up stakeholder groups in so far two communities. Those stakeholder groups will be facilitated over a period of 1–3 years. In regular meetings, the group members will be motivated to actively participate in planning and implementing PA programs for men 50 plus. The facilitation will systematically address key domains of community capacity (e.g., critical awareness, problem assessment, resource mobilization). The evaluation of the capacity building processes will be carried out using a mixed-methods design. Evaluation instruments consist of structured documentations and face-to-face interviews with stakeholder group participants (and drop-outs) as well as a pre-post-test using a standardized questionnaire in order to detect activity-related changes in men 50 plus from the involved communities. In community three, we will conduct the same procedure with a delay of 6 months. Discussion: Building community capacity for health promotion programs is the primary aim in A4M, and thus differs from previous research in which capacity is mostly a means to an end or an “incidental” result of a health promotion program. Therefore, A4M is expected to deliver important findings about how to implement and evaluate capacity building processes for health promotion, as well as how to address physical activity in community settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6992606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69926062020-02-07 ACTION for Men: Study Protocol of a Community Capacity Building Intervention to Develop and Implement Gender-Sensitive Physical Activity Programs for Men 50 Plus Strobl, Helmut Brew-Sam, Nicola Curbach, Janina Metz, Boris Tittlbach, Susanne Loss, Julika Front Public Health Public Health Introduction: Capacity building for health promotion is a relevant precondition for sustainable, health-related changes in community settings. So far, there are few evidence-based recommendations about how to implement and evaluate community capacity building approaches. ACTION for men (A4M) is a project designed to build and evaluate capacities for health promotion in three rural communities in Bavaria, Germany, via a participatory approach including multiple community stakeholders. The project specifically aims at improving physical activity (PA) in men over 50 years of age (50 plus). Methods and Analysis: As a strategy to build the communities' capacities, we set up stakeholder groups in so far two communities. Those stakeholder groups will be facilitated over a period of 1–3 years. In regular meetings, the group members will be motivated to actively participate in planning and implementing PA programs for men 50 plus. The facilitation will systematically address key domains of community capacity (e.g., critical awareness, problem assessment, resource mobilization). The evaluation of the capacity building processes will be carried out using a mixed-methods design. Evaluation instruments consist of structured documentations and face-to-face interviews with stakeholder group participants (and drop-outs) as well as a pre-post-test using a standardized questionnaire in order to detect activity-related changes in men 50 plus from the involved communities. In community three, we will conduct the same procedure with a delay of 6 months. Discussion: Building community capacity for health promotion programs is the primary aim in A4M, and thus differs from previous research in which capacity is mostly a means to an end or an “incidental” result of a health promotion program. Therefore, A4M is expected to deliver important findings about how to implement and evaluate capacity building processes for health promotion, as well as how to address physical activity in community settings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6992606/ /pubmed/32039133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00004 Text en Copyright © 2020 Strobl, Brew-Sam, Curbach, Metz, Tittlbach and Loss. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Strobl, Helmut
Brew-Sam, Nicola
Curbach, Janina
Metz, Boris
Tittlbach, Susanne
Loss, Julika
ACTION for Men: Study Protocol of a Community Capacity Building Intervention to Develop and Implement Gender-Sensitive Physical Activity Programs for Men 50 Plus
title ACTION for Men: Study Protocol of a Community Capacity Building Intervention to Develop and Implement Gender-Sensitive Physical Activity Programs for Men 50 Plus
title_full ACTION for Men: Study Protocol of a Community Capacity Building Intervention to Develop and Implement Gender-Sensitive Physical Activity Programs for Men 50 Plus
title_fullStr ACTION for Men: Study Protocol of a Community Capacity Building Intervention to Develop and Implement Gender-Sensitive Physical Activity Programs for Men 50 Plus
title_full_unstemmed ACTION for Men: Study Protocol of a Community Capacity Building Intervention to Develop and Implement Gender-Sensitive Physical Activity Programs for Men 50 Plus
title_short ACTION for Men: Study Protocol of a Community Capacity Building Intervention to Develop and Implement Gender-Sensitive Physical Activity Programs for Men 50 Plus
title_sort action for men: study protocol of a community capacity building intervention to develop and implement gender-sensitive physical activity programs for men 50 plus
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6992606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00004
work_keys_str_mv AT stroblhelmut actionformenstudyprotocolofacommunitycapacitybuildinginterventiontodevelopandimplementgendersensitivephysicalactivityprogramsformen50plus
AT brewsamnicola actionformenstudyprotocolofacommunitycapacitybuildinginterventiontodevelopandimplementgendersensitivephysicalactivityprogramsformen50plus
AT curbachjanina actionformenstudyprotocolofacommunitycapacitybuildinginterventiontodevelopandimplementgendersensitivephysicalactivityprogramsformen50plus
AT metzboris actionformenstudyprotocolofacommunitycapacitybuildinginterventiontodevelopandimplementgendersensitivephysicalactivityprogramsformen50plus
AT tittlbachsusanne actionformenstudyprotocolofacommunitycapacitybuildinginterventiontodevelopandimplementgendersensitivephysicalactivityprogramsformen50plus
AT lossjulika actionformenstudyprotocolofacommunitycapacitybuildinginterventiontodevelopandimplementgendersensitivephysicalactivityprogramsformen50plus